(08-29-2012 11:47 PM)mbelcher987 Wrote: (08-29-2012 11:24 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote: I'll say this for the UAB fans who keep telling us how our program is below their. It's 2012 now and UAB is sitting at two winning seasons since the 90's. Troy is sitting at 5 straight titles and only two times since 2004 has Troy had less than 8 wins. We have 13 players in the NFL, UAB has 4. UAB has been to 1 bowl, Troy has been to 5, some of which came when there was only one bowl tie in. UAB has had upwards of five chances to make a bowl since 2005, they did not.
Troy/UAB is a rivalry game. Talent and coaching quality don't have as much impact as they normally would. Which is why its been close and UAB has won some. So the little factoid, (cherry picked because Troy leads 5-4 overall, and tied 3-3 since 2002), that UAB leads the series since FBS play means little.
For the long term success for Trojan football is the SBC the conference to be in? Would you rather be in a conference with 6 bowl tie ins or 1? Would you rather play ECU USM & TULSA or would you rather play WKU FAU and MTSU? UNT and FIU sure chose the first group. Now that we have a real football coach do you really think any of these last 6 years are relevant? 1 winning seasons and all of the Neil Callaway stink is washed away. A couple losing seasons for Troy and all of your past "success" is gone too. Your coach will retire soon. Most of your success in the past comes from his long tenure there. Be afraid for we are entering the year of the dragon. This saturday we will see how our programs match against each other.
You apparently can't count UAB is up 4-3 since 2002. In 93 and 95 we were barely starting out in FCS. Long term they will count in the series but to say Troy is up 5-4 on UAB is really just misleading because we had been playing football for a very short time at that point.
That "misleading" overall figure came from
uabsports.com. Go yell at them for misleading you. You were right, 4-3 since 2002. Overlooking a single score while checking ESPN and not being able to count are not related. I don't take offense to "you can't count" or "you can't spell" jabs. Any run of the mill forum poster can pull a quick jab off the shelf that everyone else tosses around thinking they're being witty or clever.
The series might be close, but we have the better program, hands down, and it shows. And you can't really say you have a better program because you lead the series since 2002. You've beaten USM three years in a row and are no where near the caliber program they are. You have certain teams that you play beyond your normal abilities. Those are called anomalies. Once Blakeney leaves, Troy will probably slide for a while and hire some revolving door coaches, and if CGM is as good as you say he is, you might have the better program for a while. Can't argue that that's a possible outcome.
I will say one more thing. Guys like you are cookie cutter. You fit the mold exactly of the typical fan that gets excited over a new coach. Every coach comes in saying "we're gonna be more aggressive, we're gonna attack the ball more on defense." They all claim they're "changing the culture." Entire fanbases go nuts and make all these claims about how they're going to be a dominate force and
we all better watch out. Here's an example of a good one: Mark Hudspeth, Hugh Freeze. Here's an example of a bad one: Todd Dodge. I'm sure you can think of multiple guys on a national level with big claims and energized spring and fall practices only to come out with football teams that failed to live up to expectations.
Go on, tell me how yours is different. It's like ground hogs day, the movie. It's all the same to me, I've heard it a million times.