lol The Associated Press. Weren't they the same guys who were called out for writing a misleading headline about Vance's comments shortly after a school shooting? Why, yes. Yes, they were.

lulz

(09-11-2024 07:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Blah blah blah...nice try, Clarence...fail.

I see “blah blah blah” is LITERALLY your substantive comment / reply. Rich.

Maybe next time take your knuckles out of your mouth and try a substantive response.

Lolz.

(09-11-2024 07:18 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:13 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  He's going to gaslight you and use pretzel logic to say you didn't really read or hear what you actually read or heard. He does it all the time.

Don't give him a chance to go off on a tangent and obfuscate, as he normally does.

Too late. lol

(09-11-2024 07:26 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  lol The Associated Press. Weren't they the same guys who were called out for writing a misleading headline about Vance's comments shortly after a school shooting? Why, yes. Yes, they were.

lulz

Too stupid to address the items in the link, I see.

Just whine and screech on the source.

Are you sure you have a college degree?

Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

Trump knew that.

(09-11-2024 07:26 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  lol The Associated Press. Weren't they the same guys who were called out for writing a misleading headline about Vance's comments shortly after a school shooting? Why, yes. Yes, they were.

lulz

This is what I was referring to. It's a thread that CrimsonPhantom made, but it has tweets and screenshots that prove how dubious of a source the AP is. Therefore, I treat anything from them, like anything from NPR, ABC News, etc., as left-wing propaganda and not actual news.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-996435.html

You're welcome.

(09-11-2024 07:37 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

Trump knew that.

Lots of honest people know that. But apparently not Clarence.

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

They don't care though, 3A. Not one bit.

(09-11-2024 07:39 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:26 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  lol The Associated Press. Weren't they the same guys who were called out for writing a misleading headline about Vance's comments shortly after a school shooting? Why, yes. Yes, they were.

lulz

This is what I was referring to. It's a thread that CrimsonPhantom made, but it has tweets and screenshots that prove how dubious of a source the AP is. Therefore, I treat anything from them, like anything from NPR, ABC News, etc., as left-wing propaganda and not actual news.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-996435.html

You're welcome.

Like a true ignorant fk Trumpie.

Simply stick your fingers in your ear.

Good job chuckles.

(09-11-2024 07:13 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  He's going to gaslight you and use pretzel logic to say you didn't really read or hear what you actually read or heard. He does it all the time.

this ditty came to mind ...

(09-11-2024 07:42 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

They don't care though, 3A. Not one bit.

And I don't care what they think. But when somebody calls somebody a liar, they ought to be corrected if they are wrong.

(09-11-2024 07:47 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:42 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

They don't care though, 3A. Not one bit.

And I don't care what they think. But when somebody calls somebody a liar, they ought to be corrected if they are wrong.

absolutely. They should taken to task for spreading false information.

(09-11-2024 07:47 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

how many f-bombs do you think he had to strike-thru before going on air ....

@wannaBeJewTrappedInThe'sipByChoice

Gutfeld is one of the last few standing with a clue ... Watters is close...

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

But had you tried to simply use a single iota of effort, as opposed to straight injecting Charlie Kirk via Fox, you might be surprised that the State of Minnesota is required to publish the status.

3 pre viable.
3 given comfort care. (By definition “reasonable measures …. to support the life and health of the infant”)
2 severe and fatal fetal anomalies.

https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/mchs...6abrpt.pdf

Quote:And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

The simple fact is that late term abortions are *xceedingly* rare. And that nearly every single late term abortion involves severe and fatal fetus deformities or non-viability.

No matter *if* the statute doesn’t say it has to be. No matter how much you scream and clamor above.

Good grief.

That is the danger of mainlining Fox without having t fing energy or grey matter to poke around a bit.

Double good grief.

(09-11-2024 08:06 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-11-2024 07:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Fox just reported on air that:

Per ABC News, at least 9 states have no restrictions based on how far along a woman is in her pregnancy and many have recently added amendments enshrining the right to abortion in their state constitutions. No mention of non-viable fetuses.

AND, Fox added, in the state of Minnesota, over the past few years, 8 babies were born alive and then terminated. And again, nowhere does it mention these are non-viable fetuses.

But had you tried to simply use a single iota of effort, as opposed to straight injecting Charlie Kirk via Fox, you might be surprised that the State of Minnesota is required to publish the status.

3 pre viable.
3 given comfort care. (By definition “reasonable measures …. to support the life and health of the infant”)
2 severe and fatal fetal anomalies.

https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/mchs...6abrpt.pdf

Quote:And if they were non-viable, that can usually be determined BEFORE birth. But the crux of the issue is, nowhere does it say the baby HAS to be NON-VIABLE.

The simple fact is that late term abortions are *xceedingly* rare. And that nearly every single late term abortion involves severe and fatal fetus deformities or non-viability.

No matter *if* the statute doesn’t say it has to be. No matter how much you scream and clamor above.

Good grief.

That is the danger of mainlining Fox without having t fing energy or grey matter to poke around a bit.

Double good grief.

No more rare than having an abortion to save the mother's life or due to incest or rape. They abort Down Syndrome babies in the Nordic Socialist Utopuas the Left idolize all of the time.

"...pretty excessive and bald falsehoods as...Dems support executing babies”

^^ Your words.

But now you have qualified it...

"Exceediingly rare." "...nearly every single late term abortion."

And those are simply your words. Vs. a news anchor on Fox. But you want to shoot the messenger, too.

(09-11-2024 08:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  "...pretty excessive and bald falsehoods as...Dems support executing babies”

^^ Your words.

But now you have qualified it...

"Exceediingly rare." "...nearly every single late term abortion."

And those are simply your words. Vs. a news anchor on Fox. But you want to shoot the messenger, too.

And you studiously omit the second leg. That is late term abortions, when excluding non-viable and severe fetal defects simply don’t happen.

One offs like Gosnell do occur. And Gosnell was prosecuted mind you.

I fundamentally challenge you to show anything to this wave of baby executions based on your jumping up and down and flapping your arms on the presence of laws in 9 states.

You might also note that Fox reported on ‘live abortions’. Not late term per se. You might also note that Fox entirely omitted the status of those.

I found them easily. You could have if you had made a fing iota of effort. Fox chose not to include them.

I linked to the required report. Again…. Non viable, severe abnormalities, and the remainder afforded the care to try and save them.

Northam noted these events. Yes, I have zero problem with late term abortions with non-viability. I have zero problem with late term abortion with fatal fetal defects.

Yep, real set of “execution”. Maybe look at the video you provided first. Or maybe not conflate late term abortion with aborted fetuses coming in live, which you do. And maybe try to look up some facts that seem to be missing from the Fox report.

Or just regurgitate crap and throw it on the wall to see what sticks.

Good grief. Again.