(09-07-2024 08:23 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:11 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 07:38 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 07:32 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.

he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?

I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!

He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.

Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.

I tried to tell y'all moons ago how he 'hated DJT with a passion' ... there was never a doubt...

he's muh Felix ... y'all ain' figgled that out that part(y), (n)yet?~! ... yeah...

he knows I can take a punch .... I'm just waiting for him to toss 'one' ...

Nobody liked Felix, he was a grumpy old man.

I'm pretty sure that if you remove Trump from the equation Bourbon Bob is a great guy. But that TDS, man, it overshadows every single redeeming quality he may have, at least out here in cyberville.

Pretty much my take, too. Except for one thing. Underlying the witty repartee is an obvious lack of respect for opinions that differ from his own. On any subject.

(09-07-2024 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:01 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support

Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:

Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.

"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.

"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”

This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.

The answer to the question was in the first 5 words, “Well, I would do that,..." and while it may not translate well on paper, in context, as he is speaking the words, they make a whole lot more sense. You just have a problem with his speaking style which is admittedly different.

Correct. I dont speak gobbledygook very well. Let alone trying to blunder *some* answer and word salad repeating garbage -- with really no 'verb-noun' structure. Or just relying on broad crap platitudes to "numbers we are talking about".

You, like all narcissists, are just jealous. Here is someone who is obviously far Inferior to you that has accomplished more than you and 5 generations of you offspring ever will. That infuriates you. Add on top that you can convince no one here but the intellectually lacking and we get just what you display.

Don’t bother replying. Everyone here could write the response you will have.

I'd put all those women who are getting freebies to work at day care center to pay off what they get from the guvmint. Of course with supervision as I assume many don't have a good work ethic.

(09-07-2024 10:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:23 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:11 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 07:38 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?

I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!

He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.

Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.

I tried to tell y'all moons ago how he 'hated DJT with a passion' ... there was never a doubt...

he's muh Felix ... y'all ain' figgled that out that part(y), (n)yet?~! ... yeah...

he knows I can take a punch .... I'm just waiting for him to toss 'one' ...

Nobody liked Felix, he was a grumpy old man.

I'm pretty sure that if you remove Trump from the equation Bourbon Bob is a great guy. But that TDS, man, it overshadows every single redeeming quality he may have, at least out here in cyberville.

Pretty much my take, too. Except for one thing. Underlying the witty repartee is an obvious lack of respect for opinions that differ from his own. On any subject.

As opposed to the enormous amount of pure respect that the majority of this board shows for opinions that differ from theirs. Got it. Sounds on point.

Lolz.

(09-07-2024 10:54 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:01 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support

Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:

Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.

"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.

"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”

This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.

The answer to the question was in the first 5 words, “Well, I would do that,..." and while it may not translate well on paper, in context, as he is speaking the words, they make a whole lot more sense. You just have a problem with his speaking style which is admittedly different.

Correct. I dont speak gobbledygook very well. Let alone trying to blunder *some* answer and word salad repeating garbage -- with really no 'verb-noun' structure. Or just relying on broad crap platitudes to "numbers we are talking about".

You, like all narcissists, are just jealous. Here is someone who is obviously far Inferior to you that has accomplished more than you and 5 generations of you offspring ever will. That infuriates you. Add on top that you can convince no one here but the intellectually lacking and we get just what you display.

Don’t bother replying. Everyone here could write the response you will have.

Lolz. Spoken like a pure defensive reflexive idiot. Bravo.

Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

(09-07-2024 02:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

Glad you feel the need to underscore directly above that respect you whine and swivel about so much previously. Good job there, capn.

Maybe get back to your typical posting combo of ****** ass tweeters and plaintive yelling at the clouds, with a good side helping of bitching about the "uniparty" conspiracy garbage.

(09-07-2024 03:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 02:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

Glad you feel the need to underscore directly above that respect you whine and swivel about so much previously. Good job there, capn.

Maybe get back to your typical posting combo of ****** ass tweeters and plaintive yelling at the clouds, with a good side helping of bitching about the "uniparty" conspiracy garbage.

Careful. You're gonna make me cry.

I'm sure you're a barrel of laughs in a courtroom. If you're ever in one.

P.S. I didn't know "whine and swivel" was a thing.

(09-07-2024 08:51 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 08:01 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support

Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:

Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.

"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.

"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”

This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.

The answer to the question was in the first 5 words, “Well, I would do that,..." and while it may not translate well on paper, in context, as he is speaking the words, they make a whole lot more sense. You just have a problem with his speaking style which is admittedly different.

Correct. I dont speak gobbledygook very well. Let alone trying to blunder *some* answer and word salad repeating garbage -- with really no 'verb-noun' structure. Or just relying on broad crap platitudes to "numbers we are talking about".

Wait, are we talking about Trump or Harris here??

(09-07-2024 04:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 03:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 02:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

Glad you feel the need to underscore directly above that respect you whine and swivel about so much previously. Good job there, capn.

Maybe get back to your typical posting combo of ****** ass tweeters and plaintive yelling at the clouds, with a good side helping of bitching about the "uniparty" conspiracy garbage.

Careful. You're gonna make me cry.

I'm sure you're a barrel of laughs in a courtroom. If you're ever in one.

P.S. I didn't know "whine and swivel" was a thing.

Should have been 'snivel', big boy. Might have been somewhat obvious. Perhaps not to some.

Wow, when one has to reach for autospell changes and spelling errors, pretty pathetic. Good for you 3A. About on par with the majority of your posts lately.

Nothing but a good round of 'yelling at clouds' to get 3A happy as a clam I surmise.

(09-07-2024 05:39 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 04:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 03:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 02:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

Glad you feel the need to underscore directly above that respect you whine and swivel about so much previously. Good job there, capn.

Maybe get back to your typical posting combo of ****** ass tweeters and plaintive yelling at the clouds, with a good side helping of bitching about the "uniparty" conspiracy garbage.

Careful. You're gonna make me cry.

I'm sure you're a barrel of laughs in a courtroom. If you're ever in one.

P.S. I didn't know "whine and swivel" was a thing.

Should have been 'snivel', big boy. Might have been somewhat obvious. Perhaps not to some.

Wow, when one has to reach for autospell changes and spelling errors, pretty pathetic. Good for you 3A. About on par with the majority of your posts lately.

Nothing but a good round of 'yelling at clouds' to get 3A happy as a clam I surmise.

If I didn't get it, I wouldn't have known to make fun of you, Einstein.

For a long time, I was my normal polite, lighthearted self to you, but you are so dang arrogant, and try to denigrate anyone who disagrees with you b/c you think you're never wrong, that I just decided to get down in the gutter and play your stupid game, and see how you like it.

Glad to see it irritates you.

What's even funnier is, you obviously have no clue that NONE of the dumb*** things you say to me or anybody else here who disagrees with you has any effect on any of us, except to laugh at you.

So carry on, Clarence. We are all so in awe of your presence.

(09-07-2024 05:47 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 05:39 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 04:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 03:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-07-2024 02:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey T, you're in a special category by yourself, lol.

Glad you feel the need to underscore directly above that respect you whine and swivel about so much previously. Good job there, capn.

Maybe get back to your typical posting combo of ****** ass tweeters and plaintive yelling at the clouds, with a good side helping of bitching about the "uniparty" conspiracy garbage.

Careful. You're gonna make me cry.

I'm sure you're a barrel of laughs in a courtroom. If you're ever in one.

P.S. I didn't know "whine and swivel" was a thing.

Should have been 'snivel', big boy. Might have been somewhat obvious. Perhaps not to some.

Wow, when one has to reach for autospell changes and spelling errors, pretty pathetic. Good for you 3A. About on par with the majority of your posts lately.

Nothing but a good round of 'yelling at clouds' to get 3A happy as a clam I surmise.

If I didn't get it, I wouldn't have known to make fun of you, Einstein.

Maybe try something aside from your cheesy ass 'snarling at the clouds.' Might be better in the long run.

Quote:For a long time, I was my normal polite, lighthearted self to you, but you are so dang arrogant, and try to denigrate anyone who disagrees with you b/c you think you're never wrong, that I just decided to get down in the gutter and play your stupid game, and see how you like it.

I denigrate those who denigrate. If you want to play that game, that’s on you, buckaroo.

And to be honest — you are *far* from being normally polite and lighthearted to those who disagree with you. I was happy at your earlier acting that way, but from this perspective that veneer rubbed off as the difference of opinion continued. It seemed to happen when you got pressed on your assertions that didn’t stand in light of the facts, and still didn’t stand after various random links from you that really weren’t pertinent. After which you devolved into the usual stance you seem to take with anything that disagrees with your worldview.

And I am wrong plenty of times. Just check my sig. And at least said it once or twice in the last few weeks on a subject or two. Maybe you need to stop acting like a toddler about that for a tad. I’m sorry you have entered your snit fit stage—- that’s on you.

Quote:Glad to see it irritates you.

What's even funnier is, you obviously have no clue that NONE of the dumb*** things you say to me or anybody else here who disagrees with you has any effect on any of us, except to laugh at you.

So carry on, Clarence. We are all so in awe of your presence.

Considering your multi-paragraph nothing *but* rant, whine, and snivel above (good enough spelling for you, champ?), there is seemingly proof counter to your 'no effect on [3A]'.

Again, keep the whines up. They do you so good. And keep up that 'tweet meme' stuff you excel at as well. Oh, and the 'yelling at the clouds' that you could perhaps win Olympic gold at.

Later, champ.