Trump has to tie Harris to the current state of the union; he needs to hang all the failed policies of the Biden administration around her neck.
He should draw attention to her missteps on issues such as fracking, referencing her own statements from her initial presidential campaign.
He should call attention to the electric vehicle mandates that she has consistently backed but is now reluctant to implement.
Immigration is another significant issue that is waiting to bite her in the ass. In 2016, she ran on a platform of open borders, and now she wants to construct a wall.
The economy is a significant issue, and it should be Trump's primary focus.
He needs to hold her accountable for her involvement in the Afghanistan debacle, the lives lost there, the significant number of women left to deal with the Taliban, the 13 Americans who lost their lives in what should have been their final days there, and the billions of dollars worth of perfectly fine equipment we left for an insane terrorist group. After all, she was, by her own admission, "the last person in the room." He must expose her for the radical she is and make her take ownership of all the lies she tells.
However, when she begins to answer or respond, don't react at all; she will naturally stumble over her own words. If asked, he should respond by reiterating his response to one of Biden's remarks from their debate; he should say, "I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of that, and frankly, I don't think she did either," followed by, "But let me tell you about such and such." He should steer every response back to a policy failure or a reversal of positions from her first race.
I truly hope he can limit the use of sarcasm and avoid the silly name-calling. I have seen him conduct himself exactly as you would expect a sober and successful businessman to do, and I hope he does during the debate.
(09-06-2024 12:10 AM)tanqtonic Wrote: I was impressed by "childcare is childcare". Quite the insight.
Along with the 'with the kind of numbers Im talking about', and that zinger line 4 times in that answer alone -- all without noting any numbers at all. Let alone a magnitude. Multiple more times across other answers.
The entire program televised was a little harder to endure than getting a root canal with a really low level of numb juice. But hey, this guy is BRILLIANT!!!!
Remind me again how many billions you're worth and then lets compare intelligence levels between you and the object of your irrational, borderline insane, hatred.
I guess that he has 'billions and billions' of dollars transforms that crap pie of word into legibility to you.
I do like the fact you *dont* even try and defend his crap salad of verbiage, and instead launch into a mention of it as "irrational, borderline insane, hatred."
The true mark of reflexive crutch. Good job there, chuckles. Well done.
Now, maybe try focusing on the **** salad that Trump rolled out in his answers at the event, instead of your toddler like whining about someone merely mentioning that issue. Lolz.
You know who says words like Lolz? Putzes like you. STFU and sit down little man, you have become beyond boring.
(09-06-2024 12:10 AM)tanqtonic Wrote: I was impressed by "childcare is childcare". Quite the insight.
Along with the 'with the kind of numbers Im talking about', and that zinger line 4 times in that answer alone -- all without noting any numbers at all. Let alone a magnitude. Multiple more times across other answers.
The entire program televised was a little harder to endure than getting a root canal with a really low level of numb juice. But hey, this guy is BRILLIANT!!!!
Remind me again how many billions you're worth and then lets compare intelligence levels between you and the object of your irrational, borderline insane, hatred.
I guess that he has 'billions and billions' of dollars transforms that crap pie of word into legibility to you.
I do like the fact you *dont* even try and defend his crap salad of verbiage, and instead launch into a mention of it as "irrational, borderline insane, hatred."
The true mark of reflexive crutch. Good job there, chuckles. Well done.
Now, maybe try focusing on the **** salad that Trump rolled out in his answers at the event, instead of your toddler like whining about someone merely mentioning that issue. Lolz.
You know who says words like Lolz? Putzes like you. STFU and sit down little man, you have become beyond boring.
I use it frequently with retard level jackasses who cant respond to criticism of their demigod with anything more than shittard comments consisting nothing more than slobber level attempts at putdowns.
Bummer for you, big boy. Lolz.
(This post was last modified: 09-06-2024 07:56 PM by tanqtonic.)
(09-05-2024 08:21 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote: Hannity asked Trump about the debate & that was his answer. Said many say she isn’t as smart as Biden
It’s gonna be so enjoyable watching him just humiliate the stupid drunk whore. He’s also ready for ABC’s one sided crap during the debate too
A more understated assessment:
WSJ commentator Peggy Noonan (who I realize has a spotty prognostication record of late) points out that Donald Trump does not need to make Kamala Kameleon implode on stage, like he did to Joe Biden. Trump merely …
Quote:has to demonstrate he’s sane enough, stable enough and knowledgeable enough to make wavering, centrist and independent voters grow more comfortable with the idea of “The Trump Presidency, Act II.”
Can he do so?
Quote:Probably not! He has trouble corralling himself and doing the sensible thing. His supporters all know this. It is a constant frustration to them.
Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
imagine nuts zongo responding to dipshite-ism that isn't anywhere on the 'table of fk'n MATTTER!'
JUST G'DAMMED, #FK! AT STUPID SHITE from folk that aren't stupid!
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
The answer to the question was in the first 5 words, “Well, I would do that,..." and while it may not translate well on paper, in context, as he is speaking the words, they make a whole lot more sense. You just have a problem with his speaking style which is admittedly different.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great (not in proportion to ones income, we all know prices are never coming back down) when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.
Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.
That said, Trump could benefit from refraining from stream of consciousness speech patterns which is all it is.
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2024 08:13 AM by TigerBlue4Ever.)
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.
Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.
I tried to tell y'all moons ago how he 'hated DJT with a passion' ... there was never a doubt...
he's muh Felix ... y'all ain' figgled that out that part(y), (n)yet?~! ... yeah...
he knows I can take a punch .... I'm just waiting for him to toss 'one' ...
Stream of consciousness, that term got me thinking. Trump does it all the time and it does make his speech come off as a bit disjointed and seemingly random while Kamala's speech is calculated and formulaic, filled with platitudes usually. She has likely rehearsed her responses to any given question or statement so much that they are second nature to her, the inanity of most of her statements isn't questioned because she is consistent with her speech patterns, accents aside. Meanwhile, Trump, using stream of consciousness, requires no script from which to read, he doesn't require days and days of rehearsing to sit down for a 20 minute interview nor are his responses in need of editing before being presented for public consumption. One of his better qualities is the ability to respond on the fly, one of his worst qualities is his propensity to respond on the fly.
(09-06-2024 11:51 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.
Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.
I tried to tell y'all moons ago how he 'hated DJT with a passion' ... there was never a doubt...
he's muh Felix ... y'all ain' figgled that out that part(y), (n)yet?~! ... yeah...
he knows I can take a punch .... I'm just waiting for him to toss 'one' ...
Nobody liked Felix, he was a grumpy old man.
I'm pretty sure that if you remove Trump from the equation Bourbon Bob is a great guy. But that TDS, man, it overshadows every single redeeming quality he may have, at least out here in cyberville.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
The answer to the question was in the first 5 words, “Well, I would do that,..." and while it may not translate well on paper, in context, as he is speaking the words, they make a whole lot more sense. You just have a problem with his speaking style which is admittedly different.
Correct. I dont speak gobbledygook very well. Let alone trying to blunder *some* answer and word salad repeating garbage -- with really no 'verb-noun' structure. Or just relying on broad crap platitudes to "numbers we are talking about".
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2024 08:56 AM by tanqtonic.)
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great (not in proportion to ones income, we all know prices are never coming back down) when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.
Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.
That said, Trump could benefit from refraining from stream of consciousness speech patterns which is all it is.
Huge tariffs == decreased inflation? Give me some of that crack you are smoking. Lolz.
Pawning off stuff in the stupid broad ass "numbers we are talking about"? Double lolz.
(09-06-2024 11:37 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Question: “Would you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable” and “what specific piece of legislation” he would support
Twenty bucks to *anyone* that can provide a translation to the answer provided...
Answer:
Quote:“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn’t — you know, there’s something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to. But they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.”
This, at best, is gobbledygook. Lol.
Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
I did. Sorry you don’t understand.
If you did, I am truly sorry for you and your relatives.
(09-06-2024 11:51 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Well maybe he won’t be burdened by the past since time is so important to get to where we need to go and get back.
I’ll take that choice over Kumswallow. Sorry, that convinced no one. Find some medication other than bourbon.
You could have just said -- 'no, I cannot translate that'. Lol.
he's basically saying 'child care you stupid fks??? ... wtf are youse talkin' 'bout, ya fk'n dipshites!?
I can easily translate the shite out of DJT ... wanna hear more ... it's gang bang time!
He's saying that the cost of childcare in his economy won't be as great (not in proportion to ones income, we all know prices are never coming back down) when considering the influx of revenue his policies will generate and how that will trickle down in the form of higher wages coupled with decreased inflation. You know, like it was back in his first term when damn near everyone in the building was significantly better off.
Once again tanq is engaging in ad hominem by attacking the messenger and not the content of his speech, content that was clear enough if one is able to set aside ones hatred for the author and view his statements objectively.
That said, Trump could benefit from refraining from stream of consciousness speech patterns which is all it is.
Huge tariffs == decreased inflation? Give me some of that crack you are smoking. Lolz.
Pawning off stuff in the stupid broad ass "numbers we are talking about"? Double lolz.
I could take it to deflation if that 'wood' syatisfy your 'noodle'...
