(09-03-2024 07:42 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Much like ‘I saw a boarding ceremony at Bagram’ is ‘I was deployed to Afghanistan while in the military’. Even more so given his known trip to the area while in Congress.

And just to put a final bow in this part of the nothingburger, Walz was introduced at that speaking event as a Congressman who was in Afghanistan for the ramping ceremony.

But hey, he didn't clarify that again for the MAGA slime like TA to not be confused 12 years later.

(09-03-2024 07:44 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-03-2024 07:42 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2024 07:28 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-03-2024 01:32 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2024 12:14 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I've said it before...

Walz could've said he served 24 years, with him already being retired once and coming back in after 9/11 and it would've been fine..

He could've stated he retired as a Sergeant Major and again an eye not be batted.. Could've even said he almost achieved the rank of CSM...

The problem is him claiming a rank he only achieved in title.. Claiming he was deployed to active war zones when he didn't.. Those are the issues in my mind..

So I should **** on my neighbor, who achieved Captain (for 1.5 years), yet retired as Commander (under the regs), because he has noted he was a Captain? Seriously?

And in all honesty, I do have an issue in his campaign where he said he bore 'weapons in war' --- when he was talking about the use of ARs in school shootings. It is a stretch. Not a big time massive one on its own. And one where he has admitted fault in his not well descriptive grammar.

But he never explicitly claimed to be "deployed to an active war zone" -- that part is *your* inaccurate expansion of his words. In a way that seemingly surpasses his inaccurate comments, in honesty.

If you are going to rip him for his not accurate claims, maybe you shouldnt make that accurate as to his actual comments. Not such equally inaccurate claims about his language as you do above. Now *that* is funny in retrospect...

“Inaccurate claims”
You ever try that chit in court? If you’ve actually ever been in one as a real lawyer.

Hate to tell you, pumkin, that ‘carrying a weapon in war’ is not ‘I was deployed to Afghanistan.’

Much like ‘I saw a boarding ceremony at Bagram’ is ‘I was deployed to Afghanistan while in the military’. Even more so given his known trip to the area while in Congress.

But keep jumping up and down and windmilling those tiny hands furiously trying to make those comments into what you want them to mean…. And by describing them in an amazingly rhetorical and highly inaccurate manner.

lol.

Oh, that’s when you aren’t reverting to your mean of highly retarded Beavis comments bereft of any substance. Classic.

You’re so damned easy

"Oh, that’s when you aren’t reverting to your mean of highly retarded Beavis comments bereft of any substance. Classic."

I see the AI bot user is back

Walz is a tranny enabling, baby murdering, horse “loving” creep who needs an entire box of tampons shoved up his ass. Imagine him and Kamala trying to implement a national lockdown the way he did in Minnesota

We need a VP who is not so good at explaining himself? OK.
Maybe one that just turns and walks away when asked about very important foreign events?
Why is one like JD Vance that does answer questions is to be hated?
How about a president that won’t answer any questions? One that could craft a world class word salad in a war centered conversation with Putin is to be praised by the left?
It amazes me what the left will accept because of ginned up hatred.
They hate the wrong man.

(09-04-2024 08:52 AM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote:  I see the AI bot user is back

Yes, we noticed...and smelled you. Not sure why you felt the need to announce it.

RWT has 59 posts on this thread. That's 11.46% of the total posts. As ABBA might sing "you are the POSTING Queen". RWT absolutely LIVES on the CSNBBS.

(09-04-2024 09:07 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  We need a VP who is not so good at explaining himself? OK.
Maybe one that just turns and walks away when asked about very important foreign events?
Why is one like JD Vance that does answer questions is to be hated?
How about a president that won’t answer any questions? One that could craft a world class word salad in a war centered conversation with Putin is to be praised by the left?
It amazes me what the left will accept because of ginned up hatred.
They hate the wrong man.

Walz is a creepy piece of garbage who beats his retarded kid

MAGA slime? I may change my user name to that. Has a nice ring.