So apparently, the left has been going around saying if Trump is reelected, that a group of people will carry out Project 2025. From what I've read of it, it's the usual fear mongering from the left about Christian Nationalism, authoritarianism (which is hilarious since the left is way more authoritarian the right), and about creating an autocracy (which is a dictatorship, which the left wants).

Has anyone else read it or looked into it?

The dems need another boogeyman to scare its electorate into actually showing up to vote.

Genuine Christians don’t want Christian nationalism because of disagreements we have amongst ourselves & you can’t force it, it’s an individual heart thing, you can’t force people to check a box to become a Christian & even then it's just checking a box. Any Christian nationalism must be attained at the individual level thru the work of the Holy Spirit.

Those wanting to force “Christian nationalism” are usually people who like some of the moral law & that’s the extent of it.

Next up, proclamations that people will leave the country if Trump is elected.

The irony of that is 90% of those who say that would not be missed for a second.

(07-02-2024 09:14 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  


Next up, proclamations that people will leave the country if Trump is elected.

The irony of that is 90% of those who say that would not be missed for a second.

Any 99% of those that say such nonsense will not go anywhere.

I imagine 2025- 2029 will be non-stop b!tching and whining from liberals.

"Project 2025 is a conservative policy initiative launched by the Heritage Foundation. The project's stated goal is to prepare a comprehensive plan for implementing conservative policies across the federal government, should a Republican candidate win the presidency in 2024.

Key aspects of Project 2025 include:

1. Developing detailed policy proposals across various government agencies and departments.

2. Creating a database of potential conservative appointees for thousands of government positions.

3. Preparing strategies to quickly implement policy changes in the early days of a new administration.

4. Focusing on areas such as reducing the size of government, promoting conservative social values, and reshaping federal agencies."

Project 2025 is a thing but unsure if Trump would implement it.

(07-02-2024 09:30 AM)fsquid Wrote:  Project 2025 is a thing but unsure if Trump would implement it.

Quote:trump has endorsed a number of the Project 2025 ideas in his speeches and on his website, although his campaign has said the candidate has the final say on policy.

Many of the proposals would face immediate legal challenges if implemented.

Project 2025: The trump presidency wish list, explained

If it makes the libs melt down, scream and they oppose it, then it must be good for America and I’m for it.

Fk the left

(07-02-2024 09:21 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I imagine 2025- 2029 will be non-stop b!tching and whining from liberals.

It will be equally annoying and entertaining.

Just think about all the "trumped up" conspiracies the Dems had from 16'-20' and multiply that by 4. They will try to impeach him 5 or 6 times at least.



The temper tantrums from the AOC's of the world are gonna be EPIC!

(07-02-2024 09:21 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I imagine 2025- 2029 will be non-stop b!tching and whining from liberals.

You win the White House, you have to put up with the other side throwing a tantrum every day.

Although I suppose the Left usually is throwing a tantrum anyways

(07-02-2024 09:21 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  I imagine 2025- 2029 will be non-stop b!tching and whining from liberals.

And that would be any different from when????

Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

(07-02-2024 09:51 AM)mlb Wrote:  Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

Ain't happening.

(07-02-2024 09:54 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(07-02-2024 09:51 AM)mlb Wrote:  Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

Ain't happening.

Unfortunately I know. Didn't happen in 2017 either.

God willing...

(07-02-2024 09:57 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(07-02-2024 09:54 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(07-02-2024 09:51 AM)mlb Wrote:  Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

Ain't happening.

Unfortunately I know. Didn't happen in 2017 either.

It makes you wonder if Trump tried but went about it the wrong way, or he really didn't try the last time. IMO he went about it the wrong way when he had the stick his first two years. Did he learn his lesson?

If he wins, and the R's gain control Congress and Senate (which is at least a possibility), I think he will be more wary of trying to negotiate with the D's who have clearly proven they will spin around and give him the shaft the second they have a chance.

Then, if he gets to place 2-3 more SCOTUS seats... whoa...

(07-02-2024 09:51 AM)mlb Wrote:  Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

Really needs to happen!! Get rid of a few of the agencies/departments (I'm looking at you DOEd), and a 10% cut across the board for 2 years then 5% for 2 years...

Won't happen, but a man can dream....

(07-02-2024 09:51 AM)mlb Wrote:  Shrinking the size of government and cutting the wasteful spending should be the first step. We've got to get the deficit under control ASAP.

Including the spending, you agree with? Just so we are clear....

$36,000 for 1
$72,000 for 2
$108,000 for 3
$144,000 for 4
$180,000 for 5 children you will get just because you have them and made under $400,000 and will cost 2.8 trillion till one child reaches age 18

How about the spending to help you pay for child care for the first 13 years of your children's life you want that cutout also? I believe in total, including the EIC and child care its 4.7 trillion if added up till a child reaches 18. So by the time a child reaches his tax paying years they had 4.7 trillion added that they must help pay back because their parent took a handout from the government

Or do you just want spending that you think should be cutout? A better question would be for you to describe "cutting the wasteful spending"?