(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Is like they installed Wi-Fi on the short bus for these two.

Is there actually any news to discuss on this topic? JFC.

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Maybe point out where Isaid anything of the sort, UStateSchool?

Or, maybe, type out what the judge actually said or did. You might find out you fairly misstated it there.

Quote:Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud

AGs fo that hundreds, nabbed thousands of times a year. I have no problem with revoking business licenses of people or entities who are found yo commit persistent fraud. I'll take it you font like that action ever being employed. Of isvit because the subject I'd Yrimp?

Quote:eny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

Alina had every opportunity to check that box. She didn't.

She had every opportunity to make the case a jury should be considered. She didn't

Please keep repeating those empty canards.

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

(10-10-2023 08:20 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

Bwhahahshahaha

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee

(10-10-2023 08:20 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:09 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  When the hole is dug deep enough I know who will be at the bottom. And he will still be arguing that he alone is right.

Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

Hardly, that'd be like 100+ times because you're an ignorant, petulant child. But I will report this post as discussing moderation issues in public. No, I actually won't.

Lastly, you do know your two utterances literally have nothing to do with each other, right? Of course you don't, you're still confused about what spell-check and word search are.

(10-09-2023 11:57 PM)banker Wrote:  Oh he who puts words in the mouths of other, please show me where I said that you said they would win the case. It’s weird that you just kind of make up the argument you want to fight. All my comment implied was that I believe (yes, bold people aren’t afraid to state their beliefs and opinions) that Trump will prevail, or get a wrist slap, on appeal and that we be interesting to watch you spin.

I don't have a reasoo spin a Trump victory here. I guess you don't understand quite shat you are saying when you say I will spin.

Quote:From reading your novellas, it’s obviously you believe the case has merit,

There is enough meat for it to potentially stick. And the state of Nisnt off their rocker to the extent everyone here believes.

No, it's not a frivolous exercise, and it's not a stretch legally or factually. By that definition of merit, yeah --- I think it passes that rather low bar.

I don't know how all the counts will turn out in the trial court of at the appellate level.

Quote:so it would be entertaining to watch you spin how that merit should have been enough because, you know, he is Trump and all that.

If Trump walks out of this he walks out of it. End of story in my book.

It's fairly entertaining to watch the Trump supporters throw every bit of regurgitated and made up slop at this.

Not necessarily you - I think you have a certain level of curiosity and might want to peel back some of the questions. You have asked some pretty insightful questions over the issue of count 1 -- count that falls outside the general pattern of private party fraud.

Some just regurgitate the garbage they are fed, and others simply interject wholly immaterial stuff all on their own and glib over what doesn't fit in their preconceptions.

(10-10-2023 08:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 08:20 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Again -- Please state exactly where I have said 'no matter what the state will win'? I dont remember making that comment.

Maybe you missed this one --- "The state could lose one or more of the remaining counts in this case -- absolutely. Or the state could lose some or all counts at appeal. That is also a possibility, no doubt."

You truly do have a serious comprehension issue, UStateSchool.

Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

Hardly, that'd be like 100+ times because you're an ignorant, petulant child. But I will report this post as discussing moderation issues in public. No, I actually won't.

You wont now because you got handed your butt on a platter by the mods after you got busted repeatedly punching that *report* button and have been warned about doing it again. And thats the ONLY reason you wont.

But lets get back to the issues of this case:

1. The DA believes Maralargo is worth $25million

2. There was no jury trial option for the fraud case, no matter how badly LeTanq James keeps dancing around that issue.

3. The judge is a fruitloop.

4. Tanq doesnt know if this trial is politically motivated, even though the DA campaigned on going after Trump.

(10-10-2023 08:34 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 08:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 08:20 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

Hardly, that'd be like 100+ times because you're an ignorant, petulant child. But I will report this post as discussing moderation issues in public. No, I actually won't.

You wont now because you got handed your butt on a platter by the mods after you got busted repeatedly punching that *report* button and have been warned about doing it again. And thats the ONLY reason you wont.

But lets get back to the issues of this case:

1. The DA believes Maralargo is worth $25million

The DA never mentioned any opinion on MAL.

Quote:2. There was no jury trial option for the fraud case, no matter how badly LeTanq James keeps dancing around that issue.

What exactly kept Alina from 'checking the box'? Was that box deleted out of her copy of the preprinted form?

What exactly kept Alina from checking the box and arguing for a jury for the portions that were at equity?

There actually some actions here that are at equity -- that a jury does not render judgement. And some actions that are at law -- where a jury can. At the very least, a jury can act as a finder of fact.

Alina never checked the box. Alina never tried to put it in a motion to argue. When she well could have. And from I gather in similar cases from colleagues in NY -- that is done consistently.

And on top of that above, the judge specifically mentioned at the beginning -- 'I see no party asked for a jury'.

Quote:3. The judge is a fruitloop.

Could very well be. ANd this means.... in your rantfest.... exactly.... what

Quote:4. Tanq doesnt know if this trial is politically motivated,

More of I dont give a ****. If it happens that Trump walks, then it will appear that the state stretched the case. If it happens that Trump gets popped, then I have zero problem with a fraudster losing their license to do business in a state. But then I would feel the second prong for any person not named Trump as well.

Quote:even though the DA campaigned on going after Trump.

There was no campaign promise by the DA in the case to go after Trump. (Cant wait to see how high UStateSchool jumps out of his knickers at that response)

(10-10-2023 08:34 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 08:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 08:20 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 06:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-09-2023 09:57 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Now you are flailing so badly that you cant even keep straight which sh*tbird is schooling your ass.

$25million for the Maralargo valuation.

Let's remove Trump and his kids from their companies for fraud and deny them a jury trial. Yea, thats constitutional.

AG LaTanq James campaigns on going after Trump, brings up this ridiculous case and gets ridiculed by the left and right, and you dont know if its political or not?

You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room. Sit down.

Tom: "You and your sycophants couldn't school romper room."

Also Tom: Goes crying to a mod anytime I mention "insurance deductibles."

Hardly, that'd be like 100+ times because you're an ignorant, petulant child. But I will report this post as discussing moderation issues in public. No, I actually won't.

You wont now because you got handed your butt on a platter by the mods after you got busted repeatedly punching that *report* button and have been warned about doing it again. And thats the ONLY reason you wont.

But lets get back to the issues of this case:

1. The DA believes Maralargo is worth $25million

2. There was no jury trial option for the fraud case, no matter how badly LeTanq James keeps dancing around that issue.

3. The judge is a fruitloop.

4. Tanq doesnt know if this trial is politically motivated, even though the DA campaigned on going after Trump.

Yall are doing a public service keeping him engaged. The more he is here spouting his reeeeeeeee the better off the rest of the world

You guys are gonna make him mad again.

(10-10-2023 09:20 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys are gonna make him mad again.

More entertained by the ignorant idiots around here who happily regurgitate slop.

And cant forget the second level of ignorant idiots that seemingly can do nothing but talk 7th grade smack with zero substance.

(10-10-2023 09:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 09:20 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys are gonna make him mad again.

More entertained by the ignorant idiots around here who happily regurgitate slop.

And cant forget the second level of ignorant idiots that seemingly can do nothing but talk 7th grade smack with zero substance.

It's absolutely stunning the lengths they go to protect and cover for dear leader. I actually think they believe that he gives two ***** about them.

#ETTD

(10-10-2023 08:34 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  You wont now because you got handed your butt on a platter by the mods after you got busted repeatedly punching that *report* button and have been warned about doing it again. And thats the ONLY reason you wont.

Surprise, yet another thing you're wrong about and don't know the first thing about. Typical. That didn't have a ******* thing to do with you.

Perhaps you can expound for us how you know so much about what the moderators here do and have done?

One day, Tanq is going to wake up and sh*t his bed when he realizes that he, DavidSt, and RedWingTom were all on the same page for so long.........

(10-10-2023 09:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 09:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2023 09:20 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys are gonna make him mad again.

More entertained by the ignorant idiots around here who happily regurgitate slop.

And cant forget the second level of ignorant idiots that seemingly can do nothing but talk 7th grade smack with zero substance.

It's absolutely stunning the lengths they go to protect and cover for dear leader. I actually think they believe that he gives two ***** about them.

#ETTD

Your hypocrisy is showing, Ace

(10-10-2023 09:51 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  One day, Tanq is going to wake up and sh*t his bed when he realizes that he, DavidSt, and RedWingTom were all on the same page for so long.........

He’d blame it on the bed. Textbook narcissism. Textbook.

(10-10-2023 09:51 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  One day, Tanq is going to wake up and sh*t his bed when he realizes that he, DavidSt, and RedWingTom were all on the same page for so long.........

Mensa is thankful for them.

(10-10-2023 09:51 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  One day, Tanq is going to wake up and sh*t his bed when he realizes that he, DavidSt, and RedWingTom were all on the same page for so long.........

Please tell us this gamut and world of issues I am in lockstep with the two on. I'm interested to see this deep well of issue