(06-11-2023 09:39 PM)ENCterrapin Wrote: (06-11-2023 06:31 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote: (06-11-2023 06:14 PM)Jhawkinva Wrote: (06-11-2023 05:04 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote: (06-11-2023 03:48 PM)XLance Wrote: Uh-huh.
VT certainly seems to have more football enthusiasm, though it's hard to rank them ahead of UVA for Realignment purposes even so. One thing that I will say is that VT seems to be a whole lot stronger in Virginia than NC St is in North Carolina.
I think UVA is clearly the more likely to be sought. But I also think VT would deliver more TV dollars, and would better fit the SEC culture.
It's interesting, I think that we'll go after UVA simply to thwart the B1G, but if we have to "settle" for VT then it will feel kind of like a win. Which is very different from UNC/NC St. There's only one (public) school that matters in North Carolina.
You have obviously made up your mind about NC state. UNC is the top school and has a national following, I won't argue that at all, but I see a heck of a lot of support for NC state on a daily basis. IF NC state were to be invited to the SEC, with the benefits that come from being in that conference and time to integrate, I think you would be happily surprised with the program and the fan support.
I won't say it will never happen, but if UNC were to leave for the SEC/B1G without NC state having a spot in either (obviously the chances are vastly SEC over the B1G for the wolfpack) I will need a forklift to raise my jaw off the ground.
I have nothing at all against NC St. They're a strong school Academically and Athletically. However, they don't fit the mold of past SEC and B1G adds:
Penn St
Nebraska
Rutgers
Maryland
USC
UCLA
Arkansas
South Carolina
A&M
Missouri
OU
UT
All are flagships or flagship equivalents. Every B1G school was AAU at the time of the invite. NC State is not a flagship. They're not a flagship equivalent. They might not even be #2 in their own State. They're not AAU and very unlikely to get interest from the B1G, which leaves the SEC. For us, they're good but not so Elite in any sport that they can get by their shortcomings. It's probably easier to make a case for Duke if you want a 2nd NC school b/c they're all-time great in Basketball and Tier 1 in Academics, 2 things that the SEC could use more of. If we start looking at NC St-level schools then why wouldn't we look at 1/2 of the big 12?
UNC/Clemson/FSU are clearly good candidates for the P2. Miami and UVA decent candidates for the P2 and certainly either would be great to even out the numbers. VT is much more competitive with UVA in their state, it's reasonable to call them a co-flagship, and they'd make an excellent partner for UNC (as opposed to NC St, which gives you nothing that you don't already have with UNC). That's 6 ACC schools that are clearly more desirable than NC St.
Oh, one final nail in NC St's coffin: they've been last or next to last in athletic revenues in the ACC every year for the past 5 years.
I have nothing at all against NC St. They're a very good school, probably near the top of the list for the AAU, and they care a lot about sports and compete very well. They're just more of a Baylor, Ok St, TCU or Texas Tech level of program, and that type of program hasn't historically gotten a P2 invite.
edit: as for the "UNC leaving NC State behind" thing...UCLA left Cal. OU left OSU. A&M and then UT both left Texas Tech. Would the BoR really stop UNC from making an extra $30m++ per year? I think that they might if NC St was going to get dumped into the AAC or C-USA, but they'll have a soft landing spot in the rebuilt ACC, the big 12, or some combination of 2-3 of the M3. So it will be more like: "UNC can get $75m per year while NC St gets $45m per year, or they can both make $45m per year". At worst, the BoR would dump a tax on UNC like Cal's leeching off UCLA, but I think that even that is unlikely.