(01-19-2023 01:12 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 12:58 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(01-18-2023 08:00 PM)450bench Wrote:  The santos guy must be a closet liberal

Truly the worst crime a Republican can commit.

Could be right. The MAGAt right have gotten used to and accepted, thanks to Trumpty Dumpty, the lies, the grifting, the theft, and likely the crimes. But one thing that will not be tolerated is a man wearing tasteful dress.... It doesn't matter if that dress is matched with dangling earrings, well applied ruby lipstick, and professional quality makeup. Groomer? They claim they're protecting the children but I suspect they're protecting themselves.

Says supporters of the party that tries to vilify or claim people of color are props if they are Conservative.

(01-19-2023 12:58 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(01-18-2023 08:00 PM)450bench Wrote:  The santos guy must be a closet liberal

Truly the worst crime a Republican can commit.

Well that is the one reason that would matter most to a voter. Did they lie about how they are going to vote?

(01-19-2023 01:18 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 11:32 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 10:56 AM)b2b Wrote:  I'm not going to try to defend this idiot. Both parties need to purge themselves of pieces of like this.

^^^ Ding ding ding

I'm fine with that and agree... but as I said, it seems the mechanisms for that don't yet exist... and all of these 'let's just do something' comments like denying him a comittee assignment are just stupid.

He was elected... he has a job to do. If you want to remove him, that's fine... but you can't 'make up' law in order to stop people from 'making up' their history.

Really. He made up stuff on his resume. Lots of people do that. Biden lies every single day he's allowed out about things he has done. Hillary was under sniper fire in Bosnia. Obama said one thing but whispered to the Russian that he would have more flexibility after the election, something far more relevant than the Santos resume. Politicans lie! Duh!!!

Let the voters take it out on him in 2 years.

Stealing money is a different issue. But lying to get elected??? Really??? Get serious.

Not my Congressman. We fired mine and replaced him with someone that we hope will go after what his other constituents and I want him to do and go after. He's got two years.

(01-19-2023 01:56 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

This may actually be technically true. Santo's former roommate and childhood friend, RocHard, (who is a professional drag queen) said that Santos never performed professionally. She claims that Santos didn't possess the talents necessary. So there you have it. What is Santos guilty of here? Santos never denied his appreciation of an eye catching dress. And I think we all can agree the proof is in that picture.

(01-19-2023 03:12 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  This may actually be technically true. Santo's former roommate and childhood friend, RocHard, (who is a professional drag queen) said that Santos never performed professionally. She claims that Santos didn't possess the talents necessary. So there you have it. What is Santos guilty of here? Santos never denied his appreciation of an eye catching dress. And I think we all can agree the proof is in that picture.

I could create that picture in photoshop

(01-19-2023 05:02 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 03:12 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  This may actually be technically true. Santo's former roommate and childhood friend, RocHard, (who is a professional drag queen) said that Santos never performed professionally. She claims that Santos didn't possess the talents necessary. So there you have it. What is Santos guilty of here? Santos never denied his appreciation of an eye catching dress. And I think we all can agree the proof is in that picture.

I could create that picture in photoshop

Who's this?..... about 30 seconds into the video.

"alleging"

Anyway, don't you have some trees to hug? Surely this is not your entire life now?

(01-19-2023 01:18 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 11:32 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 10:56 AM)b2b Wrote:  I'm not going to try to defend this idiot. Both parties need to purge themselves of pieces of like this.

^^^ Ding ding ding

I'm fine with that and agree... but as I said, it seems the mechanisms for that don't yet exist... and all of these 'let's just do something' comments like denying him a comittee assignment are just stupid.

He was elected... he has a job to do. If you want to remove him, that's fine... but you can't 'make up' law in order to stop people from 'making up' their history.

Article 1, Section 5, clause 2 seems to give Congress wide latitude in punishing members since it allows them to "make their own rules" in regard to the proceedings. I think Congress has the power to "purge" its membership from unethical members...it just won't do it for a variety of reasons..most being terrified of the outcome.

(01-21-2023 09:51 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 01:18 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 11:32 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 10:56 AM)b2b Wrote:  I'm not going to try to defend this idiot. Both parties need to purge themselves of pieces of like this.

^^^ Ding ding ding

I'm fine with that and agree... but as I said, it seems the mechanisms for that don't yet exist... and all of these 'let's just do something' comments like denying him a comittee assignment are just stupid.

He was elected... he has a job to do. If you want to remove him, that's fine... but you can't 'make up' law in order to stop people from 'making up' their history.

Article 1, Section 5, clause 2 seems to give Congress wide latitude in punishing members since it allows them to "make their own rules" in regard to the proceedings. I think Congress has the power to "purge" its membership from unethical members...it just won't do it for a variety of reasons..most being terrified of the outcome.

most live in glass houses so...

Wait, George Santos appeared with Hannah Montana?

(01-21-2023 11:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(01-21-2023 09:51 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 01:18 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 11:32 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-19-2023 10:56 AM)b2b Wrote:  I'm not going to try to defend this idiot. Both parties need to purge themselves of pieces of like this.

^^^ Ding ding ding

I'm fine with that and agree... but as I said, it seems the mechanisms for that don't yet exist... and all of these 'let's just do something' comments like denying him a comittee assignment are just stupid.

He was elected... he has a job to do. If you want to remove him, that's fine... but you can't 'make up' law in order to stop people from 'making up' their history.

Article 1, Section 5, clause 2 seems to give Congress wide latitude in punishing members since it allows them to "make their own rules" in regard to the proceedings. I think Congress has the power to "purge" its membership from unethical members...it just won't do it for a variety of reasons..most being terrified of the outcome.

most live in glass houses so...

Good assumption.