(04-20-2022 01:59 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

Lol

Yea, that reads entirely like an unbiased, neutral “opinionator”.

It sounds more like a draft of a legal defense.

“How much of Durham conspiracy theories will be allowed”, or whatever the direct quote is.

GTFOOHWTS

Apologies that she communicates at a level above your understanding.

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Very good synopsis.

And unfortunately I agree 100% with your eventual conclusion.

(04-20-2022 01:59 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

Lol

Yea, that reads entirely like an unbiased, neutral “opinionator”.

It sounds more like a draft of a legal defense.

“How much of Durham conspiracy theories will be allowed”, or whatever the direct quote is.

GTFOOHWTS

I read some of it and then I went to her Twitter page. This person is no legal expert in any world.

(04-20-2022 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 11:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

I don't need to believe anything as I don't have any vested interest in this. I don't give two ***** if Hillary broke any laws or whether she goes to jail or not. You guys, on the other hand, have a vested interest in needing to believe your cult leader. It's the only way you can continue to make it palatable. Sadly, your hope is linked to the failure of incompetence that is the years long Durham investigation.

For not “giving two chits” you sure are invested in this thread. You are so transparent it’s laughable, dude.

(04-20-2022 05:46 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 11:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

I don't need to believe anything as I don't have any vested interest in this. I don't give two ***** if Hillary broke any laws or whether she goes to jail or not. You guys, on the other hand, have a vested interest in needing to believe your cult leader. It's the only way you can continue to make it palatable. Sadly, your hope is linked to the failure of incompetence that is the years long Durham investigation.

For not “giving two chits” you sure are invested in this thread. You are so transparent it’s laughable, dude.

I don't give two ***** what happens to Hillary. Try to keep up. As for making you guys look like clowns. I'm here for that...all day!

(04-21-2022 07:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 05:46 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 11:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

I don't need to believe anything as I don't have any vested interest in this. I don't give two ***** if Hillary broke any laws or whether she goes to jail or not. You guys, on the other hand, have a vested interest in needing to believe your cult leader. It's the only way you can continue to make it palatable. Sadly, your hope is linked to the failure of incompetence that is the years long Durham investigation.

For not “giving two chits” you sure are invested in this thread. You are so transparent it’s laughable, dude.

I don't give two ***** what happens to Hillary. Try to keep up. As for making you guys look like clowns. I'm here for that..all day!

after losing Mach, ewe went from mini me to ……….. well, just keep churning mo’ butterererer…

#pats

addendum: everyone serves a ‘purpose’

Tom sounds nervous.

(04-21-2022 08:17 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Tom sounds nervous.

its’ holier-than-thou ‘rube-tube’ always has that as the ‘mean kempf’ ingredient in mother hubbards’…