(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

let it be stated - let it be ignored - rwt (resident board PD working pro bono)

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

Sorry but they have the documents that prove the CIA determined the BS that he presented to the FBI was manufactured and worthless. So who did this? Who’s idea was it? Strange that Sussman would come up with this idea on his own and then bill Clinton for it after the fact.

(04-20-2022 07:38 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

Sorry but they have the documents that prove the CIA determined the BS that he presented to the FBI was manufactured and worthless. So who did this? Who’s idea was it? Strange that Sussman would come up with this idea on his own and then bill Clinton for it after the fact.

Lots of things could be considered strange...but that does not pass the level of criminality, dude! You have to prove Sussman knew he was lying, and you'd have to prove Hillary instructed him to either lie or pursue what he did.

And in case you weren't aware, Durham has been at this for years...yet Hillary is not the one going to trial here, Sussman is.

Pretend all you wish, Tom. No one can deprive you of your own fairy-tale fantasies. But for the rest of us operating in reality, we know what double standards are at play when it comes to the Clintons.

I am sure that my business is one of many that have been subjected to subpoena responses - - a most unwelcome interference everytime it has happened. But, unlike the Clintons, if I had simply destroyed records and then claimed that they only related to my daughter's wedding, I would have been hauled in front of a judge, fined and possibly imprisoned. Because my name is not Clinton.

I give lots of grief to the Trump apologists on this forum. But his sins are equivalent to sticking chewing gum under your desk in comparison to the cheating scandals of the Clinton mafia.

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Tom sure does twist himself into knots to try to show he's not a Democrat. He'll jump all over Republicans but defend Democrats at every turn. Strange.

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

HA! Such a liar.

(04-20-2022 08:14 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Pretend all you wish, Tom. No one can deprive you of your own fairy-tale fantasies. But for the rest of us operating in reality, we know what double standards are at play when it comes to the Clintons.

I am sure that my business is one of many that have been subjected to subpoena responses - - a most unwelcome interference everytime it has happened. But, unlike the Clintons, if I had simply destroyed records and then claimed that they only related to my daughter's wedding, I would have been hauled in front of a judge, fined and possibly imprisoned. Because my name is not Clinton.

I give lots of grief to the Trump apologists on this forum. But his sins are equivalent to sticking chewing gum under your desk in comparison to the cheating scandals of the Clinton mafia.

I'm not pretending anything, dude! I'm looking at facts and evidence...and so presumably is Durham...although he's doing a pretty shoddy job at that. Yet, nothing against Hillary. When there is, then we'll talk. And again, I don't give a **** if Hillary broke a law...if she did, lock her up. I have no vested interest in her. NONE. She lost the damned election. If she were on her second term, then yeah, I'd have some passing interest. But, she, isn't.

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

I interrupt Tom crapping his pants in this thread to give you all a little recent history on this.....

First, Tom wants to see evidence. The evidence has already been submitted. Durham has the actual text message from Sussman to Baker where he lied. Whats interesting about that is that, as Margot Cleveland points out, that may have been a recent acquisition by Durham. If Durham had this text message last year, he almost certainly would have used it against Sussman. But if its a recent acquisition, then why did he not have it beforehand? Baker's communications were under subpoena. That would mean Baker failed to turn over a phone or communications he was under court order to provide. We dont know how Durham ended up getting this damning smoking gun text, but he got it. But he couldnt use it because he had already filed charges against Sussman and hadnt provided this as evidence.

Until Sussman did a stupid thing. In his motion to dismiss, Sussman went overboard in his allegations against Durham. Jonathan Turley warned that Sussman could open himself up to additional evidence being brought against him. And it happened. Sussman basically "impeached" himself in his suit to drop the charges. If Sussman had kept his mouth shut, Durham may not have been able to use the text message against Sussman. When he opened his mouth, he opened the avenue for Durham to bring it into evidence. Which happened.

The really big deal on Sussman is that he is the first Clinton-attorney-bagman that a prosecutor has been able to pierce the umbrella of attorney-client privilege, which was being abused by the Clintons. The next Clinton-attorney-cronie to likely go down is Marc Elias.

Baker himself may also be in trouble now if he failed to turn that text message from Sussman over. We will likely find out in the coming weeks how Durham got ahold of that text message, which will give insite as to Baker being in hot water.

(04-20-2022 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:14 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Pretend all you wish, Tom. No one can deprive you of your own fairy-tale fantasies. But for the rest of us operating in reality, we know what double standards are at play when it comes to the Clintons.

I am sure that my business is one of many that have been subjected to subpoena responses - - a most unwelcome interference everytime it has happened. But, unlike the Clintons, if I had simply destroyed records and then claimed that they only related to my daughter's wedding, I would have been hauled in front of a judge, fined and possibly imprisoned. Because my name is not Clinton.

I give lots of grief to the Trump apologists on this forum. But his sins are equivalent to sticking chewing gum under your desk in comparison to the cheating scandals of the Clinton mafia.

I'm not pretending anything, dude! I'm looking at facts and evidence...and so presumably is Durham...although he's doing a pretty shoddy job at that. Yet, nothing against Hillary. When there is, then we'll talk. And again, I don't give a **** if Hillary broke a law...if she did, lock her up. I have no vested interest in her. NONE. She lost the damned election. If she were on her second term, then yeah, I'd have some passing interest. But, she, isn't.

Unless you have some kind of insider access to information that no one else on this forum has, you are NOT looking at facts and evidence. You are looking at a blatant cover up - - one in which Cheryl Mills (a central player in destroying the evidence) is given immunity and allowed to sit in on the investigators' interview into the destroyed evidence.

The Clintons are dirty beyond belief, yet they will get away with it.

And you know this. You're not dumb Tom - - that's Marc Mensa's problem. Your sin here is worse. You are being dishonest.

(04-20-2022 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:14 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Pretend all you wish, Tom. No one can deprive you of your own fairy-tale fantasies. But for the rest of us operating in reality, we know what double standards are at play when it comes to the Clintons.

I am sure that my business is one of many that have been subjected to subpoena responses - - a most unwelcome interference everytime it has happened. But, unlike the Clintons, if I had simply destroyed records and then claimed that they only related to my daughter's wedding, I would have been hauled in front of a judge, fined and possibly imprisoned. Because my name is not Clinton.

I give lots of grief to the Trump apologists on this forum. But his sins are equivalent to sticking chewing gum under your desk in comparison to the cheating scandals of the Clinton mafia.

I'm not pretending anything, dude! I'm looking at facts and evidence...and so presumably is Durham...although he's doing a pretty shoddy job at that. Yet, nothing against Hillary. When there is, then we'll talk. And again, I don't give a **** if Hillary broke a law...if she did, lock her up. I have no vested interest in her. NONE. She lost the damned election. If she were on her second term, then yeah, I'd have some passing interest. But, she, isn't.

no ewe’re not … what’s amusing is ewe cannot/will not put everyone on ignore, nor ignore the ones ewe have (on ignore)…

@shiteStinks,Ja?!

#earnedTenuredManure

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

You should give this gentleman a read. He breaks this down in simple little Facts for us common Folks. https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog.

(04-20-2022 10:56 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

You should give this gentleman a read. He breaks this down in simple little Facts for us common Folks. https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog.

Techno Fog is great. Here's a current one, that shows the Clintons are still trying to hide behind attorney-cronie privilege. They are now saying that Fusion GPS was providing "legal advice" and therefore fusion gps falls under attorney client privilege.

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

(04-20-2022 11:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

I don't need to believe anything as I don't have any vested interest in this. I don't give two ***** if Hillary broke any laws or whether she goes to jail or not. You guys, on the other hand, have a vested interest in needing to believe your cult leader. It's the only way you can continue to make it palatable. Sadly, your hope is linked to the failure of incompetence that is the years long Durham investigation.

(04-20-2022 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 11:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 08:25 AM)Oman Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

The Clintons have been at this for far to long to expect anything will stick to them. But it's beyond reason to believe the Dossier and the subsequent Alpha bank hoax that were paid for by her campaign were perpetrated without her knowledge. The Clinton campaign invented foreign collusion with Russia, lied to the FBI and other intelligence services to create an official investigation, and the complicit main-stream media bought it hook & line.

No, Hillary will never be charged, this can be dragged out for decades, immunity claimed, records destroyed, witnesses die.. But let's not pretend there's nothing to see here.

Dude, just stop. Sussman <> The Clinton Campaign! The only ones pretending here are the ones who want to claim a conspiracy without evidence. That's really no different than what you're accusing her of...claiming trump colluded with Russia. Do better.

no, they are not the same, but no one (probably including you) believe Sussman did this on his own. The campaign paid for all of it, and likely directed it to a very large degree.

As is stated Hillary will likely never be actually tied to it... at least not legally. but Sussman was a part of the firm that is neck deep with the DNC and the campaign. MAYBE it's all coincidence that Perkins Coie is behind all this fabricated collusion stuff and it has nothing to do with the the campaign.. but you don't really believe that.

I don't need to believe anything as I don't have any vested interest in this. I don't give two ***** if Hillary broke any laws or whether she goes to jail or not. You guys, on the other hand, have a vested interest in needing to believe your cult leader. It's the only way you can continue to make it palatable. Sadly, your hope is linked to the failure of incompetence that is the years long Durham investigation.

ewe continue to state such, yet continue to post on subject matters ewe don’t care about … that’s as lonesome dove masochistic as it gets, juggalo…

#impressvelyLimp

(04-20-2022 07:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:58 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(04-20-2022 06:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2022 06:47 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The evil witch Hillary and her flying-monkey cabal will never see actual justice in our lifetimes. But history will remember her as a traitor to our nation and a villain of epic proportions.

So, when Durham completes his years long witch hunt finding no evidence other than a possible lie by an attorney but doesn't show Hillary did anything, or anything illegal, that would not be actual justice for her?

Why not, because you don't get to live out your fantasy of her in cuffs?

Okay.

Tom, that's a lot of words to express the uncaring arrogance of the progressive mindset. Just go with the tried and true, from the mouth of the demonic witch herself:

"What difference at this point does it make?"

Lazy.

I have no love for Hillary, Democrats, nor the DNC. If they're guilty of crimes, punish them...I don't give a ****. SHOW THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE!

But no, you don't just get to say...oh well...I know she did something!

Your problem here is that this case is incredible flimsy. Durham has been a disaster and a lot of this may not even see the courtroom.

Here's a great blog that lays all it out in great detail. We'll know a lot more in the coming weeks as the judge rules on what actually can be used in the trial.

Quote:There have been a slew of developments in the Michael Sussmann case, and in advance of two of them, I wanted to lay out what the posture of the case is. One thing that those swooping in for the conspiracy theories seem to miss is that what happens between now and the trial — scheduled to start on May 16, though Durham is trying a number of stunts to delay it — will be dictated by a bunch of rules, and no matter how guilty or innocent or sleazy-but-not-criminal you think Sussmann is (and I think one can make the case for any of the three), the evidence the jury will see will be decided in the next few weeks according to the rules of criminal procedure.

The questions to be decided in the next few weeks are, generally, the following:

- Whether to penalize Durham for breaking the rules
- Whether the Alfa Bank DNS anomaly is real and whether the inferences about it are reasonable
- Whether Judge Christopher Cooper will review privilege claims
- How much of Durham’s conspiracy theories will be admitted
- Whether to immunize Rodney Joffe

THE POSTURE OF THE MICHAEL SUSSMANN CASE

Lol

Yea, that reads entirely like an unbiased, neutral “opinionator”.

It sounds more like a draft of a legal defense.

“How much of Durham conspiracy theories will be allowed”, or whatever the direct quote is.

GTFOOHWTS