She answered the same question two different ways, first saying she couldn’t say and then saying “not to my knowledge”. Ted should have followed up at that point to say “if it were the case that federal agents or their sources incited violence would that be something that would normally be part of your knowledge”. It’s a good trap question, if she says no, you’ll ask who you should be asking, if she says yes then you say “so you acknowledge that type of activity takes place. Within your knowledge then when has that tactic been used?”

Who is she protecting? If there were none there then you simply say so. If you are cornered you refuse to answer the question.

(01-11-2022 01:43 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Who is she protecting? If there were none there then you simply say so. If you are cornered you refuse to answer the question.

She won’t answer the question because it destroys the agenda which is to justify turning the federal government against political enemies and U.S. citizens through means of multiple ‘Reichstag fires’

(01-11-2022 01:43 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Who is she protecting? If there were none there then you simply say so. If you are cornered you refuse to answer the question.

Maybe herself, she might just get suicided. It's not like the NeoGestapo is playing fair anymore.

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

lulz

"he told us he wasnt a fed"

Trust me bro.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

(01-11-2022 06:41 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

lulz

"he told us he wasnt a fed"

That's beyond ludicrous. By that logic Trump should have just been able to say "I didn't collude with the Russians". End of interview.

Kinzinger and the Jan 6th committee not having a good day trying to clean the Ray Epps mess up.

(01-11-2022 06:41 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

lulz

"he told us he wasnt a fed"

Sounds a lot like our bud Tommie Boy. Well, the accused said he didn't do it. You believed him?

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

Then why is he not in jail and charged with a crime. There is more than sufficient probable cause.

(01-11-2022 06:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Kinzinger and the Jan 6th committee not having a good day trying to clean the Ray Epps mess up.

So why didn’t she just say so?

They can only convince the sheeple with this low IQ rhetoric.

(01-11-2022 01:43 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Who is she protecting? If there were none there then you simply say so. If you are cornered you refuse to answer the question.

Protecting?

The bureaucracy. It’s what career bureaucrats do.

And, we are beholden to them. They are all the smart people.

(01-12-2022 02:32 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

Then why is he not in jail and charged with a crime. There is more than sufficient probable cause.

Reminder: the CIA is not a law enforcement agency.

If Epps broke no laws on January 6th, then Trump most certainly did not either

(01-11-2022 06:41 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-11-2022 04:15 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

lulz

"he told us he wasnt a fed"