(09-17-2021 08:20 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-16-2021 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-16-2021 01:38 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Tom, you POSTED in the DAMN THREAD FROM YESTERDAY!!! So quit hiding behind the "show me the story" bull****, because
1) You read it and already KNOW you're lying
2) You behaved like a damn pavlovian experiment, heard the 'word' "FRAUD" and made your Bs "provisional ballots' argument

https://csnbbs.com/thread-929385.html


That does not deny the fact that someone VOTED using someone else's name .. That by definition is FRAUD.

WTF are you talking about? That thread is for a GP story that makes the claim "they were all republicans" with no evidence...and it also says that many voters were told this.

I asked for a link to the posters claim that 70% of voters had this issue at a polling place.

And NO, merely being told a vote has already been cast in your name IS NOT fraud...at least not until it can be investigated. And I already provided information from the counties with explanations of what happened. It was a machine error in one county that was quickly corrected and it was voters themselves not realizing they had already mailed in a ballot in the others.

It was NOT wide spread, it was NOT only republicans, and it was not 2.5+ million votes!

My God, are we really this far gone that we can't even comprehend basic facts but rather just closed eyes and ears while we scream at the top of our lungs.

This place has gone mad.

Why? I know it’s a useless question to ask you, but to answer it myself; the election process is broken. Most Americans see this regardless of party affiliation. You communist and the progressive idiots who blindly follow are not interested in securing the process just allowing more insecurity. As long as these stories have to be explained as ‘human error’, ‘machine malfunction’ or that the fraud ‘hasn’t been investigated’ by those who perpetrated it most Americans won’t believe elections are secure.

This is completely ignorant of my prior comments and positions on elections. I'm for voter ID and am in complete agreement that our elections need more money to secure them and more money to make things easier and better.

The problem IMO is that the GOP is more interested in things that will just get them elected rather than addressing the problem. The know full well that the electorate is not with them, if turnout increases, they lose.

Just stop.

(09-16-2021 01:10 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Tom, you keep believing that. You've proven that you're a short bus person over and over and a disinformation specialist.

The poll worker at one of the polls reported that 70% of those coming in were told they had already voted. Nothing to see here, no no no.

It's so cute that you are always on the scene in a jiffy to defend any leftist entity that is accused of funny business, esp. in a blue state. They aren't paying you enough.

As I said earlier, complete horseshit.

Quote:There has been no evidence of widespread fraud, and other major candidates in the race have acknowledged Newsom’s win. But online, some people are suggesting election fraud, claiming 70% of voters were told they already voted when they went to cast their ballot.

“We saw lots of fraud. Certain polling locations reported 70% of people walking in had already voted!” read a since-deleted Sept. 15 Instagram post that accumulated more than 3,000 likes within a day.

But the claim is false. While two polling locations in California experienced a technical error, the volume of people affected by the glitch is nowhere near the number cited by Afshar and the social media posts. And no voters were prevented from voting because of it.

Our rating: False
Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that 70% of voters who showed up to some California polling locations were told they had already voted. While voters at two polling locations were told they had already participated in the election, the issue was quickly resolved and voters were given provisional ballots. A total of 103 provisional ballots were processed in total due to the glitch, and the California secretary of state's office said the 70% figure is incorrect.

Fact check: False claim that many California voters were told they already voted

A Fact Checker said it was false?

You are so gullible. We all understand how 'fact checkers' work. They are a creation and a creature of the left. Like the left, they are massive liars.

That's fine. You do you and I'll laugh at your stupidity.

Riddle me this. Give me an example of fact checkers checking on something said by a democrat.

I'll wait. Might even take a long nap because I know what you will find.

You know he constantly pats himself on the back thinking he got something over on us. Poor tom.

(09-22-2021 04:38 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  A Fact Checker said it was false?

You are so gullible. We all understand how 'fact checkers' work. They are a creation and a creature of the left. Like the left, they are massive liars.

That's fine. You do you and I'll laugh at your stupidity.

Riddle me this. Give me an example of fact checkers checking on something said by a democrat.

I'll wait. Might even take a long nap because I know what you will find.

Honest question, what will it take for you to believe that 70% of voters at a location were not told they had already voted then?

Your source for your original claim was what? The Instagram post that my article says was later deleted? The poll worker? If so, what's his name? What was the polling location? The Newsmax interview where Emon Afshar alleged an unnamed election worker told him that?

You can poo poo the fact checkers all you want, but they do at least provide sources for their claims. In this case, it was direct officials of the state and county.

Quote:“The 70% reference is incorrect and unsubstantiated – location-specific or broadly,” said Jenna Dresner, a spokesperson for the California secretary of state’s office.

Afshar and the posters did not return a request for comment.

Quote:In total, the two affected polling locations processed 103 provisional ballots, 56 at one and 47 at the other, while other voters chose to go to an alternate location, according to Dresner. She said issues were identified with 91 electronic poll book devices out of 1,510 deployed for the election. They were the result of an error in the loading sequence by their vendor.

Quote:Los Angeles County Registrar Office spokesman Mike Sanchez also said the 70% figure is incorrect, and that the issue was "quickly resolved and voting was continuous.”

"Provisional ballots were verified and included in the election night tally," Sanchez said via email.

Some voters told local news outlet KTLA5 they were suspicious because many of those affected by the technical issue were self-identified Republicans, but the election issue could have affected any voter. Dresner said it was an "isolated incident."

Do you have direct evidence that they are lying? This goes back to much of what we saw in November. Just because something isn't easily explained or is not understood by people without extensive knowledge of election procedures does not mean it was nefarious or fraudulent!

Yes, their lips are moving, therefore they're lying.

(09-23-2021 10:02 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Yes, their lips are moving, therefore they're lying.

But the random internet guy or deleted Instagram poster or unnamed poll worker who supposedly claimed 70% of voters were told they couldn't vote...and just random social media posts...they were all telling the truth. Not the people with facts at their disposal who go on record...they're the liars.

Got it.

Is this really how we want to deal with things in society guys? Only believing things that fit your world view or narrative? Not saying I'm perfect here either, but this ones pretty cut and dried. Especially when the recall lost by over 3 million votes!

SMH