(09-16-2021 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: WTF are you talking about? That thread is for a GP story that makes the claim "they were all republicans" with no evidence...and it also says that many voters were told this.
See this is what pisses you off Tom.. The GP story is TWO LINKS to two local stories that state fraud/bad votes/identity "theft" (for the lack of a better term) happened....and it stated that they were in a
predominantly republican district. Note, it didn't say "All".
Note: Not once did I say it was 2.5 million people, but as you used my quote for this... I said FRAUD happened.
So how much fraud is enough fraud for you to not turn a blind eye to it? (1 million? 100,000? 15? )
I'll bet if you were to go to your polling place and you were told you already voted (and again, it happened to me my VERY FIRST year I moved to Missouri and voted here), you'd be pissed. I even asked them when i supposedly voted... (They couldn't tell me).
Oh wait, no you wouldn't you apparently don't give a damn about ANY election integrity as long as you win NONE, ZILCH, NADA
Quote:And NO, merely being told a vote has already been cast in your name IS NOT fraud...at least not until it can be investigated.
Again, WRONG, wrong, wrong. My name is on record as having voted. I didn't vote absentee, Therefore someone in the state of Missouri defrauded my vote.
That is plain and simple, Fraud.
Want to play this game again, as I've already called you out on your hijack claim:
Code:
FRAUD: wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
There's no statement in there that says "
proven[ wrongful deception".
Someone pretended to be me, and I caused a ruckus about it, and it's never happened again.
Quote:And I already provided information from the counties with explanations of what happened. It was a machine error in one county that was quickly corrected and it was voters themselves not realizing they had already mailed in a ballot in the others.
No you didn't... you put up one twitter post from one person that tried to go after the people who were concerned about fraudulent activity in California.
Again, I tried to stayed out of the Arizona audit issue (other than, it took too damn long, and wasn't going to change anything), because I didn't know enough, and saw too many people throwing numbers that were being thrown around, that it even made my head spin, so I could never get a grasp on it.
But this just line you're taking proves that you don't give a damn that fraud _happened_ (whether to the power of 1, 10, or if even was to the power of 1.5million (Which I dont' believe) because your preferred party stayed in power.