CliftonAve
Heisman
Posts: 21,942
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1183
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
|
RE: If the ACC must add one more team, what should it be?
(08-18-2021 06:34 PM)Statefan Wrote: (08-18-2021 06:20 PM)vabearcat Wrote: (08-18-2021 04:41 AM)XLance Wrote: (08-18-2021 04:06 AM)CardinalJim Wrote: (08-17-2021 08:51 PM)Schema Wrote: If Cincinnati were added, I would not be as concerned about how successful the Bearcats would be at recruiting against the B1G schools in the area, as I would be more interested in the increased exposure it gives my alma mater in the state of Ohio. Now, I know Ohioans are already familiar with the state of South Carolina because they are required by law to vacation in Myrtle Beach, but still, if Cincinnati were in the ACC, there would be more exposure for Clemson in the state of Ohio.
Of course, the same would be true of Texas if TCU were a member. However, I really would not want to have a single school that far out there without another school or two or three with them. So, for the sake of this poll only asking about a single team, that is why I'm going with Cincinnati.
Kentuckians too…
My 80 year old Mom thinks the only ocean in the world is at Myrtle Beach. For the last 20 years she has traveled to the same hotel, ate in the same restaurants and visited the same souvenir shops because she’s worried she “won’t like the ocean anywhere else”.
^
This is what actually makes a conference strong. Shared culture. No matter where you find it, it's actually how people can relate to each other and it's how true rivalries are born. Everything else is just done for money.
I agree that TCU would be a better add than Cincinnati, heck add Baylor too if you had to add two schools (more population means more TVs, more recruits, more money).
Unfortunately conferences that make sense no longer make enough money, and what I would like to see probably will never happen.
Cincy's Metro population is 2.3 million. Also, fyi, virtually every player on UC's team had Big Ten offers, so we are recruiting as well or better than Purdue, Michigan State, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota but not obviously at the level of Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State and Wisconsin. Take a look at the recruiting rankings for the Class of 2022. Cincy in the top 30-40 as a G5 member, ahead of a ton of so-called Power 5 schools, including ACC schools. UC is the top G5 school in recruiting, and most of the recruits are from Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Indiana, so we are doing just fine in Big Ten country.
How you recruit in Ohio is irrelevant to other ACC schools. What's there for the rest of us to recruit is what matters. There is nothing special there past the 20th kid.
24/7 Top 1000 recruits this year
138 State of Texas
133 State of Florida
90 State of Ga
44 State of La
40 State of Alabama
34 State of TN
30 State of Ohio
29 State of Va
24 State of Pa, and State of NC (worst year for NC in the last 7-8)
14 State of SC
11 State of Ky
Now, how many kids of this 1000 do you need to get every year to put a team on the field? Let's look at 5 classes with red shirts in order to make for 20 of 24 starters and specialists (will allow 4 walk ons and gems that polished up at seniors). Oh and a 50% attrition rate by year 4-5. You are going to need to average at least 10 kids a year that pan out so you need to be getting 15 of these kids a year for top 20-25 program. .
The State of Kentucky and the State of SC can not sustain a single top 25 program. Pa, Va, NC, and Ohio can each sustain 1 program and half of another. TN, Alabama, and Louisiana can sustain 2 top 20-25 programs. Georgia has enough kids to sustain 4-5 programs. Florida and Texas can sustain 8 each.
Put another way these States can support 30 programs, but only 15-18 will get a full haul every year.
The point is as long as Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State, Notre Dame, and Ohio State field a football team, there are not enough players in Indiana, Ohio, Pa, Illinois, and Michigan to stock those teams with competitive talent. The addition of Ohio to the ACC recruiting footprint really does nothing for us.
The truth is coaching connections are what is important to recruiting. During the Tuberville years UC had Robert Prunty on staff and we recruited a ton of Virginia kids - despite the fact we did not have a team in Virginia in the AAC. After he left we haven’t gotten one since. We have an assistant on the team now from Philly, and he is grabbing Western PA, MD and NJ recruits (although I guess you could argue Temple and Navy is in the league).
When Tom O’Brien and Dana Bible (a UC grad) were at NC State and BC they had a pipeline to Cincinnati.
|
|