Quote:On Friday, Jana Winter, a Yahoo News contributor, started pushing a narrative that fits right into the leftist Woke Supremacy’s worldview bubble that “the U.S. government is acknowledging for the first time that right-wing extremists were responsible for the majority of fatal domestic terrorist attacks last year, according to an internal report circulated by the Department of Homeland Security last week.” If you spend any amount of time reading the piece you come to the conclusion that is filled with a lot of assumptions and not many facts.

The report was created by the Joint Regional Intelligence Center, described in her piece as “a DHS-funded fusion center,” and was sent out to police across the country. It declares that violence and civil unrest last year were mostly related to “non-affiliated, right-wing and left-wing actors,” but that “right-wing [domestic violent extremists] were responsible for the majority of fatal attacks in the Homeland in 2020.”

Did it pop right out to you the minute you read it? The statement declares “right-wing and left-wing actors,” but the leftist Woke Winter and the so-called “experts” she quotes in her piece focus only on “right-wing extremism.” Maybe that’s because the report itself is as politcally biased as Jasna Winter and experts in that it was written to give off the insinuation that “right-wing extremism” IS A MAJOR EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO OUR WAY OF LIFE, oh, and by the way, there’s some violence found somewhere on the left as well. How pathetic.

Winter says the report ” appears to be the first known instance of an official government or law enforcement agency clearly acknowledging the trend, though senior officials have noted the rise in white supremacist attacks.” Well, that’s not exactly true either as FBI director Chris Wray said back in 2017 that “white nationalist” violence was equivalently dangerous to the United States as the Islamic State, so there’s that.

Seth Jones of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said about the report, “What is a little unusual is that they’ve used terms like ‘right- and left-wing’ in a government document, because the government has generally used other terms. The government in 2020 did try to stay away from ‘right-wing’ terms because they were easily politicized.” So, the Thief-in-Chief Joe Biden originally told us that there is no red America or blue America, that we are all Americans now has his administration defining people by political ideologies.

And Winter was only so happy to try to pin “right-wing” violence on, you guessed it, Donald Trump.

“The report also comes not long after the end of the Trump administration, which was criticized for downplaying right-wing violence. Former President Donald Trump, in particular, frequently referred to the threat from antifa, a loose movement of left-wing activists.” So we have a leftist reporter pushing nonsense about Donald Trump being a white nationalist or at least sympathetic to them, while ANTIFA is not a real group, it’s just an idea, an idea that has caused billions in damager along with Black Lives Matter during the entire summer of love riot-fest. I swear these leftists are living in a fantasy world.

Making it very clear what the point of this report is, Mike German, whom Yahoo News identifies as a “former FBI agent and now a fellow at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice,” explains: “There is a lot of overlap between white supremacists and far-right militias, and they often work together during the commission of violent acts, like at the attack on the Capitol.”

Can we be honest here? The country witnessed BLM and ANTIFA attacking people for the last three to four years or longer, on television, and with impunity, because Democrats in charge of cities do little to nothing to stop them, and yet I haven’t seen any white nationalists out in the streets attacking anyone because of their radiology or because they wanted to hold a prayer meeting or something. How the hell do they dress so that we can identify them? We know that BLM and ANTIFA thugs dress in black-like uniforms, but what the hell did these white nationalists wear when they go out to thump on people? Outside of the tiki torch brigade that time in Charlottesville where the hell are all the white nationalists that the leftist kooks keep telling us are crawling around every street corner?

And after reporting on this as if the story they gave is real to make you believe that if you support Trump you’re a right-wing terrorist, Yahoo News then pointed out that “the government has released no data on historical activity or the current threat landscape.” So, what then, we’re just supposed to believe them when they make up fantasies about right-wingers attacking innocent people?

The story was so poorly written it’s difficult to understand how they are using terms like “right-wing,” “terrorist attacks” and “violence.” We know that the left has a terrible economy with vocabulary and an English dictionary so it would be good if they would just for once give some explanations of what they mean by the terms they use. A right-wing extremist for example could be someone who voted for Trump as far as they’re concerned.

Link

Its all about money:

Quote:While corporate donors fund Democratic members of Congress who have signaled their approval for violence so long as it is heralded by leftist groups Antifa and Black Lives Matter, they hypocritically threaten to yank funding from the 147 Republicans who voted not to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election.

As cities burned across the country this past year, many top Democrats did not condemn the rioting and looting, or merely brushed it off as “mostly peaceful.” This narrative was likewise promoted on CNN and MSNBC, as reporters stood among fiery streets and lied to our faces about the violence in the name of social justice.





Virtue-signaling is the foremost appetite of corporate America right now, as the rich and powerful attempt to save face by promoting the notion that their values do not align with Republican voters’ at all costs. The precedent being set, though, is a confusing one based on arbitrary distinctions conservatives would be keen to review the next time leftists embrace violence.

If these sanctimonious corporations truly believe in law and order, why did they not rescind the funding of Democrats who openly supported violence this summer and thereafter? Those names include some of the top ones in the party, including Vice President Kamala Harris, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Kamala Harris
At the height of the leftist rioting and looting in June, Harris said in an interview on “The Late Show” with Stephen Colbert that the violence would not stop. She made no effort to encourage those among her party to cease their tirade and rejoin civil society, sending a clear message of support and backing for the political violence.

“They’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop. “This is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop,” Harris repeated. “And everyone beware because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop before Election Day and they’re not going to stop after Election Day. And everyone should take note of that. They’re not gonna let up and they should not.”





Also in June, Harris tweeted a link encouraging her followers to donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, an initiative to bail out protesters who attacked police, bystanders, and private property.

“If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota,” she said.

As reported by The Daily Caller, the fund promoted by Harris notably bailed out six men who were accused of domestic violence after June. The fund also bailed out a twice-convicted sex offender who was accused of sexual relations with a minor.

In September, the Minnesota Freedom Fund released financial information indicating that only 6 percent of donations to it after the death of George Floyd were allocated toward actually bailing out protestors. The vast majority went toward legal assistance for those accused of violent crimes leftists find sympathetic, like Reece Omaur Bonneville, who reportedly left officers with a black eye and cuts and bruises after they apprehended him following reports that he abused his girlfriend.

Throughout Harris’s career, Google parent company Alphabet has given $10,000 to Harris directly as a company and $252,126 when including employee campaign donations. Harris received $1,000 from AT&T and $152,933 from affiliated individuals.

Alphabet has suspended all campaign donations after the Capitol breach, as has AT&T. But why did they not take this action when it was the Democrats egging on violence—whereas not one Republican member of Congress supported the Jan. 6 mayhem?

Jerry Nadler
In July, Rep. Nadler, D-N.Y., was confronted in Washington D.C. by a reporter who asked if he was willing to condemn the BLM and Antifa violence in Portland, Oregon that had at that point gone on for about 60 nights straight.

“That’s a myth,” he said plainly, neglecting what America could see with one eye shut. Eventually, it would be reported that the leftist anarchist uprising was estimated to cost Portland at least $23 million in damages.

Nadler’s comments caught on video in July came after a speech he gave in June on the House floor arguing that Antifa is an “imaginary” organization.

Yet when it wasn’t leftist violence that had occurred, Nadler promptly pressed the Department of Justice to prosecute all the rioters involved in the Capitol breach. The representative is insanely hypocritical for not applying this standard to all who commit violence in plain sight. The left did so for months, and police were routinely ordered to stand down and the rioters excused and overlooked by Democrat elected officials.

In the 2020 election cycle, Nadler received $12,000 from Walt Disney Co and $18,653 total from the company and its employees. He received $10,000 each from AT&T, Alphabet, Comcast, and Microsoft. These corporations have now either threatened or already rescinded GOP donations over the violence Republicans roundly condemned during the Capitol riot.

Where is their dignity in applying this precedent to lawmakers like Nadler who openly cheer on or deny leftist violence?

Chuck Schumer
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in January during a weekly address that Senate Democrats plan to “conduct a rigorous investigation of the events” that culminated in the Capitol breach, “including the role of white supremacy, disinformation, and the gross disparity in force between the Trump administration’s response to the Capitol rioters and the administration’s response to the racial justice protesters last summer.”

There is one glaring issue with Schumer’s statement here. Is he legitimately calling leftist rioters and looters that inflicted the most expensive riot damage in U.S. history—an estimated $2 billion—merely “racial justice protestors”? It sure appears so.

After reconvening in the Senate that same day, Schumer made a reference comparing the Capitol breach amid which five people died to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which killed 2,403 Americans, but repeatedly referred to the murder and mayhem all summer long as “mostly peaceful.” That is also true of the Jan. 6 Trump rally, but point that out and you are endorsing “domestic terrorists” while getting roundly condemned by applying an equal standard to the leftist 2020 riots all across the nation.

During the 2020 cycle, Deloitte LLP gave $10,000 to Schumer through a LeadPAC in his name. During the years 2012 to 2020, they gave him and his PAC $59,000 combined. This is the same company that said in a statement after the Capitol breach that it “will not support those who work to undermine the rule of law,” essentially saying that Republicans who operated through a legal process were undermining the government.

JPMorgan Chase and Co. has given the most out of any PAC to Schumer throughout his career, at $65,000, not including the $309,312 that went to Schumer from its employees. Goldman Sachs comes in at second, with $53,000 donated and $609,015 in total including employees. Both corporations have suspended GOP donations over the breach.

JPMorgan Chase and Co. spokeswoman Patricia A. Wexler declined to comment and Goldman Sachs did not immediately respond to a media request by The Federalist.

If these corporations take this action in retaliation for a small mob of Trump supporters who committed violence for one day, why do they fail to use the same standard for top Democratic politicians who openly supported the months-long Antifa and BLM attacks that resulted in a significantly higher death count?

We know the answer to this question; to all of the questions above. Companies are willing to turn a blind eye to Democratic malfeasance for which they punish Republicans. A political double-standard controls corporate America.

Link

They say whatever they want and we roll over and take it. The Right needs to stop complaining. We're getting what we allow.

The left's most dangerous tactics are the weaponization of language and re-defining of words to suit their agenda.

Remember the good old days when all these things were a CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRy? Shiit is getting real, really fast, and most people don't want to acknowledge it because it's just too much for them.