Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2021 NET Rankings - Updated 1/21
Author Message
Stickboy46 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,657
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 233
I Root For: Wichita State
Location:
Post: #1
MyBB 2021 NET Rankings - Updated 1/21
NET Rankings are out: - 1/21 update

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball...t-rankings

1-15 / 1-21
6 / 5 Houston
58 / 56 SMU
50 / 59 WSU
82 / 75 UCF
68 / 79 Tulsa
134 / 110 Temple
107 / 112 Memphis
105 / 118 Cincy
119 / 122 South Florida
128 / 129 ECU
170 / 189 Tulane
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2021 09:22 AM by Stickboy46.)
01-04-2021 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mustangxc Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 790
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 27
I Root For: SMU
Location:
Post: #2
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?
01-04-2021 09:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bear Catlett Online
All American
*

Posts: 2,563
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 200
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #3
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
We're not a NET drag. it just so happens that we haven't won any of our games yet.
01-04-2021 09:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stxrunner Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,727
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 154
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: Chicago, IL
Post: #4
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Not really surprising. I was wondering why people were getting excited over beating us, even on the road, we aren't even a Q2 game.

This year is basically a throwaway for us.
01-04-2021 10:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Joprior23 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,597
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 27
I Root For: UH
Location:
Post: #5
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

I predicted Temple would be dead last in the conference. I haven’t see anything that makes me second guess that pick. Unless Cincy keeps stinking the gym up. They look terrible.
01-04-2021 10:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mustangxc Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 790
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 27
I Root For: SMU
Location:
Post: #6
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 10:12 AM)Joprior23 Wrote:  
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

I predicted Temple would be dead last in the conference. I haven’t see anything that makes me second guess that pick. Unless Cincy keeps stinking the gym up. They look terrible.

Oh we all knew Temple was in for a rebuilding year. My comment was more in reference to the conference perception and when the league was formed.
01-04-2021 10:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Agust Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,129
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 46
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #7
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
meanwhile at UCLA a team that was 17-16 is now...

7-2 with a NET of 54.


i do miss regular season Cronin.
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2021 10:45 AM by Agust.)
01-04-2021 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Atlanta Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,815
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 473
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: Metro Atlanta
Post: #8
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Frankly surprised Memphis made the top 100. Sadly we're a 1-2 bid league.
01-04-2021 11:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chappy Offline
Resident Goonie
*

Posts: 17,820
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 728
I Root For: ECU
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post: #9
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Wait, I thought the only reason we haven’t been getting more bids was because ECU and Tulane were in the 300’s? [/sarcasm]
01-04-2021 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Foreverandever Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,587
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 236
I Root For: &
Location:
Post: #10
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Lot of gloom and doom here lol.

Temple and Tulsa will probably squeeze in one or two more OOC and every team should end up 150 or better, eight or nine in the top 120, and with seven maybe eight finishing in the top 100.

It's a three bid league minimum and probably four. Five might of be out of reach depends on other conferences and any of the missed ooc games getting made up and being decent.

I would say this pretty accurate rank of the conference right now.
01-04-2021 11:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vick mike Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,860
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 281
I Root For: Temple U
Location:
Post: #11
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
I would have guessed we were lower. Top 150 is within reach! (if we ever play another game)
01-04-2021 12:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Stickboy46 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,657
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 233
I Root For: Wichita State
Location:
Post: #12
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Interesting tidbit

Lowest 10 Rated NET teams from Major 7 (P5 + AAC + BE)

160 Tulane (AAC)
169 Notre Dame (ACC)
170 Butler (BE)
177 Vanderbilt (SEC)
186 Nebraska (Big 10)
193 California (Pac 12)
198 Oregon St (Pac 12)
203 K-State (Big 12)
209 Iowa St (Big 12)
237 Washington (Pac 12)

Every major conference has at least one team lower than our worst team (Tulane). Pac 12 has 3.
01-04-2021 12:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Foreverandever Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,587
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 236
I Root For: &
Location:
Post: #13
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 12:07 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  Interesting tidbit

Lowest 10 Rated NET teams from Major 7 (P5 + AAC + BE)

160 Tulane (AAC)
169 Notre Dame (ACC)
170 Butler (BE)
177 Vanderbilt (SEC)
186 Nebraska (Big 10)
193 California (Pac 12)
198 Oregon St (Pac 12)
203 K-State (Big 12)
209 Iowa St (Big 12)
237 Washington (Pac 12)

Every major conference has at least one team lower than our worst team (Tulane). Pac 12 has 3.

This is what excites me, it means next season in what will hopefully be a full season ooc and in conference, with both Tulane and Temple expected improve, ECU at peak Gardner, UCF more experienced should be a crazy fun year. This is an in between step, our top isn't quite as good as some previous years, but our bottom is much stronger.

This year looks pretty ho hum although it could still turn out quite well, next year could be massive.
01-04-2021 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoOwls111 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,463
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Owls
Location: NYC
Post: #14
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

I did, that is what a bad coaching hire will do in any sport.
01-04-2021 12:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Stickboy46 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,657
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 233
I Root For: Wichita State
Location:
Post: #15
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 11:58 AM)Foreverandever Wrote:  Lot of gloom and doom here lol.

Temple and Tulsa will probably squeeze in one or two more OOC and every team should end up 150 or better, eight or nine in the top 120, and with seven maybe eight finishing in the top 100.

It's a three bid league minimum and probably four. Five might of be out of reach depends on other conferences and any of the missed ooc games getting made up and being decent.

I would say this pretty accurate rank of the conference right now.

Still early but if you had to rank resumes right now vs just raw NET, we have several pretty decent ones

Houston: Q1: 4-1, Q2: 0-0, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 2-0, Road 2-1
Wichita: Q1: 2-1, Q2: 1-1, Q3: 1-0, Q4: 0-0, Road 3-0

SMU: Q1: 0-1, Q2: 1-0, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 3-0, Road 2-0
Tulsa: Q1: 1-0, Q2: 1-2, Q3: 1-1, Q4: 2-0, Road 2-0

UCF: Q1: 1-2, Q2: 0-1, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 0-0, Road 1-2


So I'd say Houston and Wichita have Good resumes ... SMU/Tulsa have ok resumes ... UCF has a resume with work to do but has that Q1 road win which will help
01-04-2021 12:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Foreverandever Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,587
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 236
I Root For: &
Location:
Post: #16
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 12:20 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  
(01-04-2021 11:58 AM)Foreverandever Wrote:  Lot of gloom and doom here lol.

Temple and Tulsa will probably squeeze in one or two more OOC and every team should end up 150 or better, eight or nine in the top 120, and with seven maybe eight finishing in the top 100.

It's a three bid league minimum and probably four. Five might of be out of reach depends on other conferences and any of the missed ooc games getting made up and being decent.

I would say this pretty accurate rank of the conference right now.

Still early but if you had to rank resumes right now vs just raw NET, we have several pretty decent ones

Houston: Q1: 4-1, Q2: 0-0, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 2-0, Road 2-1
Wichita: Q1: 2-1, Q2: 1-1, Q3: 1-0, Q4: 0-0, Road 3-0

SMU: Q1: 0-1, Q2: 1-0, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 3-0, Road 2-0
Tulsa: Q1: 1-0, Q2: 1-2, Q3: 1-1, Q4: 2-0, Road 2-0

UCF: Q1: 1-2, Q2: 0-1, Q3: 2-0, Q4: 0-0, Road 1-2


So I'd say Houston and Wichita have Good resumes ... SMU/Tulsa have ok resumes ... UCF has a resume with work to do but has that Q1 road win which will help

That's how I see it. Right now Houston and then either SMU/Wichita is in. Then it's a matter of numbers, unless it all goes horribly wrong, one of the other three is likely to get another bid. We need some things to go right to get a fourth and the right kind of crazy to get five. Pretty hard not to see three bids there.
01-04-2021 12:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Joprior23 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,597
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 27
I Root For: UH
Location:
Post: #17
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
Would be nice if Memphis was even close to being as good as the hype they receive each offseason.
01-04-2021 01:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JHG722 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,035
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 191
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Post: #18
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

When Colgate has played two games and is in the top 20, it's a worthless metric at the moment. We are much better than last year.
01-04-2021 01:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JHG722 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,035
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 191
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Post: #19
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 10:12 AM)Joprior23 Wrote:  
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

I predicted Temple would be dead last in the conference. I haven’t see anything that makes me second guess that pick. Unless Cincy keeps stinking the gym up. They look terrible.

We've played 3 games with 6 new players, soon to be 7 if/when Battle is healthy. We look better than last year, but I'm not sure how you can come to that conclusion so soon.
01-04-2021 01:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vick mike Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,860
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 281
I Root For: Temple U
Location:
Post: #20
RE: 2021 NET Rankings
(01-04-2021 12:13 PM)GoOwls111 Wrote:  
(01-04-2021 09:47 AM)mustangxc Wrote:  Who knew Cincinnati and Temple would be a drag on NET for the conference?

I did, that is what a bad coaching hire will do in any sport.

I think it is way early to say McKie was a bad hire. Year 1 started great, playing over their heads a bit, but collapsed due in part to injuries, team dissension and change of culture. McKie will get at least 2 more years to prove himself. If by then things aren’t changing, or are changing too slowly, then I might agree. But Temple basketball is in rebuild/re-culture mode, and additionally, doing so in a pandemic.
01-04-2021 01:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2021 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2021 MyBB Group.