(08-17-2020 09:33 PM)bullet Wrote:  Anybody who didn't expect Trump to be shoot from the hip and somewhat all over the place is incompetent themselves. They didn't do their homework. All they had to do was watch one or two episodes of The Apprentice.

Bureaucrats don't know how not to bureaucrat. And, without looking, ten bucks this guy is some kind of Ivy lawyer or close. There's a book solution for everything.

Gut or instinct need not apply.

Oh, and this guy is exactly why Trump won.

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

(08-18-2020 12:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 12:05 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Is it brave to bash Trump in the media? The things that he alleges in the video are inconsequential in nature. Where is the proof? It's all talk, he said he said.

Not being interested in national security is inconsequential?

And this is not the first person who's made these claims. At some point, you have to see the fire beyond the smoke...at least if you're being honest.

Biggest military build-up in 30+ yrs. Albahgdadi- dead. Soliemani- Bits-n-pieces. Maximum pressure on the moolahs. Isis-dead. Troops OUT (for the most part) of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan. Re-shuffling deployments to keep the Dims favorite accomplice Pootey-poot in check.

What else has he not been interested in? The local PO box crisis?

(08-18-2020 03:30 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

Because as I indicated, he's not the only guy! Off the top of my head you have Tillerson, Cohen, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly, Bolton...and on and on. All pretty much say the same thing.

(08-19-2020 06:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 03:30 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

Because as I indicated, he's not the only guy! Off the top of my head you have Tillerson, Cohen, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly, Bolton...and on and on. All pretty much say the same thing.

The other similarities? All fired. Gone. Replaced.

(08-17-2020 06:34 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  It’s so funny how liberals/leftists/democrats completely miss the point of why Trump was elected in the first place. It wasn’t because of his “beautiful,” stuttering intellect. Everyone knows he isn’t a policy wonk, detail oriented leader. He’s instinctive, understands how people think and generally is right on a lot of issues.

^^^

macro is a lost upon the dipshites...

(08-18-2020 03:17 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 02:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 01:39 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 01:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 12:59 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  ...this stuff still doesn't work. You will not separate Trump from his base by calling him stupid or saying he's bad at his job.

When will you get this?

Who cares? And of course, his base is a cult, they will drink hemlock if trump says so. What this may do however is swing the 1% or less of undecideds that will likely swing a close election.

And per this guy, there's more of it coming from other sources. Stay tuned...

We'll buckle up for it, for sure.

What is the point of reporting it if it isn't to pry some of his base away? Unless it is just a TDS circle-jerk, which I totally get... I mean, what else do you have to do? (Unless you're burning down your own city and beating people that you just forced to wreck their cars.)

Let's face it... the people who are going to begrudgingly vote for the candidate with dementia in 2020 already have formulated their opinions of Trump.

Trump voters just see this crap as even more motivation to turn out in droves to save this country from becoming a giant Portland, Seattle, or San Francisco. We don't want it. It will be a huge bonus to rub it in your faces for another 4 years, though.

The point is country over team and party. Something you cult members care nothing about.

We see what the democrats are all about and will vote against it because we feel it's what's best for the country. That does not make us cult members. Sometimes you have to go with the lesser of two evils. Given what we've seen from the democrats it's a no brainer.

they went full monty with too many cli(n)to(n)ris'. ...

those dipshites deserve sig line 4 to the power of x10...

(08-19-2020 07:10 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 06:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 03:30 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

Because as I indicated, he's not the only guy! Off the top of my head you have Tillerson, Cohen, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly, Bolton...and on and on. All pretty much say the same thing.

The other similarities? All fired. Gone. Replaced.

Kelly and Mattis resigned. And did this guy get fired or just leave? I've seen nothing to indicate he was fired.

Is he writing a book?

Seems if you want to make some quick loot, you write a book about Orange Man Bad. The libs will eat that up.

(08-19-2020 08:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 07:10 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 06:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 03:30 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

Because as I indicated, he's not the only guy! Off the top of my head you have Tillerson, Cohen, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly, Bolton...and on and on. All pretty much say the same thing.

The other similarities? All fired. Gone. Replaced.

Kelly and Mattis resigned. And did this guy get fired or just leave? I've seen nothing to indicate he was fired.

In the work place, people are frequently given the choice to either resign or be fired. It could be that they resigned because they knew they would be fired if they didn't, and resigning looks better for them than being fired.

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

(08-19-2020 09:34 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 08:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 07:10 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 06:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 03:30 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Why do you just reflexively believe this guy? simply because you like what he's said?

Sounds to me like another careerist that's reading the months old polls and hoping to angle for some position in a Sloe "administration".

Next.

Because as I indicated, he's not the only guy! Off the top of my head you have Tillerson, Cohen, Mattis, Scaramucci, Kelly, Bolton...and on and on. All pretty much say the same thing.

The other similarities? All fired. Gone. Replaced.

Kelly and Mattis resigned. And did this guy get fired or just leave? I've seen nothing to indicate he was fired.

In the work place, people are frequently given the choice to either resign or be fired. It could be that they resigned because they knew they would be fired if they didn't, and resigning looks better for them than being fired.

Of course, but let's try to be factual, k?

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

(08-19-2020 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

I knew I could get you to respond by saying that.

So the POTUS uses Twitter to rile up the masses. That is not anything close to being identical to have a federal bureau spy on a Presidential candidate.

(08-19-2020 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 09:05 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You don't get it, do you guys? We don't want politics like usual. Politics like usual is what we hate because it got us to this point. The Great Orange Bastard is busting up the political establishment and that's what we want. That's why we voted him in and will vote him in again. He is the epitome of NOT a career politician!

Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

Let me know when Trump weaponizes the IRS and/or the DOJ against his political rivals.

Lots of people say nasty things about former bosses. Saying them doesn't make them true.

(08-19-2020 10:07 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

Let me know when Trump weaponizes the IRS and/or the DOJ against his political rivals.

I assume you have proof Obama had the IRS do something? Yeah...didn't think so. And did you type that DOJ nonsense with a straight face? C'mon man...nobody is that naive.

(08-19-2020 10:05 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-18-2020 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did you even listen to the piece? He says trump was not interested in national security matters and was using the government to attack rivals.

That's hardly just not following the normal political establishment!

What you guys are dismissing in order to keep power is maddening.

Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

I knew I could get you to respond by saying that.

So the POTUS uses Twitter to rile up the masses. That is not anything close to being identical to have a federal bureau spy on a Presidential candidate.

Spying? You're funny.

(08-19-2020 10:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 10:07 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:49 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 09:43 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  Sounds like Trump is just following the precedent that was set by the previous administration.

Rtom will just ignore that response.

Dude, just stop, I don't ignore anything.

Never said Obama didn't go after political rivals, but if you're going to try and assert that he did it at the same level or more than trump, you're insane.

And this just hit the airwaves....he just keeps going with the nonsense.

Let me know when Trump weaponizes the IRS and/or the DOJ against his political rivals.

I assume you have proof Obama had the IRS do something? Yeah...didn't think so. And did you type that DOJ nonsense with a straight face? C'mon man...nobody is that naive.

Joe Biden used this same phrase when he was sexually assaulting Tara Reid. You remember her, right. SHes the woman who ran one of his campaigns until he got horney and sexually assaulted her, and when she said no, he then had her fired.