(02-03-2020 10:37 AM)Nameless Wrote:  Dude you twist yourself into such a pretzel trying to convince yourself everyone else is a moron.

"Defended his actions" is not strange wording. Debating the severity of something, claiming he "didn't use that much force, he was trying to get the guy's knee out of his face" and all of the other nonsensical bs you've said in this thread is the definition of defending his actions. Saying what he did isn't that severe, when everyone else in this thread agrees it is, is defending his actions genius.

Oh, those quotes were paraphrases btw, before you accuse me of putting words in your mouth as you've done to others on here.

You are the epitome of a narcissist

you are the epitome of jumping into a conversation that had nothing to do with you and trying to input your meaning into it

you twisted my point into saying he did nothing wrong.. (something i never did).and sampson says he did something wrong, and you run to say: im wrong...when you werent even in the conversation....
i never debated he did the right thing, so a statement saying he did the wrong thing ..have little meaning to this debate.
we were talking severity and length of punishment ..and yes you can have points to discuss why something is that severe without saying its the right thing, contrary to your belief

you did in fact twist my words ..that is a fact..

you are the narcissist here (self importance),.. you came into a conversation hours after it was over to define what others said, as you are obviously the final judge and because your input was needed

(02-03-2020 10:50 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 10:37 AM)Nameless Wrote:  Dude you twist yourself into such a pretzel trying to convince yourself everyone else is a moron.

"Defended his actions" is not strange wording. Debating the severity of something, claiming he "didn't use that much force, he was trying to get the guy's knee out of his face" and all of the other nonsensical bs you've said in this thread is the definition of defending his actions. Saying what he did isn't that severe, when everyone else in this thread agrees it is, is defending his actions genius.

Oh, those quotes were paraphrases btw, before you accuse me of putting words in your mouth as you've done to others on here.

You are the epitome of a narcissist

you are the epitome of jumping into a conversation that had nothing to do with you and trying to input your meaning into it

you twisted my point into saying he did nothing wrong.. (something i never did).and sampson says he did something wrong, and you run to say: im wrong...when you werent even in the conversation....
i never debated he did the right thing, so a statement saying he did the wrong thing ..have little meaning to this debate.
we were talking severity and length of punishment ..and yes you can have points to discuss why something is that severe without saying its the right thing, contrary to your belief

you did in fact twist my words ..that is a fact..

you are the narcissist here (self importance),.. you came into a conversation hours after it was over to define what others said, as you are obviously the final judge and because your input was needed

I never said you claimed he did nothing wrong, dumb ass. I said you defended his actions, then explained what that means, even though it should require no explanation.

And FYI, I didn't "input my meaning" (and you accuse me of using strange words?) into anything. I responded to posts on a message board... Involving teams from a conference my favorite team plays in. My comments were me laughing at how ridiculous you are, I didn't even comment on the situation until you asked me how Sampson's comments changed anything.

You make no effort to understand the points anyone makes in this thread. Just find a way to twist what they say, (hilarious, considering that is precisely what you accuse everyone else of doing throughout this thread) then act like everyone else is an idiot and it's just a mob mentality against you.

I'm not going to waste any more time arguing with you, enough people have already. But honestly man, if you legitimately believe there is some mob mentality against you here, print out a transcript of this conversation, show it to a medical professional, and see what they say. I guarantee you not one agrees with you. I'm not saying that to be an ***hole or funny, I mean it.

Have a good one.

(02-03-2020 09:17 AM)pesik Wrote:  My fault is probably responding too much

But legit half this thread is just accusing me of saying things I never said and this trying to claim victories of the things I never said

From the start I acknowledged a bite ( put his teeth on him). But people started attacking Dejon and suggesting extreme punishment.. I said it wasn’t that severe, punishment likely not that big... (This was the debate)

60 posters at different times: every time someone showed some proof of a bite, would run to say I was wrong, like I was debating it didn’t happen And didn’t put his teeth on him .. or makeup a crazy scenario like I said it was diarra fault

The mob mentality is weird..

Put his teeth on him? This is how you're trying to justify this dumpster fire?

(02-03-2020 11:30 AM)MickMack Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 09:17 AM)pesik Wrote:  My fault is probably responding too much

But legit half this thread is just accusing me of saying things I never said and this trying to claim victories of the things I never said

From the start I acknowledged a bite ( put his teeth on him). But people started attacking Dejon and suggesting extreme punishment.. I said it wasn’t that severe, punishment likely not that big... (This was the debate)

60 posters at different times: every time someone showed some proof of a bite, would run to say I was wrong, like I was debating it didn’t happen And didn’t put his teeth on him .. or makeup a crazy scenario like I said it was diarra fault

The mob mentality is weird..

Put his teeth on him? This is how you're trying to justify this dumpster fire?

How long can this thread go on like this? Pesik is on another level right now.

"Put his teeth on him"

(02-03-2020 11:35 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 11:30 AM)MickMack Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 09:17 AM)pesik Wrote:  My fault is probably responding too much

But legit half this thread is just accusing me of saying things I never said and this trying to claim victories of the things I never said

From the start I acknowledged a bite ( put his teeth on him). But people started attacking Dejon and suggesting extreme punishment.. I said it wasn’t that severe, punishment likely not that big... (This was the debate)

60 posters at different times: every time someone showed some proof of a bite, would run to say I was wrong, like I was debating it didn’t happen And didn’t put his teeth on him .. or makeup a crazy scenario like I said it was diarra fault

The mob mentality is weird..

Put his teeth on him? This is how you're trying to justify this dumpster fire?

How long can this thread go on like this? Pesik is on another level right now.

As long as people keep engaging Coach P, forever would be the answer to your question.

(02-03-2020 12:14 PM)geef Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 11:35 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 11:30 AM)MickMack Wrote:  

(02-03-2020 09:17 AM)pesik Wrote:  My fault is probably responding too much

But legit half this thread is just accusing me of saying things I never said and this trying to claim victories of the things I never said

From the start I acknowledged a bite ( put his teeth on him). But people started attacking Dejon and suggesting extreme punishment.. I said it wasn’t that severe, punishment likely not that big... (This was the debate)

60 posters at different times: every time someone showed some proof of a bite, would run to say I was wrong, like I was debating it didn’t happen And didn’t put his teeth on him .. or makeup a crazy scenario like I said it was diarra fault

The mob mentality is weird..

Put his teeth on him? This is how you're trying to justify this dumpster fire?

How long can this thread go on like this? Pesik is on another level right now.

As long as people keep engaging Coach P, forever would be the answer to your question.

Truth. I found this out the hard way lol.

(02-03-2020 10:38 AM)justinhub2003 Wrote:  Someone on the Bearcat Talk posted this:

Houston shot 29 midrange shots. UC shot 8.


If Houston was truly trying to learn from this game, it would be that, they didn't Get to the free throw line as many times as UC because they decided to take 29 mid range jumpers. UC either shot a 3, or took it to the paint to demand contact


29 mid range jumpers is far too many

So true, as few players shoot mid-range jumpers at a decent rate.