GoldenWarrior11
Heisman
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 612
I Root For: Marquette, BE
Location: Chicago
|
RE: California Schools Will Not Be Part Of The NCAA In 2023 If Newsom Signs The Bill
(10-01-2019 02:05 PM)YNot Wrote: (10-01-2019 12:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote: (10-01-2019 11:40 AM)YNot Wrote: (10-01-2019 05:53 AM)otown Wrote: This is very interesting. What happens if an athlete signs with Nike and part of the deal is to wear Nikes, but he is at an Adidas school. Can the athlete sue the university if they prohibit him from wearing Nike's during the game, thus preventing him from fulfilling his endorsement deal?
A similar situation happened at UCF with marcus jordan wanting to wear Jordan's for bball. It resulted in the school actually signing a new contract with Nike.
(10-01-2019 08:13 AM)TripleA Wrote: (09-30-2019 08:27 PM)chester Wrote: Right on! And West Virginia will be in the mix:
ETA: So far, that's
Colorado
Florida
Illinois
New York
South Carolina
Tennessee
Washington
West Virginia
Any missed?
If all those states pass legislation, the battle is already over for the NCAA.
Add Pennsylvania and North Carolina to the list.
So, there are at least 24 Power 5 schools that would be directly affected by new state laws? Including 7 from the PAC 12, 9 from the ACC, 4 from the SEC, and 3 from the Big Ten:
USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Colorado, Florida, Florida State, Miami, Illinois, Northwestern, Syracuse, North Carolina, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest, Clemson, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Washington, Washington State, WVU, Penn State, and Pitt.
And, another 20 Group of 5 or independent schools that would be directly affected, with 5 from the MWC, 5 from the AAC, 5 from the CUSA, and a couple from the Sun Belt:
Fresno State, SDSU, SJSU, CSU, Air Force, UCF, USF, FIU, FAU, Army, Buffalo, Coastal Carolina, ECU, Appalachian State, Charlotte, Memphis, MTU, Marshall, Temple.
Yeah, it's change or be replaced for the NCAA.
Take out the military schools since they are different and are actually employees of the US Government already.
Can student-athletes at the military schools currently make money off their name, image, and likeness?
If so, I did not know that and I am surprised.
If not, keep them on the list...it will make a difference.
(10-01-2019 12:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote: We could add Maryland to the list as well.
Now, these bills includes all of D1, D2 and D3 and NAIA. Colorado law would have athletes at Colorado Mines to get paid as well. California's law will only show that only a few players out of the 1000s will be able to sell their names and likeness. I think with EA sports deal should go to the NCAA for them to allocate to all NCAA schools from all levels. There are board games on college football that used names and likeness of players that were D1 like University of Chicago, M.I.T., Case, Western Reserve, Carnegie and others.
I have this game since the 1980s.
They stooped making them when EA Sports did as well. The newer ones have newer teams as well like Boise State. Both Montana and Idaho were included in the old ones just like the Ivy League schools.
If my memory serves correctly, EA Sports never really had any FCS schools in its lineup and definitely no names or likeness of FCS players. You had like 4 alternatives for an FCS opponent - FCS West, FCS South, FCS Midwest, FCS East...something like that.
I see no reason why the EA Sports money that is related to the use of players' names and likenesses should go to the NCAA...let alone that the NCAA would allocate that to all NCAA schools from all levels. That money should go to the players whose actual names and likenesses are used in the video game.
NCAA 08 definitely had FCS teams. I would always add Villanova and Georgetown to the Big East haha.
|
|