(06-29-2019 09:57 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:50 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:49 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  Lotta delusional AAC fans around here.

We got better when Rutgers left and will too with UCONN gone

Yeah, sure you did. Whatever gets you through these trying times.

I think Rutgers is the one having 'trying times'.

(06-30-2019 02:34 AM)Fishpro10987 Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:57 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:50 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:49 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  Lotta delusional AAC fans around here. :coffee3:

We got better when Rutgers left and will too with UCONN gone

Yeah, sure you did. Whatever gets you through these trying times. :coffee3:

I think Rutgers is the one having 'trying times'.

Rutgers was never about talent it was about tv markets. That is what they are and always be.

(06-29-2019 09:05 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 07:18 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 07:16 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 12:33 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 12:25 PM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  Respectfully, while these NET rankings are accurate, one year's worth of NET rankings are not used to qualify the value and perception of a conference. If Houston was #4 overall in NET, and failed to advance past the Sweet 16, does that mean they under-performed in the tournament? The obvious answer is no (they lost to a higher seed, Kentucky). NET is a single season-based metric; it does not utilize program history, attendance or fan support in its rankings; thus, it is a poor indicator to judge the value or perception of a program or a conference.

From the same point of view, Buffalo should be considered a top basketball program; while they had a strong season last year, one season in an advanced metric does not elevate a program into a top/superior program.

There's no reason to be respectful, as his data is absurd.

The fact is, the Big East has finished ahead of the AAC in RPI all six years since the split, and in NET this past season as well.

The next time the AAC is better than the Big East in hoops will be the first time.

As for beating out P5 schools, the AAC has done that only one time in six years, this year over the PAC, but the PAC was historically awful.

In contrast, the Big East has beaten out at least one P5 conference - and sometimes two or three - every single year since the split.

Nobody knows what will happen in the future, but since the split the Big East has routed the AAC in basketball. Crushed it like a bug.

She mad lol

It is all the only thing you need to know about Quo Troll.

This ^^^

I wreck "SuperFly's" ridiculous data, and three AAC fanboys clamber in to say I'm mad. The AAC bitterness is overwhelming.

(06-30-2019 08:10 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 09:05 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 07:18 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 07:16 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(06-29-2019 12:33 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's no reason to be respectful, as his data is absurd.

The fact is, the Big East has finished ahead of the AAC in RPI all six years since the split, and in NET this past season as well.

The next time the AAC is better than the Big East in hoops will be the first time.

As for beating out P5 schools, the AAC has done that only one time in six years, this year over the PAC, but the PAC was historically awful.

In contrast, the Big East has beaten out at least one P5 conference - and sometimes two or three - every single year since the split.

Nobody knows what will happen in the future, but since the split the Big East has routed the AAC in basketball. Crushed it like a bug.

She mad lol

It is all the only thing you need to know about Quo Troll.

This ^^^

I wreck "SuperFly's" ridiculous data, and three AAC fanboys clamber in to say I'm mad. The AAC bitterness is overwhelming.

You wrecked no data. The Net rankings are what they are. You are a troll who calls for disrespectful postings.

(06-30-2019 07:36 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  Rutgers was never about talent it was about tv markets. That is what they are and always be.

That is just not true. The Big Ten is the P5 conference without a school in one of the big three recruiting states and with the weakest position among the top ten. So for the Big Ten, it was also about recruiting grounds. That's another reason that a school like UConn wouldn't have been in the running ... on the East Coast, New Jersey is about as far north as the decent recruiting grounds go.