Didn’t take long. Schifty set the tone and now the MSM runs with the ball. That is right, one of the oldest plays in the book, accuse the other side of doing exactly what you have done. Pure Clintonian politics. The people that believe this are complete fools but there are plenty of them out there. When the plot is exposed these same people will be fooled by the same people again. And around and around they go.....

(05-24-2019 09:36 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Didn’t take long. Schifty set the tone and now the MSM runs with the ball. That is right, one of the oldest plays in the book, accuse the other side of doing exactly what you have done. Pure Clintonian politics. The people that believe this are complete fools but there are plenty of them out there. When the plot is exposed these same people will be fooled by the same people again. And around and around they go.....

So, sometime soon, we're going to find out which democrat had russian hookers pee on him. (or her)

(05-23-2019 10:18 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I welcome it. Let justice be done or let the heavens fall. I know he’s as guilty as sin. Let it all come out. No worries on this end. He’s a corrupt criminal and we all need to know how this started. Amazing that you think this is going to end up well for The stable genius. .Let the shenanigans come to light. We have a criminal President. I welcome any and all investigations.

Actually, you don't know that at all. You just can't accept the fact that he won and your side lost.

Making statements like this, only proves to everyone else that you are completely unstable and unable to comprehend and reason like a normal human being. Simply put, you are a sheep for the democrats and can't see beyond the talking points that CNN, Jester, et al. give you.

(05-24-2019 09:44 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-24-2019 09:36 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Didn’t take long. Schifty set the tone and now the MSM runs with the ball. That is right, one of the oldest plays in the book, accuse the other side of doing exactly what you have done. Pure Clintonian politics. The people that believe this are complete fools but there are plenty of them out there. When the plot is exposed these same people will be fooled by the same people again. And around and around they go.....

So, sometime soon, we're going to find out which democrat had russian hookers pee on him. (or her)

Yes. And which one didn’t.

BTW, nothing is going happen soon. There will be plenty of time for the libs to hang themselves.

(05-24-2019 09:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

That simply cannot be true. The Media would never want to cover something truthful up.

Trumpbots don't get tired of looking stupid. The fact that you still listen to him and believe him is proof of how stupid you are. lol

(05-24-2019 10:06 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Trumpbots don't get tired of looking stupid. The fact that you still listen to him and believe him is proof of how stupid you are. lol

What shouldn't we believe this time?

Any and all investigations!!!!

No cherry picking the results. Let’s declassify those redactions too!!!!

(05-24-2019 09:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

Yep. It was reversed when the corrupt government crime bosses were running the show. Now that they have resigned or been fired different matter.

(05-24-2019 10:06 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Trumpbots don't get tired of looking stupid. The fact that you still listen to him and believe him is proof of how stupid you are. lol

believe him on what? All he did was declassify information and let yo decide for yourself.

You're the one on here claiming somehow that he KNOWS he did something illegal and is hiding it by declassifying it?? Talk about stupid.

It's entirely possible that he doesn't know he did anything illegal or that he thinks he hid it so well that you won't catch it... especially since the special prosecutor, FBI, IRS et al didn't catch it.

Seems to me that the stupid ones are the ones who think that despite wire taps and cooperating witnesses and the ability to extort people for information based on decades old and unrelated issues and subpoenas and informants and all the investigative tools of the US failing to implicate the President, that somehow a bunch of people who don't do such things professionally will find the truth in PREPARED documents. The old "Payments to Russian Oligarchs for Fixing the Election' deduction or memo line on a check.

(05-24-2019 10:31 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Any and all investigations!!!!

No cherry picking the results. Let’s declassify those redactions too!!!!

You wouldn't believe any results that exonerate Trump so don't even try to fool yourself. Liberal Lemming, is what you have become. LL for short.

(05-24-2019 10:06 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Trumpbots don't get tired of looking stupid. The fact that you still listen to him and believe him is proof of how stupid you are. lol

Said the Leftie-bot.

(05-24-2019 09:57 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

Scary---but true.

(05-24-2019 10:31 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Any and all investigations!!!!
No cherry picking the results. Let’s declassify those redactions too!!!!

You understand that not all of the redactions relate to classified information, right? You understand that a copy of the report with the classified information restrictions restored has been available for congress critters with appropriate security clearances to review for some time, right? Last I heard, 2 republicans and zero democrats had gone to see it.

You understand that the remaining redactions, some 2 lines and 7 partial lines, are redacted because they contain information which, according to federal law, cannot be disclosed, right? You can't "declassify" a federal law. If you want those redactions removed, you have to pass a new law.

You understand these things, right?

(05-24-2019 07:44 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-23-2019 10:04 PM)king king Wrote:  What I read said he ordered the intelligence agencies to work with Barr to review surveillance issues around his campaign.

Are these the same intelligence agencies that he's rebuked over and over again as incompetent? Are we supposed to now believe they aren't?

No, we are supposed to believe that regardless of their level of competency they are who we turn to with matters such as that. It's not too much to expect them to do their jobs is it?

No, that's exactly what we should expect. However, after painting them as incompetent, he now, apparently at least, expects us to take them on their word that they've worked with AG Barr to prove they are incompetent? It's a Chinese finger trap.

(05-24-2019 11:29 AM)king king Wrote:  

(05-24-2019 07:44 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-23-2019 10:04 PM)king king Wrote:  What I read said he ordered the intelligence agencies to work with Barr to review surveillance issues around his campaign.
Are these the same intelligence agencies that he's rebuked over and over again as incompetent? Are we supposed to now believe they aren't?

No, we are supposed to believe that regardless of their level of competency they are who we turn to with matters such as that. It's not too much to expect them to do their jobs is it?

No, that's exactly what we should expect. However, after painting them as incompetent, he now, apparently at least, expects us to take them on their word that they've worked with AG Barr to prove they are incompetent? It's a Chinese finger trap.

I think he will rely largely on AG Barr to tell them how well they worked with him. So no, I don't expect him to take them at their word. I certainly would not.

(05-23-2019 11:54 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  While we are declassifying things. Let’s declassify the redacted parts of the Mueller report and let Mueller testify to Congress!

AMIRITE!!!!

You’ll get no argument from me.

Mueller, on the other hand, seems to have different ideas...

(05-24-2019 11:31 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-24-2019 11:29 AM)king king Wrote:  

(05-24-2019 07:44 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-23-2019 10:04 PM)king king Wrote:  What I read said he ordered the intelligence agencies to work with Barr to review surveillance issues around his campaign.
Are these the same intelligence agencies that he's rebuked over and over again as incompetent? Are we supposed to now believe they aren't?

No, we are supposed to believe that regardless of their level of competency they are who we turn to with matters such as that. It's not too much to expect them to do their jobs is it?

No, that's exactly what we should expect. However, after painting them as incompetent, he now, apparently at least, expects us to take them on their word that they've worked with AG Barr to prove they are incompetent? It's a Chinese finger trap.

I think he will rely largely on AG Barr to tell them how well they worked with him. So no, I don't expect him to take them at their word. I certainly would not.

Which could go a loooong way toward proving a whole lot of nothing. Which is exactly what it would do if I were sitting on top of a massive pile of treasonous cover up. Hence my reticence to believe anything substantial will come of this exercise.

(05-24-2019 11:26 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-24-2019 10:31 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Any and all investigations!!!!
No cherry picking the results. Let’s declassify those redactions too!!!!

You understand that not all of the redactions relate to classified information, right? You understand that a copy of the report with the classified information restrictions restored has been available for congress critters with appropriate security clearances to review for some time, right? Last I heard, 2 republicans and zero democrats had gone to see it.

You understand that the remaining redactions, some 2 lines and 7 partial lines, are redacted because they contain information which, according to federal law, cannot be disclosed, right? You can't "declassify" a federal law. If you want those redactions removed, you have to pass a new law.

You understand these things, right?

Here let me answer... Nope..