Swalwell is the dullest knife in the butter knife drawer.

if it wasn't for elective government, and the fact that his constituents are either total liberal zombies, or the biggest foreheaded retards on the planet, then this guy wold be giving blowjobs under a bridge because he needed the protein.

https://amgreatness.com/2018/11/18/the-p...ynopticon/

They are certainly inundating us with their rhetoric.

"Yet there is a larger obstacle to achieving that long-term 51 percent Trump solution along with the shorter-term strategy of matching Democratic absentee ballots with Republican absentee ballots. Conservatives have lost entirely the culture and establishment wars. The result is that they are besieged by a circle of hostile progressive, but quite establishment institutions that are relentless.


Imagine the traditionalist as living in synopticon—a suspect that is the target of 24/7 viewing, indoctrination, and conditioning by progressive auditors. In other words, a 40-45 percent minority of Americans is relentlessly lectured, sermonized, demonized, and neutered by a 360- degree ring of prying institutional overseers...."

(11-17-2018 02:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 12:48 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 11:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

They joined to support and defend the Constitution, and would defect if some lunatic like swalwell ordered them to nuke their own citizens.

Swalwell isn't a lunatic, but just used some unfortunate words talking to an internet troll who wanted to spread the "Red Dawn" fantasy.

If the Dems take full control, expect some gun control measures. Expect some idiot to try to openly defy it. Expect the state to force compliance. Expect no one who supported the Dems to be mad at the Dems for what happens.

The time is now to work out some gun control compromises. Not later. Think about it.

What fantasy are you talking about?

Quote:If the Dems take full control, expect some gun control measures.

I agree. It's quite nefarious, really.

1. Work to disarm the hated white male demographic.
2. Do nothing about minority on minority gun violence.

Keeps the white male subdued and keeps the minorities killing each other. That, my friends, is a feature and not a bug to the Democrats.

(11-19-2018 11:01 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

Quote:If the Dems take full control, expect some gun control measures.

I agree. It's quite nefarious, really.

1. Work to disarm the hated white male demographic.
2. Do nothing about minority on minority gun violence.

Keeps the white male subdued and keeps the minorities killing each other. That, my friends, is a feature and not a bug to the Democrats.

Despite what tom thinks, that is the #1 losing issue for the left. If dems got power and tried it, they wouldn't be in power long. There would be another tea party wave.

(11-17-2018 12:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 10:28 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

Swalwell represents the great state of Kalifornia. We all know it is a breeding ground for moonbats. He ended up stating he was being sarcastic with using nukes but his point is clear: he wants gun control forced upon the people by the arm of government. Gee, that will work.

If the alternative to gun control forced upon people by the arm of government is continued and increasing mass shootings....then eventually people will make it work.

You guys have lost the popular vote in every single Presidential election since 1988 but one. The Dems had their best national vote margin since the 1970's last week.

Gun control is VERY popular. VERY popular.

---

The smart move is to concede what you can concede while you still have some leverage. This carnage continues through 2021, and you might find yourselves with something you really don't want.

People will have zero patience for a Cliven Bundy style uprising. Zero. In the case of a revolt, President will call out the National Guard and they will comply.

----

America is saying 'enough!' to the carnage.

Geeezus, I’m just now reading through all this psycho-babble, and I keep coming across this one “point”,

Who the hell did the 75 YO cowboy Cliven Bundy ever hurt?

Which of these mass shooting perps was a “far right-winger”?

Sandy hook? Pulse, perhaps? I-95 assassins?

Can you point us to one?

(11-17-2018 04:23 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 01:13 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Love the double standard here. If this is a GOP politician, progs will rail against him and accuse him of inspiring violence. Since it’s a Dem who said this, it’s laughed off as a guy spouting nonsense and telling us it doesn’t mean anything.

I must have missed all those leftists shooting up and bombing right wingers.

Lol, *sigh* yea, you must have.

Representative Scalise, Matt Mika and two cap hill officers would like a word. And I guess you’ve never heard of Ted kazinski or the weather underground?!?

Where ya been?

(11-16-2018 08:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Swalwell's comment was dumb. But understand this, Dems are in no mood to put up with more Cliven Bundy type behavior. Or for gun advocates who talk of rebellion.

And the Guns Everywhere advocacy groups aren't very popular right now. I found it instructive that candidates in the South were running on a gun control platform and winning on it. Beto nearly won in Texas on a strong gun control platform.

I think you might decide what you guys find really important as we move forward.

Gun owner's don't care what Dems are in the mood for. That's the entire point of the 2nd.

(11-17-2018 02:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 12:48 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 11:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

They joined to support and defend the Constitution, and would defect if some lunatic like swalwell ordered them to nuke their own citizens.

Swalwell isn't a lunatic, but just used some unfortunate words talking to an internet troll who wanted to spread the "Red Dawn" fantasy.

If the Dems take full control, expect some gun control measures. Expect some idiot to try to openly defy it. Expect the state to force compliance. Expect no one who supported the Dems to be mad at the Dems for what happens.

The time is now to work out some gun control compromises. Not later. Think about it.

What, you mean like getting nuked?

(11-19-2018 03:47 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 08:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Swalwell's comment was dumb. But understand this, Dems are in no mood to put up with more Cliven Bundy type behavior. Or for gun advocates who talk of rebellion.

And the Guns Everywhere advocacy groups aren't very popular right now. I found it instructive that candidates in the South were running on a gun control platform and winning on it. Beto nearly won in Texas on a strong gun control platform.

I think you might decide what you guys find really important as we move forward.

Gun owner's don't care what Dems are in the mood for. That's the entire point of the 2nd.

Lol, right?

I’m not interested in a “conversation” about my rights. They are not up for debate.