(11-16-2018 09:17 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Tom would have been pro confiscation of guns from Blacks defending themselves from the KKK. He doesn't realize though.

https://youtu.be/9pdpLAn8mh4

So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

(11-16-2018 10:28 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

Swalwell represents the great state of Kalifornia. We all know it is a breeding ground for moonbats. He ended up stating he was being sarcastic with using nukes but his point is clear: he wants gun control forced upon the people by the arm of government. Gee, that will work.

If the alternative to gun control forced upon people by the arm of government is continued and increasing mass shootings....then eventually people will make it work.

You guys have lost the popular vote in every single Presidential election since 1988 but one. The Dems had their best national vote margin since the 1970's last week.

Gun control is VERY popular. VERY popular.

---

The smart move is to concede what you can concede while you still have some leverage. This carnage continues through 2021, and you might find yourselves with something you really don't want.

People will have zero patience for a Cliven Bundy style uprising. Zero. In the case of a revolt, President will call out the National Guard and they will comply.

----

America is saying 'enough!' to the carnage.

(11-17-2018 11:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

Oh and the people in the government carrying the guns? Overwhelmingly conservative.

Sleep easy comrade!

(11-17-2018 11:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

They joined to support and defend the Constitution, and would defect if some lunatic like swalwell ordered them to nuke their own citizens.

Of course Styx covered this today. The top comment on his video cracks me up..

If I have five guns, and the government takes four, how many do I have left? ....thirty seven, I lied about having five.

Love the double standard here. If this is a GOP politician, progs will rail against him and accuse him of inspiring violence. Since it’s a Dem who said this, it’s laughed off as a guy spouting nonsense and telling us it doesn’t mean anything.

(11-17-2018 01:13 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Love the double standard here. If this is a GOP politician, progs will rail against him and accuse him of inspiring violence. Since it’s a Dem who said this, it’s laughed off as a guy spouting nonsense and telling us it doesn’t mean anything.

swalwell has said in the past that people should be taken at their word when it comes making threats like he made.

(11-17-2018 12:48 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 11:53 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 08:51 AM)q5sys Wrote:  So Tom doesn't want to have a gun for when Trump/Putin comes to try to put him in one of those gay concentration camps he likes to talk about.
I figured Tom would want to personally defend himself from the "oppressive regime" he keeps screaming about.

Guys, life ain't "Red Dawn". If the government comes for me or YOU, a gun isn't going to save me or you either. They have more of them and they're better armed.

They joined to support and defend the Constitution, and would defect if some lunatic like swalwell ordered them to nuke their own citizens.

Swalwell isn't a lunatic, but just used some unfortunate words talking to an internet troll who wanted to spread the "Red Dawn" fantasy.

If the Dems take full control, expect some gun control measures. Expect some idiot to try to openly defy it. Expect the state to force compliance. Expect no one who supported the Dems to be mad at the Dems for what happens.

The time is now to work out some gun control compromises. Not later. Think about it.

Meh, I wouldn’t call it a threat.

It’s certainly indicative of the contempt his ilk hold the average American in.

(11-17-2018 02:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Swalwell isn't a lunatic

swalwell is a lunatic, and he made the mistake of letting slip what he actually thinks.

Watch the above video (particularly the part that starts at 3:15), it nails you and the alt-left to a 'T'. It gives you some sick, sadistic pleasure thinking about the government forcing itself upon your political enemies.

(11-17-2018 02:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Expect no one who supported the Dems to be mad at the Dems for what happens.

And what's that, exactly?

1 chamber of power (that hasn't even been sworn in yet), and this is already the kind of talk we're getting. Wow.

(11-17-2018 12:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2018 10:28 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

Swalwell represents the great state of Kalifornia. We all know it is a breeding ground for moonbats. He ended up stating he was being sarcastic with using nukes but his point is clear: he wants gun control forced upon the people by the arm of government. Gee, that will work.

If the alternative to gun control forced upon people by the arm of government is continued and increasing mass shootings....then eventually people will make it work.

You guys have lost the popular vote in every single Presidential election since 1988 but one. The Dems had their best national vote margin since the 1970's last week.

Gun control is VERY popular. VERY popular.

---

The smart move is to concede what you can concede while you still have some leverage. This carnage continues through 2021, and you might find yourselves with something you really don't want.

People will have zero patience for a Cliven Bundy style uprising. Zero. In the case of a revolt, President will call out the National Guard and they will comply.

----

America is saying 'enough!' to the carnage.

Anyone who would draft up a bill to confiscate guns from citizens would be flogged.
An no gun "control" whatever the hell that means is not popular. It might be popular among far left radical like you though.

(11-17-2018 02:54 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Anyone who would draft up a bill to confiscate guns from citizens would be flogged.
An no gun "control" whatever the hell that means is not popular. It might be popular among far left radical like you though.

In before tom cites some push poll that asked "Do you want children to die?", and then says it's evidence that 99% of the population agrees with universal background checks.

Turns out the Uranium wasn't sold to Russia, but stockpiled in Styrofoam coolers in the DNC server room. That's why the DNC won't let the FBI near it. By the time the FBI gets a subpoena for the server, the DNC will nuke the NRA and blame it on Russia.

Unfortunately for the DNC, Swalwell is making these threats. He'll end up with two shots to the back. Look for robberies to increase near his home before he dies.

Then he'll get a participation award for all he's done:

(11-17-2018 02:58 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 02:54 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Anyone who would draft up a bill to confiscate guns from citizens would be flogged.
An no gun "control" whatever the hell that means is not popular. It might be popular among far left radical like you though.

In before tom cites some push poll that asked "Do you want children to die?", and then says it's evidence that 99% of the population agrees with universal background checks.

A good analogy is that harassing and assaulting Trump voters is very very popular.....among Tom's crowd it is.

(11-17-2018 01:13 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Love the double standard here. If this is a GOP politician, progs will rail against him and accuse him of inspiring violence. Since it’s a Dem who said this, it’s laughed off as a guy spouting nonsense and telling us it doesn’t mean anything.

I must have missed all those leftists shooting up and bombing right wingers.

(11-17-2018 04:23 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-17-2018 01:13 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Love the double standard here. If this is a GOP politician, progs will rail against him and accuse him of inspiring violence. Since it’s a Dem who said this, it’s laughed off as a guy spouting nonsense and telling us it doesn’t mean anything.

I must have missed all those leftists shooting up and bombing right wingers.

I guess you missed Bernie supporter James Hodgkinson. You know, the left wing nut that shot up GOP congressman at a baseball field?

(11-16-2018 08:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Swalwell's comment was dumb. But understand this, Dems are in no mood to put up with more Cliven Bundy type behavior. Or for gun advocates who talk of rebellion.

And the Guns Everywhere advocacy groups aren't very popular right now. I found it instructive that candidates in the South were running on a gun control platform and winning on it. Beto nearly won in Texas on a strong gun control platform.

I think you might decide what you guys find really important as we move forward.

And understand that Conservatives will not let the Constitution die.