Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Gamblers betting on Republicans
Author Message
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,435
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 391
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-29-2018 05:53 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Oh boy, if that’s true and polling is 6 points off in favor of dems, 60+ seats is a possibility in the Senate.

57

OUTSIDE CHANCE
10-29-2018 07:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 39,240
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3580
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-29-2018 05:53 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Veteran GOP consultant Greg Keller is now projecting an 8-point victory in Missouri for Hawley.

Oh boy, if that’s true and polling is 6 points off in favor of dems, 60+ seats is a possibility in the Senate.

Brace for impact. New poll Has Sherrod Brown only +6 in OH senate race. Prior polling had him +13 to +18.
10-30-2018 12:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 25,395
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 2357
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #23
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-28-2018 10:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...800052002/

Be interesting to see who is right, gamblers or Nate. Republicans are the favorites to hold the House in Vegas.

Finally. So, Nate Silver is the guy who has been referred to here as "muh Nate?" Thanks for answering that mystery.
10-30-2018 01:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 12:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(10-29-2018 05:53 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Veteran GOP consultant Greg Keller is now projecting an 8-point victory in Missouri for Hawley.

Oh boy, if that’s true and polling is 6 points off in favor of dems, 60+ seats is a possibility in the Senate.

Brace for impact. New poll Has Sherrod Brown only +6 in OH senate race. Prior polling had him +13 to +18.

Pennsylvania, Ohio, Minnesota, Michigan and even West Virginia have had very limited polling. Those states will be much closer than those mostly pre-Labor Day polls show.

60 is a long shot, but possible. Everything would have to break the Democrats way to limit the Republicans to 50. I'm thinking 56 Republicans. Hold all seats, add ND, IN, MO, FL and one out of NJ/MN/WI/MI/MT.
10-30-2018 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
There are some polls like the early ones in Texas and in Georgia that don't ring true. If they are off and that pattern is true across the country, the Republicans might even gain seats in the House. We'll see how big the silent majority is.
10-30-2018 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 25,395
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 2357
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #26
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-28-2018 10:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Also, many of the other 40 some-odd contested races are razor thin one way or the other, so turnout is going to be key. While polling on turnout still gives a slight lead to democrats, actual returns in voting shows a significant lead in turnout for republicans.

How's the weather lookin' next Tuesday across key battlegrounds? Republicans historically more likely to still come out to vote in elections, even in off-year and bad weather. A national rainstorm would make the Dems all wet!


10-30-2018 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
49RFootballNow Offline
He who walks without rhythm
*

Posts: 13,068
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 987
I Root For: Charlotte 49ers
Location: Metrolina
Post: #27
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
[Image: The_Gambler_-_Kenny_Rogers.jpg]
10-30-2018 01:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 39,240
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3580
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 01:01 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  
(10-28-2018 10:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...800052002/

Be interesting to see who is right, gamblers or Nate. Republicans are the favorites to hold the House in Vegas.

Finally. So, Nate Silver is the guy who has been referred to here as "muh Nate?" Thanks for answering that mystery.

Yep.

Late on election night 2016, when the NYT's prediction meter had moved to a 72% chance of Trump winning, Nate still gave Hillary a 78% chance of winning.
10-30-2018 01:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 01:28 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 01:01 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  
(10-28-2018 10:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...800052002/

Be interesting to see who is right, gamblers or Nate. Republicans are the favorites to hold the House in Vegas.

Finally. So, Nate Silver is the guy who has been referred to here as "muh Nate?" Thanks for answering that mystery.

Yep.

Late on election night 2016, when the NYT's prediction meter had moved to a 72% chance of Trump winning, Nate still gave Hillary a 78% chance of winning.

He has this air that he is objective, but when he did that piece a week before the election that he prefaced with, "I don't mean to scare anyone, but there is a 25% (or something like that) chance of Trump winning." No professional would say that.
10-30-2018 01:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...retch.html

Good discussion on the House election. Some key quotes:

"...The consensus view is that Democrats are favored to take the lower chamber. Analysts disagree on just how large a majority they are likely to win, and how likely that majority is. If you split the RealClearPolitics tossups in half, it results in Democrats gaining about 25 seats, for a narrow 220-215 majority. I tend to think that the tossups will break disproportionately toward Democrats, and see something more on the order of a 225-210 Democratic majority, but this is hair-splitting to a certain degree...."

"Will there be a late break? As we learned in 2016, and in a less dramatic fashion in 2014, a late break in the races can alter the landscape substantially. This year, there are a lot of undecided voters remaining. Look at the most recent House polling from the New York Times/Siena: In some races, the leading candidates are at 43 percent (IA-03), 45 percent (UT-04, PA-10, NJ-03), and 44 percent (NY-11). Moreover, the trailing candidate is typically only behind by a point or two...."

"How many votes are Democrats wasting? One of the biggest news stories this cycle has been the massive influx of cash into Democratic campaigns. This initially showed up in marquee races, such as Beto O’Rourke’s challenge to Ted Cruz, but it has since filtered down into more marginal ones. Consider Indiana’s 9th District, where GOP incumbent Trey Hollingsworth has been outspent 2 to 1 by his challenger. Or California’s 1st, where Doug LaMalfa has been matched by his opponent. Both districts are heavily Republican and unlikely to flip. At the same time, the Democrats can probably use this cash to mobilize “low-hanging fruit” in these districts. In other words, Democrats may not win there, but will probably substantially overperform their typical showing.

This is relevant because Democrats right now have roughly a 7 1/2-point lead on the generic ballot, which asks which party people would prefer to have control Congress. Normally this would be enough to flip the majority. But if Democrats run up the score in districts that they are unlikely to win, suddenly that seven-point margin translates into a closer-than-expected seat share...."

"Are we relying too much on one pollster? This is a pretty straightforward concern. So far, most of our House race polling has come from the New York Times, in partnership with Siena. On the one hand, this is good, because without them we would have virtually no polling. On the other hand, polling is both an art and a science, and having a disproportionate amount of our data coming from a single view of what the electorate looks like increases the chances of No. 3 (above) occurring. ..."
10-30-2018 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcat65 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,754
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 365
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 12:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  
(10-29-2018 05:53 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Veteran GOP consultant Greg Keller is now projecting an 8-point victory in Missouri for Hawley.

Oh boy, if that’s true and polling is 6 points off in favor of dems, 60+ seats is a possibility in the Senate.

Brace for impact. New poll Has Sherrod Brown only +6 in OH senate race. Prior polling had him +13 to +18.

Ohio has a gubernatorial race and Brown's fate depends on which party is more motivated. If a large number of voters turn out to vote for Dewine then I don't see Brown winning. I certainly hope Brown gets beat. He is also a leading recipient of lobbyist funds.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...ists-money
10-30-2018 01:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,435
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 391
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 01:32 PM)bullet Wrote:  He has this air that he is objective



https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status...9909189632

HOUSE POODLE
10-30-2018 02:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lord Stanley Offline
L'Étoile du Nord
*

Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
Post: #33
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 02:03 PM)green Wrote:  HOUSE POODLE

On a separate note my neighbor has (I swear to Huskie Jebus) a hunting poodle and it's an awesome dog. Much cooler than the dumbace lab on the other side of me that I recently found eating baking soda in my shed

[Image: rick_aboutus.jpg]
10-30-2018 02:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
olliebaba Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 28,237
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 2175
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
Post: #34
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
I've heard that poodles in reality are pretty mean dogs. Is that true?
11-01-2018 05:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,803
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #35
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-30-2018 02:20 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 02:03 PM)green Wrote:  HOUSE POODLE
On a separate note my neighbor has (I swear to Huskie Jebus) a hunting poodle and it's an awesome dog. Much cooler than the dumbace lab on the other side of me that I recently found eating baking soda in my shed
[Image: rick_aboutus.jpg]

Poodles were originally bred as hunting dogs. Many of the poodle hair cuts were developed to keep them from getting too caught up in brush and stuff when hunting.
11-01-2018 05:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kronke Offline
Banned

Posts: 29,379
Joined: Apr 2010
I Root For: Arsenal / StL
Location: Missouri
Post: #36
Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-28-2018 10:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  There's a couple of things going on on the house side. First, polling is significantly tightening in the CA races that dems hoped to flip. About 1/3rd of the seats needed to regain the house were being counted on coming from CA, and those races arent looking great for them now. Another issue democrats are battlig there is that there is a republican candidate for governor who is polling quite well, and he may be able to drive some votes in those particular CA republican seats to allow them to remain republican.

Also, many of the other 40 some-odd contested races are razor thin one way or the other, so turnout is going to be key. While polling on turnout still gives a slight lead to democrats, actual returns in voting shows a significant lead in turnout for republicans.


Just saw this video. Dems are doing absolutely nothing out of the ordinary so far in california. No signs of a blue wave whatsoever.


(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 05:53 PM by Kronke.)
11-01-2018 05:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1293
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #37
RE: Gamblers betting on Republicans
(10-29-2018 11:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Republicans are disenfranchised in California due to the jungle primary system. Its the reason Hillary was able to win the popular vote. In the presidential election, republicans didnt have a senator to vote for, or a house member in many of the districts.

And legalizing pot was on the ballot... but not in a way that impacted conservative CV farmers

That said, I still don't buy polls. Too many variables these days


(11-01-2018 05:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 02:20 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 02:03 PM)green Wrote:  HOUSE POODLE
On a separate note my neighbor has (I swear to Huskie Jebus) a hunting poodle and it's an awesome dog. Much cooler than the dumbace lab on the other side of me that I recently found eating baking soda in my shed
[Image: rick_aboutus.jpg]

Poodles were originally bred as hunting dogs. Many of the poodle hair cuts were developed to keep them from getting too caught up in brush and stuff when hunting.

This. Serous canines on these canines... and smart as hell.

STANDARD poodles, that is. Minis were (like all small breeds) grossly over-bread and for bad features.
11-01-2018 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.