cadillacman
Water Engineer
Posts: 39
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation: 0
I Root For: USM
Location:
|
Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
Now, I'm not putting all of our problems on Tez..
I don't want to hear about potential anymore. I don't want to hear about all the experience he has anymore.
There is no way that this guy should be a starting running back. Dare I say that T'Rod and George are gone because they couldn't get touches.
Yes, we don't too much creative play calling, but he gets knocked off his wheel too easy when he is going sideline to sideline.
Hell, when he is going North or South, he's not moving the pile either.
Put the guy at flanker or use him as a third down guy. But he is not a starter.
I'd rather have one of the young RB's get more touches than Tez.
Cadillacman
|
|
10-01-2018 10:43 AM |
|
va-eagle
1st String
Posts: 2,299
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 90
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Roanoke
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
My comment from a different thread on this topic...
Only personnel changes I see need to be made is Mosley start at RB and Anderson get 5-8 carries.
vs Auburn
Mosley had 4 carries for 25 yards.
Parks had 5 carriers for 5 yards.
|
|
10-01-2018 11:26 AM |
|
TTT
#SMTTT
Posts: 5,326
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 226
I Root For: USM & G5
Location: The Burg
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
ReggieFavre just got triggered.
|
|
10-01-2018 04:24 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 69,050
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7088
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
(10-01-2018 04:24 PM)TTT Wrote: ReggieFavre just got triggered.
|
|
10-01-2018 07:22 PM |
|
TTT
#SMTTT
Posts: 5,326
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 226
I Root For: USM & G5
Location: The Burg
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
Honestly, Tez is a much better WR than a RB and his receiving stats prove this. His frame is more suited for WR too at 6'1 210.
Another thing to note: next year we return all 5 starting OL, Moseley/Anderson, JA, Jaylond, Quez, Harris...I think we have the potential to be pretty dang good this year on O. Next year we're gonna be a force.
|
|
10-01-2018 09:20 PM |
|
eaglebeaver
Heisman
Posts: 6,202
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 247
I Root For: southern miss
Location:
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
(10-01-2018 09:20 PM)TTT Wrote: Honestly, Tez is a much better WR than a RB and his receiving stats prove this. His frame is more suited for WR too at 6'1 210.
Another thing to note: next year we return all 5 starting OL, Moseley/Anderson, JA, Jaylond, Quez, Harris...I think we have the potential to be pretty dang good this year on O. Next year we're gonna be a force.
|
|
10-02-2018 10:42 AM |
|
cadillacman
Water Engineer
Posts: 39
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation: 0
I Root For: USM
Location:
|
RE: Tez Parks is Not a Starting Running Back
(10-01-2018 09:20 PM)TTT Wrote: Honestly, Tez is a much better WR than a RB and his receiving stats prove this. His frame is more suited for WR too at 6'1 210.
Another thing to note: next year we return all 5 starting OL, Moseley/Anderson, JA, Jaylond, Quez, Harris...I think we have the potential to be pretty dang good this year on O. Next year we're gonna be a force.
Yes, there is light at the end of the tunnel. I get the feeling this is 2017 all over again. Hopson has an idea that Keon is head and shoulders better than Griggs and we pay for it in the end.
Tez is a much better receiver than a running back. We just need to put him in a better position to help us. Moseley is the likely candidate to get the bulk of the carries. But who cares.. next man up. I'm preaching to the choir, this has put too much weight on a young passing game.
|
|
10-03-2018 03:28 AM |
|