(08-22-2018 06:46 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:20 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 07:33 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Compromised verdict...

I hate to say I told you so.

The lawyer calling trial by jury compromised lolol.

That’s what that’s called.

Jesus you love to show off how damn dumb you are.

But, I’m glad I didn’t bet you on the outcome.

Wouldn't matter he'd welshed on it.

(08-22-2018 06:45 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:46 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:40 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:26 PM)JUSTGOPLAY Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 04:25 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Well before you pop the top on the lotion you may wanna wait and see what the sentencing is or what the plea deal was for.

Exactly....This is like Groundhog Day, or Charlie Brown and Lucy with the football. It's almost comical how our leftist friends, generally fueled by a corrupt MSM, get a big ole throbbin chubby goin every time one of these snipe hunts comes along........I get the impression that Trump just loves this shyte.

You're right. It does make me happy when felons get their comeuppance. Does it make you sad when criminals see their crimes get punished?

all politicians, past, present and their supporters should undergo the same scrutiny

Agreed.

Let's have someone from the RNC or a Republican "agent" create a dossier containing fake information claiming something as ridiculous as "collusion" about a demmie then use that dossier as "proof" of illegal activity in order to have a special counsel investigation launched.

From there, we can put every person remotely connected to that person thru the ringer examining every aspect of their life, even those that happened BEFORE their involvement with said candidate in order to get "convictions".

How can ANYONE who claims to value the legal process think THAT is perfectly acceptable?

Just the idea of using fake/untrue information as the basis for instituting investigations reeks of star chamber justice.

For all the people yucking it up over the convictions, remember this....

What comes around goes around. YOU set the standards so don't be surprised if it comes back to bite you in the backside.

Think Harry and his nuclear option for judges......

They never even let their mind consider that question.

(08-22-2018 08:14 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 06:45 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:46 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:40 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:26 PM)JUSTGOPLAY Wrote:  Exactly....This is like Groundhog Day, or Charlie Brown and Lucy with the football. It's almost comical how our leftist friends, generally fueled by a corrupt MSM, get a big ole throbbin chubby goin every time one of these snipe hunts comes along........I get the impression that Trump just loves this shyte.

You're right. It does make me happy when felons get their comeuppance. Does it make you sad when criminals see their crimes get punished?

all politicians, past, present and their supporters should undergo the same scrutiny

Agreed.

Let's have someone from the RNC or a Republican "agent" create a dossier containing fake information claiming something as ridiculous as "collusion" about a demmie then use that dossier as "proof" of illegal activity in order to have a special counsel investigation launched.

From there, we can put every person remotely connected to that person thru the ringer examining every aspect of their life, even those that happened BEFORE their involvement with said candidate in order to get "convictions".

How can ANYONE who claims to value the legal process think THAT is perfectly acceptable?

Just the idea of using fake/untrue information as the basis for instituting investigations reeks of star chamber justice.

For all the people yucking it up over the convictions, remember this....

What comes around goes around. YOU set the standards so don't be surprised if it comes back to bite you in the backside.

Think Harry and his nuclear option for judges......

They never even let their mind consider that question.

Don't forget Biden introducing the rule that a lame duck president can't appoint a Supreme Court Justice in 1992.

(08-22-2018 06:46 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:20 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 07:33 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Compromised verdict...

I hate to say I told you so.

The lawyer calling trial by jury compromised lolol.

That’s what that’s called.

Jesus you love to show off how damn dumb you are.

But, I’m glad I didn’t bet you on the outcome.

Can we drop the insults and just elaborate on what you mean please? Us non-lawyers would sorta like to know.

Thanks.

(08-22-2018 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 06:46 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:20 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 07:33 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Compromised verdict...

I hate to say I told you so.

The lawyer calling trial by jury compromised lolol.

That’s what that’s called.

Jesus you love to show off how damn dumb you are.

But, I’m glad I didn’t bet you on the outcome.

Can we drop the insults and just elaborate on what you mean please? Us non-lawyers would sorta like to know.

Thanks.

Had to google. Legal term.

Quote:Compromise verdict refers to a verdict that is reached when the jurors,for the purpose of avoiding a deadlock,concede to some issues so that other issues will be resolved as they want. In such cases one set of jurors sides with a second in exchange for the second group agreeing on something else with the first.

(08-22-2018 08:43 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 06:46 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:20 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 07:33 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Compromised verdict...

I hate to say I told you so.

The lawyer calling trial by jury compromised lolol.

That’s what that’s called.

Jesus you love to show off how damn dumb you are.

But, I’m glad I didn’t bet you on the outcome.

Can we drop the insults and just elaborate on what you mean please? Us non-lawyers would sorta like to know.

Thanks.

Had to google. Legal term.

Quote:Compromise verdict refers to a verdict that is reached when the jurors,for the purpose of avoiding a deadlock,concede to some issues so that other issues will be resolved as they want. In such cases one set of jurors sides with a second in exchange for the second group agreeing on something else with the first.

Not sure how you keep getting double posts JD, but you can delete them.

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... dont burst their bubbles!

(08-22-2018 09:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... don burst their bubbles!

And I won't burst your bubble to tell you that everyone here already knows this and is not saying otherwise.

The only connection to trump is that he hired the guy and should have probably vetted him better. At least the only connection until Mueller is done.

(08-22-2018 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... don burst their bubbles!

And I won't burst your bubble to tell you that everyone here already knows this and is not saying otherwise.

The only connection to trump is that he hired the guy and should have probably vetted him better. At least the only connection until Mueller is done.

You are starting to sound like Mach... I would stop right there if I was you, or you will be eating crow every day of your life like he has been doing since Trump was elected President of the United States of America...

(08-22-2018 09:06 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... don burst their bubbles!

And I won't burst your bubble to tell you that everyone here already knows this and is not saying otherwise.

The only connection to trump is that he hired the guy and should have probably vetted him better. At least the only connection until Mueller is done.

You are starting to sound like Mach... I would stop right there if I was you, or you will be eating crow every day of your life like he has been doing since Trump was elected President of the United States of America...

Wah.

(08-21-2018 07:33 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Compromised verdict...

I hate to say I told you so.

Just tuning in to this thread, what does that mean?

Compromised verdict? Meaning 8 guilty charges, 10 hung? Does that somehow matter?

Or is that, CV, something else?

Interesting

(08-22-2018 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... don burst their bubbles!

And I won't burst your bubble to tell you that everyone here already knows this and is not saying otherwise.

The only connection to trump is that he hired the guy and should have probably vetted him better. At least the only connection until Mueller is done.

Lot of shady people live in New York. Anthony Weiner with access to classified information from the Secretary of State? Husband of the right hand woman to the Democratic presidential candidate.

Trump was in the construction industry. The construction unions are run by the mob there. He dealt with lots of shady people as does anyone in real estate in New York City.

(08-22-2018 09:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:06 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:47 PM)450bench Wrote:  Nothing to do with Trump...zero...the lib circle jerrk continues

shhhhhh... don burst their bubbles!

And I won't burst your bubble to tell you that everyone here already knows this and is not saying otherwise.

The only connection to trump is that he hired the guy and should have probably vetted him better. At least the only connection until Mueller is done.

You are starting to sound like Mach... I would stop right there if I was you, or you will be eating crow every day of your life like he has been doing since Trump was elected President of the United States of America...

Wah.

I know, it must be hard... sorry that you have been crying this whole time.

(08-21-2018 05:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 04:25 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 04:22 PM)Momus Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 04:20 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wasn't this already a thread?

I provided a link as requested. The point is still that Trump’s campaign chair and personal attorney are both going to jail.

Or getting probation, or getting pardoned. We shall see. I think Cohen is going to jail, not sure about Manafort. I could see him getting probation because the judge didnt seem to think much of the prosecutions tactics. Also could see Manafort gettinh pardoned or commuted. No chance for cohen.

you can pen than in now.....it's a gimme after the mids....

it too stupid how none of all this bs has one iota to do with the 'why'.....

bye-bye.....ewe dicked yourself too....

The stink of this administration won't wash away easily.

(08-22-2018 09:09 AM)bullet Wrote:  Trump was in the construction industry. The construction unions are run by the mob there. He dealt with lots of shady people as does anyone in real estate in New York City.

Was he dealing with lots of shady people, or was he shady himself? That's the question. And by shady, I mean illegal.

The NY Mafia became greatly reduced in power 25 years ago. We may find that Trump's "shadiness" actually increased after that time.

Just because Manafort's prosecution was politically motivated doesn't mean he's innocent.

However, if I were Trump he'd get pardoned on my last day in office. No, he'd get pardoned the day after the Presidential election so there would be lots of time for it to stir people up.

(08-22-2018 09:53 AM)Claw Wrote:  Just because Manafort's prosecution was politically motivated doesn't mean he's innocent.

However, if I were Trump he'd get pardoned on my last day in office. No, he'd get pardoned the day after the Presidential election so there would be lots of time for it to stir people up.

He should be pardoned on the not reporting foreign accounts. That's a civil problem. And if the banks are whole, on the bank fraud.

He was found guilty on tax fraud. I wouldn't pardon him on that.

(08-22-2018 09:58 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 09:53 AM)Claw Wrote:  Just because Manafort's prosecution was politically motivated doesn't mean he's innocent.

However, if I were Trump he'd get pardoned on my last day in office. No, he'd get pardoned the day after the Presidential election so there would be lots of time for it to stir people up.

He should be pardoned on the not reporting foreign accounts. That's a civil problem. And if the banks are whole, on the bank fraud.

He was found guilty on tax fraud. I wouldn't pardon him on that.

everybody cheats on their taxes in some fashion.....you're a dumbarse if you don't....

yeah, I wanna pay for other people's free shite and promote lack of incentive......that's just dayum stupid...

today's software alone guides you within the 'how to'....

the only ones that don't are the ones that cannot pay taxes....

it's called, 'working within the acceptable range'....