(08-22-2018 01:21 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 10:24 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Just checking in. Is the magnificent orange emperor still running the show or have the democrats slipped down one more rung into madness

According to the orange fool, "they run a big operation". So apparently, president fat and lazy isn't running a damn thing. Just his mouth. Talking tough, but showing he's a small pathetic clown behind the scenes. It's a shame you bow down and worship the fake wizard of Oz. Sad


The orange clown is tweeting about the NFL again, now you know he's really panicking about yesterday.

if we all started to dress up like dorothy and had a gay cat named toto, would that help heal your wounds my son.....

(08-22-2018 04:34 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 03:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 02:50 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 02:00 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 12:53 PM)450bench Wrote:  You libs are in a gun fight with the right and you're arming yourselves with butter knives and extra long tooth picks.
You have no chance and have only yourselves to blame.
Give yourselves participation trophies for coming in last and have yourselves a nice latte at Starbucks.

Sick burn dude, really nailed it with that latte joke. I guess now those felony convictions didn’t happen.

Real liberals don't drink at Starbucks anyway. We skip that for our local ma n pa offerings to keep it hip

and also belch on bets...

+3 on that one.

No shame in that one!

Your choice as president is a criminal who has abandoned virtually all conservative ideaology, has grown the deficit during a period of economic growth, never built the wall, flagrantly profited from the government, has appointed multiple family members to roles in the government against all ethical concerns, and now officially had 5 convicted felons in his campaign.

But hey, it’s not all bad, at least you guys got this going for you.

(08-22-2018 04:53 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 04:34 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 03:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 02:50 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(08-22-2018 02:00 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Sick burn dude, really nailed it with that latte joke. I guess now those felony convictions didn’t happen.

Real liberals don't drink at Starbucks anyway. We skip that for our local ma n pa offerings to keep it hip

and also belch on bets...

+3 on that one.

No shame in that one!

Your choice as president is a criminal who has abandoned virtually all conservative ideaology, has grown the deficit during a period of economic growth, never built the wall, flagrantly profited from the government, has appointed multiple family members to roles in the government against all ethical concerns, and now officially had 5 convicted felons in his campaign.

But hey, it’s not all bad, at least you guys got this going for you.

and your skirts wear tiaras....

https://spectator.us/2018/08/despite-the...unscathed/

"...That’s it in a nutshell. There will now be a feeding frenzy of speculation about how, or if, yesterday’s spectacles of prosecutorial power will affect the President. The court of public opinion seems to have turned decisively against Robert Mueller and his legal piranhas. Maybe their full-court press will unseat the President. It is a foregone conclusion, at any rate, that should the Democrats take the House by more than a narrow margin, Donald Trump will be impeached. He would not, I am convinced, be convicted by the Senate, but the impeachment itself would be messy.

Still, that is a big ‘if’. Were I a betting man, I would bet against it happening. The larger question is how long the public will stand for this bloody and ostentatious effort to reverse the results of a free, open, and democratic election. The clock is ticking.

(08-22-2018 05:06 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://spectator.us/2018/08/despite-the...unscathed/

"...That’s it in a nutshell. There will now be a feeding frenzy of speculation about how, or if, yesterday’s spectacles of prosecutorial power will affect the President. The court of public opinion seems to have turned decisively against Robert Mueller and his legal piranhas. Maybe their full-court press will unseat the President. It is a foregone conclusion, at any rate, that should the Democrats take the House by more than a narrow margin, Donald Trump will be impeached. He would not, I am convinced, be convicted by the Senate, but the impeachment itself would be messy.

Still, that is a big ‘if’. Were I a betting man, I would bet against it happening. The larger question is how long the public will stand for this bloody and ostentatious effort to reverse the results of a free, open, and democratic election. The clock is ticking.

all this bs is pouring more fuel on the fire....

they're dicking around with the wrong folk.....kinda like '16

it was a gimme Mueller would play his hand about now.....

watch how DJT raises the ante come October......

we're patient folk......and make fun of the dippos along the way.....

(08-22-2018 05:06 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://spectator.us/2018/08/despite-the...unscathed/

"...That’s it in a nutshell. There will now be a feeding frenzy of speculation about how, or if, yesterday’s spectacles of prosecutorial power will affect the President. The court of public opinion seems to have turned decisively against Robert Mueller and his legal piranhas. Maybe their full-court press will unseat the President. It is a foregone conclusion, at any rate, that should the Democrats take the House by more than a narrow margin, Donald Trump will be impeached. He would not, I am convinced, be convicted by the Senate, but the impeachment itself would be messy.

Still, that is a big ‘if’. Were I a betting man, I would bet against it happening. The larger question is how long the public will stand for this bloody and ostentatious effort to reverse the results of a free, open, and democratic election. The clock is ticking.

I’d sure love a source for that claim. I know it was in the quote, but are they just stating that apropos of nothing?

1 juror spoke out about (decided?) Manafort's guilt while the prosecution was still presenting it's case, and had to be reprimanded by Ellis.

Click for thread.

(08-22-2018 06:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  1 juror spoke out about (decided?) Manafort's guilt while the prosecution was still presenting it's case, and had to be reprimanded by Ellis.

Click for thread.

She should have been replaced by one of the alternates. And maybe she was.

If you read the thread, it doesn't sound like she was replaced. She was read the riot act by Ellis (during which she interrupted him multiple times), and ultimately agreed that Manafort had the presumption of innocence.

I'm not saying it swayed anything, I'm just amazed at how dumb you'd have to be to act out like that in such a high profile case.