Well, at least he went further than Mark Zuckerberg who wouldn’t even admit it.

you can't deny what is fact....

however, you can deny and get your nuts kicked in every day if you do that.....

only the clintons and holyweirds have carte blanche playing the sinister w/o repercussion....

people are pissed.....

I respect the guy for saying what he said...criticize when warranted but give credit when it's due

(08-18-2018 11:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  I respect the guy for saying what he said...criticize when warranted but give credit when it's due

Well, he outright lied in the interview also....

"Statement behind the statement, question behind the question.. The term 'shadow banning' that resonates with the most amount of people.."

Then proceeds to debunk his strawman definition.

F**k off, jack. Seriously.

We need hearings. Under oath. Hand over the algorithms. Face up.

(08-19-2018 02:15 AM)Kronke Wrote:  "Statement behind the statement, question behind the question.. The term 'shadow banning' that resonates with the most amount of people.."

Then proceeds to debunk his strawman definition.

F**k off, jack. Seriously.

We need hearings. Under oath. Hand over the algorithms. Face up.

Yep.....