No odds on favorite, but Barrett has the shortest odds.

https://www.predictit.org/Market/3232/Wh...rt-nominee

Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

(06-28-2018 08:16 PM)bullet Wrote:  If you really want a woman nominated, you should find a Baptist female from Indiana who went to IU law school.

Or a Baptist female from Colorado who went to CU law school.

Just realized Barrett almost fits the bill. She's Catholic female from Louisiana who went to Notre Dame law school in Indiana.

(06-29-2018 05:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

(06-29-2018 06:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 05:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

do you realize how stupid that sounds......fk the msm spooge festival....

Paul is correct.....

(06-29-2018 05:24 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-28-2018 08:16 PM)bullet Wrote:  If you really want a woman nominated, you should find a Baptist female from Indiana who went to IU law school.

Or a Baptist female from Colorado who went to CU law school.

Just realized Barrett almost fits the bill. She's Catholic female from Louisiana who went to Notre Dame law school in Indiana.

Interesting. I think all the current justices went to Harvard or Yale.

(06-29-2018 06:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 05:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

do you realize how stupid that sounds......fk the msm spooge festival....

Paul is correct.....

You act like we disagreed. All 3 of us agree he is correct.

And she still is the best possible pick.

The fact that a woman is the best pick makes it all the sweeter.

(06-29-2018 07:07 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 05:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

do you realize how stupid that sounds......fk the msm spooge festival....

Paul is correct.....

You act like we disagreed. All 3 of us agree he is correct.

And she still is the best possible pick.

The fact that a woman is the best pick makes it all the sweeter.

why???

I couldn't care less if it's a woman or a man......why should that matter in any context of thought?

it's a simple question.....

as an example....I'd vote for Nikki Haley in '24 based on what I've seen her display to date.....it dayum sure wouldn't be b/c she was a woman.....

(06-29-2018 07:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:07 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 05:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Enough of the woman or minority bs. Always no matter what the job is go with the best.

All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

do you realize how stupid that sounds......fk the msm spooge festival....

Paul is correct.....

You act like we disagreed. All 3 of us agree he is correct.

And she still is the best possible pick.

The fact that a woman is the best pick makes it all the sweeter.

why???

I couldn't care less if it's a woman or a man......why should that matter?

it's a simple question.....

Why what?

What in the world are you getting so worked up about?

If you really don't care if she's a woman then what is there to argue about?

Gender aside, she is likely the strongest candidate.

(06-29-2018 07:23 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:07 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 06:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  All the top candidates are "the best".

The only thing that really separates them are age, sex, and established originalist and conservative approaches.

Gender aside, Barrett really stands out. The fact that she is a woman is icing on the cake.

do you realize how stupid that sounds......fk the msm spooge festival....

Paul is correct.....

You act like we disagreed. All 3 of us agree he is correct.

And she still is the best possible pick.

The fact that a woman is the best pick makes it all the sweeter.

why???

I couldn't care less if it's a woman or a man......why should that matter?

it's a simple question.....

Why what?

What in the world are you getting so worked up about?

If you really don't care if she's a woman then what is there to argue about?

Gender aside, she is likely the strongest candidate.

see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

(06-29-2018 07:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

You do understand that has nothing to do with her likely being the best candidate?

Does it anger you that the best candidate is likely a woman?

(06-29-2018 07:31 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

You do understand that has nothing to do with her likely being the best candidate?

Does it anger you that the best candidate is likely a woman?

/discussion.....I don't do tangential circle jerky when that was previously defined......

(06-29-2018 07:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:31 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

You do understand that has nothing to do with her likely being the best candidate?

Does it anger you that the best candidate is likely a woman?

/discussion.....I don't do tangential circle jerky when that was previously defined......

You already know the answer to your question. You are mad because I won't play along.

Making prog heads explode and throwing a monkey wrench into their obvious coming attacks would be nice, but there are far better reasons for her to be the pick.

I don't want another Sandra Day O'Conner or David Souter, I want a clear cut originalist. She has one of the strongest track records of being just that. And she is very young.

(06-29-2018 07:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:31 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

You do understand that has nothing to do with her likely being the best candidate?

Does it anger you that the best candidate is likely a woman?

/discussion.....I don't do tangential circle jerky when that was previously defined......

You already know the answer to your question. You are mad because I won't play along.

Making prog heads explode and throwing a monkey wrench into their obvious coming attacks would be nice, but there are far better reasons for her to be the pick.

I don't want another Sandra Day O'Conner or David Souter, I want a clear cut originalist. She has one of the strongest track records of being just that. And she is very young.

I like the fact she is not an IVY leaguer. Need some diversity on that front

(06-29-2018 07:42 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:39 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:31 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 07:26 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  see above edit and thread title......it's the subject of the thread chief.....

edit: you're the one that said, "it makes it all the sweeter"

why?

You do understand that has nothing to do with her likely being the best candidate?

Does it anger you that the best candidate is likely a woman?

/discussion.....I don't do tangential circle jerky when that was previously defined......

You already know the answer to your question. You are mad because I won't play along.

Making prog heads explode and throwing a monkey wrench into their obvious coming attacks would be nice, but there are far better reasons for her to be the pick.

now I'll play my way in line 4 mode.......

you continually back up your religious rhetoric with scripture but cannot provide a simple response to a simple question with anything other than rhetorical bs.....

if you read through the thread I've explained why the subject matter is irrelevant (as have many others)......yet, you continue to fire back with nothing but bs.....

you don't want to pick this fight with me.......I'll hurt your feelings quick like if you continue with your 'nothingness'......and I don't like going there....but I will.....

LET ME PREFACE......IT DOESN'T FK'N MATTER IF IT'S A MAN OR A WOMAN.....

IT'S DISGUSTING HOW MANY TIMES THINGS HAVE TO BE REPEATED TO BEAT INTO NARROW MINDED NUMBSKULLS!!!!

CAPICHE?

How many times now have I said her being the best candidate has nothing to do with gender, but with her record and credentials?

You are making a total ass of yourself, stink.

Step away from the keyboard for a bit until you get your anger under control.

(06-29-2018 08:05 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  You are making a total ass of yourself, stink.

Step away from the keyboard for a bit until you get your anger under control.

please explain how.....

I asked a simple question to your posit.....

you failed to respond other than with nonsensical rhetoric.....

yeah, you got me.....I'm the fool.....

(06-29-2018 08:15 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 08:05 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  You are making a total ass of yourself, stink.

Step away from the keyboard for a bit until you get your anger under control.

please explain how.....

I asked a simple question to your posit.....

you failed to respond other than with nonsensical rhetoric.....

yeah, you got me.....I'm the fool.....

Cry me a river you big baby

(06-29-2018 07:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-29-2018 05:24 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-28-2018 08:16 PM)bullet Wrote:  If you really want a woman nominated, you should find a Baptist female from Indiana who went to IU law school.

Or a Baptist female from Colorado who went to CU law school.

Just realized Barrett almost fits the bill. She's Catholic female from Louisiana who went to Notre Dame law school in Indiana.

Interesting. I think all the current justices went to Harvard or Yale.

That is correct.

Without even knowing who the nominee will be:

Quote:This Must Be Another Bork Moment

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...37380.html