It had everything to do with Russia.

(05-07-2018 10:15 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It had everything to do with Russia.

Maybe it did. But there's no evidence of that so far.

The only way Russia had anything to do with it would be to have changed democrats minds. Made them vote for Trump. What does that say about democrats? Idiots? Of course. Should not have been voting in the first place because they are IDIOTS!

(05-07-2018 10:15 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It had everything to do with Russia.

See, I told you guys he wouldn't disavow the comment. He believes it, and will believe it until the day he dies, no matter what all the evidence in the world might show to the contrary.

So we should send Putin a gift basket for making sure Trump beat that human pudding pop?

(05-07-2018 10:37 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 10:15 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It had everything to do with Russia.

See, I told you guys he wouldn't disavow the comment. He believes it, and will believe it until the day he dies, no matter what all the evidence in the world might show to the contrary.

But that's at least in part because he finds the alternative--that Americans actually voted against Hillary because they did not like her--to be unbelievable.

If you'll remember first off it was the claim was the voting machines were hacked. Then when it was exposed that they are not hooked up to the internet they moved to the next theory.

(05-07-2018 10:37 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 10:15 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It had everything to do with Russia.

See, I told you guys he wouldn't disavow the comment. He believes it, and will believe it until the day he dies, no matter what all the evidence in the world might show to the contrary.

And then again, maybe Putin is paying him. He is certainly doing Putin's work here in America.

(05-07-2018 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

That may be the dumbest, most ignorant post I've seen on the entire board in a very long time.

Really? It's only Tuesday. Give Mach the rest of the week especially once the Friday night booze starts to flow. I'm sure something better will be posted.

Mach is playing the Troll role. It is all he has left.

(05-06-2018 06:15 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The grapes are more sour than ever.

Yea,
This is getting more embarrassing by the hour.

Maybe minute... sheeeeesh.

(05-07-2018 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

That may be the dumbest, most ignorant post I've seen on the entire board in a very long time.

(05-08-2018 08:29 AM)gdunn Wrote:  If you'll remember first off it was the claim was the voting machines were hacked. Then when it was exposed that they are not hooked up to the internet they moved to the next theory.

You must not have seen the Senate Intel report yet. We all should be outraged and this one was the unclassified one!

(05-09-2018 04:45 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

That may be the dumbest, most ignorant post I've seen on the entire board in a very long time.

(05-08-2018 08:29 AM)gdunn Wrote:  If you'll remember first off it was the claim was the voting machines were hacked. Then when it was exposed that they are not hooked up to the internet they moved to the next theory.

You must not have seen the Senate Intel report yet. We all should be outraged and this one was the unclassified one!

Just read it. Still not the voting machines.

(05-09-2018 04:45 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

That may be the dumbest, most ignorant post I've seen on the entire board in a very long time.

(05-08-2018 08:29 AM)gdunn Wrote:  If you'll remember first off it was the claim was the voting machines were hacked. Then when it was exposed that they are not hooked up to the internet they moved to the next theory.

You must not have seen the Senate Intel report yet. We all should be outraged and this one was the unclassified one!

What should we be outraged about?

In an environment where "the Russians" were actively trying to hack us,
1) That Hillary stored classified material on non-secure servers?
Or 2) that somebody stupid enough to surrender his password to a cheap phishing gambit could have been in a position of great power had Hillary won?
Or 3) that the DNC failed to take adequate precautions to secure its servers?

Yes, I'm outraged by those things. What about you?

(05-06-2018 05:02 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  A popular tweet making the rounds today is...
Benghazi - 4 years, Zero indictments
Hillary emails - 2 years, Zero indictments
Trump Russia - 14 months, 23 indictments

Although that's not going to make anyone change their mind on either side.

In other words, Democrats refuse to indict criminals in their ranks. Republicans have less objections.

Should never be a Democrat in the White House again since they think the law doesn't apply to them.

(05-06-2018 09:16 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

So who are the Russians going to back in the midterms?

Now they are financing the "resistance." Their puppets are people like Machiavelli.

(05-09-2018 07:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-09-2018 04:45 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 07:51 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(05-06-2018 08:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  People puhleaze. Trump would not be President without the Russian psyop.

That may be the dumbest, most ignorant post I've seen on the entire board in a very long time.

(05-08-2018 08:29 AM)gdunn Wrote:  If you'll remember first off it was the claim was the voting machines were hacked. Then when it was exposed that they are not hooked up to the internet they moved to the next theory.

You must not have seen the Senate Intel report yet. We all should be outraged and this one was the unclassified one!

What should we be outraged about?

In an environment where "the Russians" were actively trying to hack us,
1) That Hillary stored classified material on non-secure servers?
Or 2) that somebody stupid enough to surrender his password to a cheap phishing gambit could have been in a position of great power had Hillary won?
Or 3) that the DNC failed to take adequate precautions to secure its servers?

Yes, I'm outraged by those things. What about you?

^^^THIS^^^

And I'll add, if less than $1million spent on CHEESY Facebook Ads can change the outcome of an election, then why bother to spend over $500million on conventional campaign advertising?

(05-08-2018 08:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 10:37 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 10:15 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It had everything to do with Russia.

See, I told you guys he wouldn't disavow the comment. He believes it, and will believe it until the day he dies, no matter what all the evidence in the world might show to the contrary.

But that's at least in part because he finds the alternative--that Americans actually voted against Hillary because they did not like her--to be unbelievable.

I still find it hard that people actually liked Hillary. I can't imagine anyone with a brain wanting her to be president except as a lesser of two evils.

Below is an example of an alleged Russian Facebook ad. Does anyone really think this would change one vote in the 2016 election? REALLY? I guess if 6 year olds can vote.