(05-01-2018 01:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  And that only pertains to "declared or disclosed" sites and facilities. Not the secret hidden ones.

Which are where?

You guys live in a world of fantasy. My God.

(05-01-2018 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 01:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  And that only pertains to "declared or disclosed" sites and facilities. Not the secret hidden ones.

Which are where?

You guys live in a world of fantasy. My God.

Can't speak to the content of anything else, but isn't the very definition of 'secret hidden ones' that we don't know where they are? You realize that we currently have subs at sea and of course, missile silos that are similarly secret and hidden, even from us. Iran and Iraq had scud (portable) missile launchers that we had trouble finding and eliminating, despite deploying all of our resources towards that goal.... and of course we couldn't find Bin Laden or the Afghani's for years in their caves.

They may well not exist... but how would we know? The entire region has a long history of effectively avoiding detection.

(05-01-2018 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 01:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  And that only pertains to "declared or disclosed" sites and facilities. Not the secret hidden ones.

Which are where?

You guys live in a world of fantasy. My God.

Jesus you are blind. You think think the bogus Iran deal is good because your stupid team did the deal.

(05-01-2018 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 09:31 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

If that was all known, then what is this farce that Iran is in compliance? If all that Bibi said is true, then Iran is not in compliance with the deal. Simple as that. Seems that pretty much explains why Trump has reservations about continuing to sign off on the failed deal.

This was known in 2015. The deal was signed in 2015. Since this stuff was all known, it can be monitored, and is. Just ask Mad Dog and the international agency tasked with the monitoring.

lol. Your saying Iran is no longer advancing any nuclear weapons technology under any known or unknown name? Got it. Here's just one quick issue for you to explain---the records that were stolen were supposed to be destroyed. Its very safe in your imaginary bubble of protection. Im sure your insurance costs also dropped by $2,500 a year in that bubble.

(05-01-2018 02:40 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 01:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  And that only pertains to "declared or disclosed" sites and facilities. Not the secret hidden ones.

Which are where?

You guys live in a world of fantasy. My God.

Can't speak to the content of anything else, but isn't the very definition of 'secret hidden ones' that we don't know where they are? You realize that we currently have subs at sea and of course, missile silos that are similarly secret and hidden, even from us. Iran and Iraq had scud (portable) missile launchers that we had trouble finding and eliminating, despite deploying all of our resources towards that goal.... and of course we couldn't find Bin Laden or the Afghani's for years in their caves.

They may well not exist... but how would we know? The entire region has a long history of effectively avoiding detection.

And trump colluded with Russia. I know he did. It just happened in a secret hidden place.

Get it?

(05-01-2018 02:49 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 01:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  And that only pertains to "declared or disclosed" sites and facilities. Not the secret hidden ones.

Which are where?

You guys live in a world of fantasy. My God.

Jesus you are blind. You think think the bogus Iran deal is good because your stupid team did the deal.

Again, I don't have a team and I think it's a good deal because most all experts and people like Mad Dog think it is.

You think it isn't because you believe there is some secret hidden facility making nukes that no one knows about.

Come out of the clouds my good man...you're missing a nice day. Geesh.

If we were going to do the Iran deal, why didn't we negotiate some term favorable to us somewhere? It's a one-sided deal. Basically we released the cash that they have used to fund expanded terrorism, in return for toothless restrictions on their ability to go nuke. They can go nuke any time they want to, and our remedy is to try to reinvoke sanctions. WTF did we get out of the deal--except a piece of paper that we can show off to say, "What a good boy am I"?

(05-01-2018 03:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And trump colluded with Russia. I know he did. It just happened in a secret hidden place.

Get it?

I get what you're saying.... it's just ridiculous.

Trump was elected fair and square unless and until you prove that he didn't. You can't merely overturn the will of the American people because you don't want to believe it.

Iran isn't entitled to do business with the US. We're free to decide that we simply don't like the way they do business and boycott them.

Said differently, Trump gets due process... innocent until proven guilty. Iran isn't guaranteed that.

Get it?

(05-01-2018 09:45 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(05-01-2018 03:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And trump colluded with Russia. I know he did. It just happened in a secret hidden place.

Get it?

Trump was elected fair and square unless and until you prove that he didn't. You can't merely overturn the will of the American people because you don't want to believe it.

Trump gets due process... innocent until proven guilty.

Get it?

I said nothing to the contrary. My point was that just spouting off some conspiracy theory with no facts in rebuttal to factual information is ridiculous.