Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Poll: Will the Big Northern be announced by July?
This poll is closed.
Yes 15.00% 12 15.00%
No 85.00% 68 85.00%
Total 80 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Closed 
The Great Northern Conference
Author Message
johnbragg Offline
Five Minute Google Expert
*

Posts: 16,430
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 1012
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
Post: #261
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-25-2018 08:43 PM)MissouriStateBears Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 08:19 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 06:05 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 04:52 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  Tangentially related, but to anyone who knows: How few schools can play a sport under a conference banner for the conference to be considered a sponsor?

ACtually, I don't see anything at all about that in the bylaws. TEchnically, maybe the Summit-without-School-X could solve it's baseball-and-soccer problem by solving either baseball or soccer, and striking a deal with Hockey East or something.

EDIT: I was pretty sure that when the Big EASt split, the new Big East and the AAC had a deal to let each other's teams play as associates in sports where there weren't enough teams for two leagues.

Big East Women's Field Hockey has 3 full members and 5 affiliates.
Georgetown, Providence, Villanova, plus UConn, Temple, ODU, Quinnipiac and Liberty.

Of course, the Big EAst doesn't need Women's Field Hockey to qualify as a conference, so it's possible that there's a rule I missed that says 4 full members and nobody bothered to care that Big East women's Field Hockey is out of compliance.

But it's also possible that there is *no* minimum number of full members for a conference to sponsor a sport.

EDIT AGAIN: The Southland Bowling League is run out of the Southland Conference HQ, and has only 2 Southland teams. So 3 may be the lower limit.

Just found MAC mens' swimming and diving: 2 MAC teams.
Miami of Ohio, Ball State, Evansville, Missouri State, Southern Illinois

Eastern Michigan has men's swimming.

Thanks. I can't be too mad at wikipedia, though.
05-25-2018 08:47 PM
Find all posts by this user
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #262
RE: The Great Northern Conference
From the DI Bylaws:

Quote:20.02.5.1 Minimum Number of Members.
A multisport conference shall be composed of at least seven active Division I members. The member conference shall include at least seven active Division I members that sponsor both men's and women's basketball. (Adopted: 1/15/11 effective 8/1/11)

20.02.5.2 Sports Sponsorship.
A multisport conference shall satisfy the following requirements: (Adopted: 1/15/11 effective 8/1/11)

( a ) The conference shall sponsor a minimum of 12 Division I sports;

( b ) The conference shall sponsor a minimum of six men's sports, one of which shall be men's basketball. In addition to men's basketball, the conference shall sponsor football or two other men's team sports. A minimum of seven members shall sponsor men's basketball. A minimum of six members shall sponsor five other sports, including football or two additional men's team sports; and

( c ) The conference shall sponsor a minimum of six women's sports, one of which shall be women's basketball. In addition to women's basketball, the conference shall sponsor two other women's team sports. A minimum of seven members shall sponsor women's basketball. A minimum of six members shall sponsor five other sports, including two additional women's team sports (or a minimum of five members for an emerging sport for women).

And later:

Quote:20.02.6 Football Bowl Subdivision Conference.
A conference classified as a Football Bowl Subdivision conference shall be comprised of at least eight full Football Bowl Subdivision members that satisfy all bowl subdivision requirements. An institution shall be included as one of the eight full Football Bowl Subdivision members only if the institution participates in the conference schedule in at least six men's and eight women's conference-sponsored sports, including men's basketball and football and three women's team sports including women's basketball. A conference-sponsored sport shall be a sport in which regular-season and/or championship opportunities are provided, consistent with the minimum standards identified by the applicable NCAA sport committee for automatic qualification. (Adopted: 10/31/02 effective 8/1/05, Revised: 12/15/06)

Looks like football is the only sport in which the members are specifically required to sponsor other sports in the same conference, and then only in the FBS. For FCS football and other sports, there doesn't seem to be a minimum requirement for "full" members, probably because defining them is sticky.
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2018 08:56 PM by Nerdlinger.)
05-25-2018 08:54 PM
Find all posts by this user
Gamecock Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,979
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 182
I Root For: South Carolina
Location:
Post: #263
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-25-2018 04:46 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 03:18 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  How few schools can play a sport under a conference banner for the conference to be considered a sponsor?

8 full members for FBS, 7 for basketball, 6 members for FCS and other sports; for the last two categories you can use affiliates if you have at least four full members.

The SEC sponsors equestrian as a conference sport with only four members (SC, Auburn, UGA, A&M)
05-25-2018 09:07 PM
Find all posts by this user
jdgaucho Online
All American
*

Posts: 4,285
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 115
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #264
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-25-2018 09:07 PM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 04:46 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 03:18 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  How few schools can play a sport under a conference banner for the conference to be considered a sponsor?

8 full members for FBS, 7 for basketball, 6 members for FCS and other sports; for the last two categories you can use affiliates if you have at least four full members.

The SEC sponsors equestrian as a conference sport with only four members (SC, Auburn, UGA, A&M)

Equestrian is not an NCAA sanctioned sport. Not enough schools have it.
05-25-2018 10:15 PM
Find all posts by this user
Gamecock Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,979
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 182
I Root For: South Carolina
Location:
Post: #265
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-25-2018 10:15 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 09:07 PM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 04:46 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 03:18 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  How few schools can play a sport under a conference banner for the conference to be considered a sponsor?

8 full members for FBS, 7 for basketball, 6 members for FCS and other sports; for the last two categories you can use affiliates if you have at least four full members.

The SEC sponsors equestrian as a conference sport with only four members (SC, Auburn, UGA, A&M)

Equestrian is not an NCAA sanctioned sport. Not enough schools have it.

Yes, but it can still be sponsored at the conference level with four teams. I remember that being made a big deal when A&M was added
05-26-2018 05:44 AM
Find all posts by this user
Stugray2 Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,239
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 686
I Root For: tOSU SJSU Stan'
Location: South Bay Area CA
Post: #266
RE: The Great Northern Conference
So NoDak's conference needs 7 schools to move up together with invites from the WAC, joining NMSU to be a FBS conference in good standing (per 20.02.6).

But first this 7 need to come together in a conference, with an announcement by July 1st.
05-26-2018 05:47 AM
Find all posts by this user
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #267
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-26-2018 05:47 AM)Stugray2 Wrote:  So NoDak's conference needs 7 schools to move up together with invites from the WAC, joining NMSU to be a FBS conference in good standing (per 20.02.6).

But first this 7 need to come together in a conference, with an announcement by July 1st.

OK, but you seem to be describing only a route for the WAC to go FBS. The Summit/Great Northern is supposed to be a separate FBS conference. I'm guessing for the next step, the Summit and Big Sky schools that joined the WAC to go FBS (the Dakotas, Montanas, Idaho, and Weber State, I believe) break off to form the GNC, after which the WAC restocks to look like NoDak's "vision" here: https://csnbbs.com/post-15267077.html#pid15267077

However, he's saying that the Summit/GNC is merely in "close association" with the WAC, suggesting that the final 8 GNC members wouldn't actually have joined the WAC at any point. I don't know how that's supposed to work.

Here is my best guess at all the unfounded western DI moves that NoDak believes are in the works. (There may be more!)

For 2020 (announced by July 1, 2018)
Montana (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Montana State (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Idaho (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Weber State (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
North Dakota (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
North Dakota State (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
South Dakota (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
South Dakota State (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
Fort Wayne (NFB) from Summit to ??? [for some reason]
Western Illinois (NFB) from Summit to ??? [for some reason]
Oral Roberts (NFB) from Summit to WAC [for some reason]
UTRGV (FB) from [no program] to FCS Ind?

For later (announced by June/July 1, 2020?)
Summit/GNC goes FBS
WAC goes FBS
Utah Valley (NFB) from WAC to Big Sky [for some reason]
Seattle (NFB) from WAC to Big Sky [for some reason]
Central Washington (full) from DII GNAC to Big Sky
Azusa Pacific (full) from DII GNAC/PacWest to Big Sky
Dixie State (full) from DII RMAC to Big Sky
Cal Poly (full) from Big Sky/Big West to WAC
UC Davis (full) from Big Sky/Big West to WAC
Sacramento State (full) from Big Sky to WAC
New Mexico State (FB) from FBS Ind to WAC
UTRGV (FB) from FCS Ind? to WAC
Missouri State (FB) from MVFC to WAC
Chicago State (NFB) from WAC to ??? [for some reason]
Lamar (full) from Southland to WAC
Sam Houston (full) from Southland to WAC
* also, some combination of:
Stephen F. Austin (full) from Southland to WAC
Incarnate Word (full) from Southland to WAC
Wichita State (FB) from [no program] to WAC

Thus you eventually would have:

Summit/GNC (FBS)
FB: Idaho, Montana, Montana State, North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State, Weber State
NFB: Denver, Omaha

WAC (FBS)
FB: Cal Poly, Lamar, Missouri State (FB-only), New Mexico State, Sacramento State, Sam Houston, UC Davis, UTRGV, [either or both of Incarnate Word, Stephen F. Austin; maybe also Wichita State (FB-only)]
NFB: Cal Baptist, Grand Canyon, Oral Roberts, UMKC

Big Sky (FCS)
FB: Azusa Pacific, Central Washington, Dixie State, Eastern Washington, Idaho State, Northern Arizona, Northern Colorado, Portland State, Southern Utah
NFB: Seattle, Utah Valley
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2018 09:40 AM by Nerdlinger.)
05-26-2018 09:30 AM
Find all posts by this user
Lopes87 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,582
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 40
I Root For: GCU
Location:
Post: #268
RE: The Great Northern Conference
But where do GCU and CBU end up in all of this? they weren't mentioned once.
05-26-2018 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #269
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-26-2018 09:37 AM)Lopes87 Wrote:  But where do GCU and CBU end up in all of this? they weren't mentioned once.

Look again. That's actually one thing you can't hold against the NoDakster.
05-26-2018 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #270
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-25-2018 09:07 PM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 04:46 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(05-25-2018 03:18 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  How few schools can play a sport under a conference banner for the conference to be considered a sponsor?

8 full members for FBS, 7 for basketball, 6 members for FCS and other sports; for the last two categories you can use affiliates if you have at least four full members.

The SEC sponsors equestrian as a conference sport with only four members (SC, Auburn, UGA, A&M)

The PAC 12 sponsors wrestling with only 3 PAC schools having the sport: Stanford, Oregon St and Arizona St. Affiliate Boise St dropped wrestling last year and Fresno St added it.
*Cal Poly and I think Bakersfield are affiliates. Is Fresno St in the Big 12 with the other MWC wrestling schools Wyoming and Air Force?
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2018 11:35 AM by billybobby777.)
05-26-2018 11:32 AM
Find all posts by this user
billings Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,340
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Wyo / Mont St.
Location: Billings, Montana
Post: #271
The Great Northern Conference
had a cup of coffee with a person who works in montana st athletic dept. he blew coffee out his nose laughing about a great northern conference. he said while some membership changes may be being talked about in the big sky msu has zero interest in being in a midwestern based league and they must maintain a presence in the northwest and in cali.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2018 12:00 PM by billings.)
05-26-2018 11:58 AM
Find all posts by this user
Lopes87 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,582
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 40
I Root For: GCU
Location:
Post: #272
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-26-2018 09:51 AM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(05-26-2018 09:37 AM)Lopes87 Wrote:  But where do GCU and CBU end up in all of this? they weren't mentioned once.

Look again. That's actually one thing you can't hold against the NoDakster.

Skimmed right by that.
05-26-2018 04:49 PM
Find all posts by this user
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,105
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 848
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #273
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-26-2018 09:30 AM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(05-26-2018 05:47 AM)Stugray2 Wrote:  So NoDak's conference needs 7 schools to move up together with invites from the WAC, joining NMSU to be a FBS conference in good standing (per 20.02.6).

But first this 7 need to come together in a conference, with an announcement by July 1st.

OK, but you seem to be describing only a route for the WAC to go FBS. The Summit/Great Northern is supposed to be a separate FBS conference. I'm guessing for the next step, the Summit and Big Sky schools that joined the WAC to go FBS (the Dakotas, Montanas, Idaho, and Weber State, I believe) break off to form the GNC, after which the WAC restocks to look like NoDak's "vision" here: https://csnbbs.com/post-15267077.html#pid15267077

However, he's saying that the Summit/GNC is merely in "close association" with the WAC, suggesting that the final 8 GNC members wouldn't actually have joined the WAC at any point. I don't know how that's supposed to work.

Here is my best guess at all the unfounded western DI moves that NoDak believes are in the works. (There may be more!)

For 2020 (announced by July 1, 2018)
Montana (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Montana State (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Idaho (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
Weber State (full) from Big Sky to Summit/GNC
North Dakota (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
North Dakota State (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
South Dakota (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
South Dakota State (FB) from MVFC to Summit/GNC
Fort Wayne (NFB) from Summit to ??? [for some reason]
Western Illinois (NFB) from Summit to ??? [for some reason]
Oral Roberts (NFB) from Summit to WAC [for some reason]
UTRGV (FB) from [no program] to FCS Ind?

For later (announced by June/July 1, 2020?)
Summit/GNC goes FBS
WAC goes FBS
Utah Valley (NFB) from WAC to Big Sky [for some reason]
Seattle (NFB) from WAC to Big Sky [for some reason]
Central Washington (full) from DII GNAC to Big Sky
Azusa Pacific (full) from DII GNAC/PacWest to Big Sky
Dixie State (full) from DII RMAC to Big Sky
Cal Poly (full) from Big Sky/Big West to WAC
UC Davis (full) from Big Sky/Big West to WAC
Sacramento State (full) from Big Sky to WAC
New Mexico State (FB) from FBS Ind to WAC
UTRGV (FB) from FCS Ind? to WAC
Missouri State (FB) from MVFC to WAC
Chicago State (NFB) from WAC to ??? [for some reason]
Lamar (full) from Southland to WAC
Sam Houston (full) from Southland to WAC
* also, some combination of:
Stephen F. Austin (full) from Southland to WAC
Incarnate Word (full) from Southland to WAC
Wichita State (FB) from [no program] to WAC

Thus you eventually would have:

Summit/GNC (FBS)
FB: Idaho, Montana, Montana State, North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State, Weber State
NFB: Denver, Omaha

WAC (FBS)
FB: Cal Poly, Lamar, Missouri State (FB-only), New Mexico State, Sacramento State, Sam Houston, UC Davis, UTRGV, [either or both of Incarnate Word, Stephen F. Austin; maybe also Wichita State (FB-only)]
NFB: Cal Baptist, Grand Canyon, Oral Roberts, UMKC

Big Sky (FCS)
FB: Azusa Pacific, Central Washington, Dixie State, Eastern Washington, Idaho State, Northern Arizona, Northern Colorado, Portland State, Southern Utah
NFB: Seattle, Utah Valley

Tarleton State could go to Southland then, but they could upgrade first to be part of MAC, and then they can switch conference after they transition. I have not seen any rules that a D2 school had to go to FCS first before joining an FBS conference. The only rule said that you have to be a D2 school for 8 years to move to D1. Does not say anything about football. West Texas A&M could fit the future WAC FBs school since they already won conference championships in football in the Border and MVC which they beat Texas Texas Tech, UTEP, Arizona, Arizona State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, Wichita State, North Texas, Memphis and so forth. They even beat Cincinnati for football title in MVC.

That leaves only Western oregon, Simon Fraser and Humboldt State at d2 GNAC with football. I do think Big West may take Humboldt State and Azusa Pacific along with Cal. Baptist for replacements. That could bring Western Oregon into Big Sky as a travel partner for Portland State.
05-26-2018 06:35 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,932
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 818
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #274
RE: The Great Northern Conference
If Idaho, Montana, Montana St, Sacramento St, Cal Poly, and UC Davis are all seeking FBS wouldn't it make more sense for them to all join the WAC rather than involve the Dakota schools in full membership? The Dakota schools could stay in the Summit and just be WAC fb affiliates.
05-27-2018 07:26 AM
Find all posts by this user
johnbragg Offline
Five Minute Google Expert
*

Posts: 16,430
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 1012
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
Post: #275
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-27-2018 07:26 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  If Idaho, Montana, Montana St, Sacramento St, Cal Poly, and UC Davis are all seeking FBS wouldn't it make more sense for them to all join the WAC rather than involve the Dakota schools in full membership? The Dakota schools could stay in the Summit and just be WAC fb affiliates.

If the standard is "wouldn't it make more sense" then almost none of this stands up.

It only hangs together to the extent that it does if you assume (with minimal to no evidence) that the Dakota 4 and the Montanas have a desperate, unrequited desire to be in an FBS conference together; a love so powerful that it bends time and space and creates exceptions in the NCAA rulebook.
(This post was last modified: 05-27-2018 07:38 AM by johnbragg.)
05-27-2018 07:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #276
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-27-2018 07:37 AM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(05-27-2018 07:26 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  If Idaho, Montana, Montana St, Sacramento St, Cal Poly, and UC Davis are all seeking FBS wouldn't it make more sense for them to all join the WAC rather than involve the Dakota schools in full membership? The Dakota schools could stay in the Summit and just be WAC fb affiliates.

If the standard is "wouldn't it make more sense" then almost none of this stands up.

It only hangs together to the extent that it does if you assume (with minimal to no evidence) that the Dakota 4 and the Montanas have a desperate, unrequited desire to be in an FBS conference together; a love so powerful that it bends time and space and creates exceptions in the NCAA rulebook.

None of us have experienced the rulebook as... intimately as NoDak has. His thorough knowledge of it has let him read "between its lines" and learn the secret rules it can tell no one else.
05-27-2018 08:51 AM
Find all posts by this user
wisent94 Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 22
Joined: May 2018
Reputation: 0
I Root For: NDSU
Location:
Post: #277
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-27-2018 07:26 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  If Idaho, Montana, Montana St, Sacramento St, Cal Poly, and UC Davis are all seeking FBS wouldn't it make more sense for them to all join the WAC rather than involve the Dakota schools in full membership? The Dakota schools could stay in the Summit and just be WAC fb affiliates.

But then UND's move to the Summit League would make no sense. NoDak can't allow that. The whole point of his fantasies is to prove UND's superiority to its rivals. UND can't possibly have moved to the lowly "Slummit" just to save money on travel, or to schedule its traditional rivals. There simply must be more to it than that. A complex plan to move to FBS with UND at the very center provides the "more" he's looking for.
(This post was last modified: 05-27-2018 11:49 AM by wisent94.)
05-27-2018 11:21 AM
Find all posts by this user
Stugray2 Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,239
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 686
I Root For: tOSU SJSU Stan'
Location: South Bay Area CA
Post: #278
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-26-2018 09:30 AM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(05-26-2018 05:47 AM)Stugray2 Wrote:  So NoDak's conference needs 7 schools to move up together with invites from the WAC, joining NMSU to be a FBS conference in good standing (per 20.02.6).

But first this 7 need to come together in a conference, with an announcement by July 1st.

OK, but you seem to be describing only a route for the WAC to go FBS. The Summit/Great Northern is supposed to be a separate FBS conference. I'm guessing for the next step, the Summit and Big Sky schools that joined the WAC to go FBS (the Dakotas, Montanas, Idaho, and Weber State, I believe) break off to form the GNC, after which the WAC restocks to look like NoDak's "vision" here: https://csnbbs.com/post-15267077.html#pid15267077

However, he's saying that the Summit/GNC is merely in "close association" with the WAC, suggesting that the final 8 GNC members wouldn't actually have joined the WAC at any point. I don't know how that's supposed to work.

... (silly lists follows of no value)

Nerdlinger,

Without the WAC the Great North cannot move up to FBS because they will have no FBS conference sponsorship. The only path in the rules, without a waiver to be an Independent like Liberty attained, is to have an invite from an existing FBS conference ... or a former FBS conference - a concession to allow the WAC to reform back in 2012 when they were trying to do that. So the only way to move up as a group is with WAC full member invites (more specific rules, but at least 6 of the 7 have to be full members, the last one could be like Navy or Hawaii, a Football only member - this has to do woith multisport FBS classification for the WAC).

If they do not join the WAC then each will have to either get a waiver like Liberty to play as an FBS Independent for a number of years; how many depends on what the exact agreement state. We don't know the details of the waiver agreement Liberty and the NCAA settled on, but you can bet it included Liberty committing to multiple years as an independent and they demonstrated the financial backing to support that. Obviously going the route would effectively separate all these schools, who would effectively be in nothing more than a scheduling agreement. What's more each would have to individually demonstrate the ability to fund an Independent run.

The other non-WAC path open would be for each school to get an invite from an existing FBS conference. But there is no indication of any interest from any G5 conference in any of these schools. And again each would be on their own and not the Great North. And the reason for the Great North is the belief (by NoDak) that these schools all want to be FBS and are blocked by the G5.

When you go through the mechanics, the only strategy that could work is for the WAC to invite 7 schools, at least 6 as full members.
05-27-2018 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,932
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 818
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #279
RE: The Great Northern Conference
The WAC is the best conference to build a new FBS league which is why the Great Northern doesn't make sense. Plus UND and USD are a ways away from FBS ready.

Take the 8 WAC schools, drop Chicago St, add those 6 that I mentioned earlier and that gets you 13.

In the process you could parse out some of the existing WAC schools to other leagues impacted in the moves. UMKC goes to the Summit in exchange for FB affiliate status for the XDSUs
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2018 08:57 AM by Fighting Muskie.)
05-27-2018 02:21 PM
Find all posts by this user
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,918
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #280
RE: The Great Northern Conference
(05-27-2018 01:14 PM)Stugray2 Wrote:  
(05-26-2018 09:30 AM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  
(05-26-2018 05:47 AM)Stugray2 Wrote:  So NoDak's conference needs 7 schools to move up together with invites from the WAC, joining NMSU to be a FBS conference in good standing (per 20.02.6).

But first this 7 need to come together in a conference, with an announcement by July 1st.

OK, but you seem to be describing only a route for the WAC to go FBS. The Summit/Great Northern is supposed to be a separate FBS conference. I'm guessing for the next step, the Summit and Big Sky schools that joined the WAC to go FBS (the Dakotas, Montanas, Idaho, and Weber State, I believe) break off to form the GNC, after which the WAC restocks to look like NoDak's "vision" here: https://csnbbs.com/post-15267077.html#pid15267077

However, he's saying that the Summit/GNC is merely in "close association" with the WAC, suggesting that the final 8 GNC members wouldn't actually have joined the WAC at any point. I don't know how that's supposed to work.

... (super awesome list follows of amazing value)

Nerdlinger,

Without the WAC the Great North cannot move up to FBS because they will have no FBS conference sponsorship. The only path in the rules, without a waiver to be an Independent like Liberty attained, is to have an invite from an existing FBS conference ... or a former FBS conference - a concession to allow the WAC to reform back in 2012 when they were trying to do that. So the only way to move up as a group is with WAC full member invites (more specific rules, but at least 6 of the 7 have to be full members, the last one could be like Navy or Hawaii, a Football only member - this has to do woith multisport FBS classification for the WAC).

If they do not join the WAC then each will have to either get a waiver like Liberty to play as an FBS Independent for a number of years; how many depends on what the exact agreement state. We don't know the details of the waiver agreement Liberty and the NCAA settled on, but you can bet it included Liberty committing to multiple years as an independent and they demonstrated the financial backing to support that. Obviously going the route would effectively separate all these schools, who would effectively be in nothing more than a scheduling agreement. What's more each would have to individually demonstrate the ability to fund an Independent run.

The other non-WAC path open would be for each school to get an invite from an existing FBS conference. But there is no indication of any interest from any G5 conference in any of these schools. And again each would be on their own and not the Great North. And the reason for the Great North is the belief (by NoDak) that these schools all want to be FBS and are blocked by the G5.

When you go through the mechanics, the only strategy that could work is for the WAC to invite 7 schools, at least 6 as full members.

OK, but it sounds like you're going against the express word of NoDak -- heresy!

For 2020 (announced by July 1, 2018)
WAC goes FBS
Idaho, Montana, Montana State, Weber State from Big Sky to WAC
North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State from MVFC/Summit to WAC
New Mexico State (FB) from FBS Ind to WAC
UTRGV (FB) from [no program] to FCS Ind

At this point, FBS WAC perhaps looks like:

FB: Idaho, Montana, Montana State, New Mexico State, North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State, Weber State
NFB: Cal Baptist, Chicago State, Grand Canyon, UMKC, Utah Valley, UTRGV, Seattle

Not sure what happens to the Summit in the interim, as all they have left are Denver, Fort Wayne, Omaha, ORU, and WIU. Denver and Omaha are supposed to ultimately end up in the GNC, and ORU in the WAC, but the WAC by now is already full up with 16 members. The Summit needs at least 2 more basketball schools, plus possibly some other members/affiliates/new sport sponsors to fulfill other requirements. The MVFC is of course shorthanded too, but as a FB-only conference, they only need 6 members (they have 7 left). Although only WIU is in both conferences at this point, the remnant Summit and MVFC could combine their forces, giving the Summit an extra sport. However, this doesn't really help the MVFC schools, and such a merged conference is likely doomed anyway (at least as a multisport conference) when Denver, Omaha, and ORU leave.

For later (announced by June/July 1, 2020?)
Great Northern forms as new FBS conference
Idaho, Montana, Montana State, North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State, Weber State from WAC to Great Northern
Denver (NFB), Omaha (NFB) from Summit? to Great Northern
Oral Roberts (NFB) from Summit? to WAC
Cal Poly, UC Davis from Big Sky/Big West to WAC
Sacramento State from Big Sky to WAC
Missouri State (FB) from MVFC to WAC
Utah Valley (NFB), Seattle (NFB) from WAC to Big Sky [I don't know what advantage there is in moving from WAC to Big Sky here]
Azusa Pacific from DII GNAC/PacWest to Big Sky
Central Washington from DII GNAC to Big Sky
Dixie State from DII RMAC to Big Sky
Chicago State (NFB) from WAC to ??? [maybe drop to DII?]
UTRGV (FB) from FCS Ind to WAC
Lamar, Sam Houston from Southland to WAC
* also, some combination of:
Incarnate Word, Stephen F. Austin from Southland to WAC
Wichita State (FB) from [no program] to WAC [presumably with an intermediate FCS Ind stint]

With the same result as before:

Great Northern (FBS)
FB: Idaho, Montana, Montana State, North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota, South Dakota State, Weber State
NFB: Denver, Omaha

WAC (FBS)
FB: Cal Poly, Lamar, Missouri State (FB-only), New Mexico State, Sacramento State, Sam Houston, UC Davis, UTRGV, [either or both of Incarnate Word, Stephen F. Austin; maybe also Wichita State (FB-only)]
NFB: Cal Baptist, Grand Canyon, Oral Roberts, UMKC

Big Sky (FCS)
FB: Azusa Pacific, Central Washington, Dixie State, Eastern Washington, Idaho State, Northern Arizona, Northern Colorado, Portland State, Southern Utah
NFB: Seattle, Utah Valley

It's fun trying to make sense of the madness.
(This post was last modified: 05-27-2018 05:31 PM by Nerdlinger.)
05-27-2018 02:25 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.