http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/20...lem-worse/

So, is it Facebook trying to be impartial or are they trying to still favor a certain political party? Either way, having access to additional articles with divergent viewpoints is a good addition IMHO.

Quote:Facebook is getting rid of its fake news red flags because they were making fabricated media reports appear more believable to its users.

The social network began showing "disputed" warnings next to articles in December to alert people that third party fact-checking websites deemed them misleading.

It will now show a selection of “related articles” next to offending stories instead. These will give more context and could help people learn the facts surrounding a situation through reputable media publications.

"Academic research on correcting misinformation has shown that putting a strong image, like a red flag, next to an article may actually entrench deeply held beliefs – the opposite effect to what we intended," Facebook product manager Tessa Lyons wrote in a blog-post.

It conducted research which suggested that false news stories with "related articles" next to it were shared fewer times than those highlighted with a red flag.

(12-22-2017 09:36 AM)miko33 Wrote:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/20...lem-worse/

So, is it Facebook trying to be impartial or are they trying to still favor a certain political party? Either way, having access to additional articles with divergent viewpoints is a good addition IMHO.

Quote:Facebook is getting rid of its fake news red flags because they were making fabricated media reports appear more believable to its users.

The social network began showing "disputed" warnings next to articles in December to alert people that third party fact-checking websites deemed them misleading.

It will now show a selection of “related articles” next to offending stories instead. These will give more context and could help people learn the facts surrounding a situation through reputable media publications.

"Academic research on correcting misinformation has shown that putting a strong image, like a red flag, next to an article may actually entrench deeply held beliefs – the opposite effect to what we intended," Facebook product manager Tessa Lyons wrote in a blog-post.

It conducted research which suggested that false news stories with "related articles" next to it were shared fewer times than those highlighted with a red flag.

They should just banned the people behind the fake news off their site. If I own a social network, one of the TOs would be no fake news can be posted unless it is a satire site that is more for laughs and sarcasm.

They should just banned the people behind the fake news off their site. If I own a social network, one of the TOs would be no fake news can be posted unless it is a satire site that is more for laughs and sarcasm.
[/quote]

Oh, like this one that you posted?


Post: #5RE: Top FBI Official Linked To Reporter Who Broke Trump Dossier Story

Fake news by the KKK.
(posted by Davidst.)

(12-23-2017 02:20 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  They should just banned the people behind the fake news off their site. If I own a social network, one of the TOs would be no fake news can be posted unless it is a satire site that is more for laughs and sarcasm.

Oh, like this one that you posted?


Post: #5RE: Top FBI Official Linked To Reporter Who Broke Trump Dossier Story

Fake news by the KKK.
(posted by Davidst.)
[/quote]

(12-22-2017 09:36 AM)miko33 Wrote:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/20...lem-worse/

So, is it Facebook trying to be impartial or are they trying to still favor a certain political party? Either way, having access to additional articles with divergent viewpoints is a good addition IMHO.

Quote:Facebook is getting rid of its fake news red flags because they were making fabricated media reports appear more believable to its users.

The social network began showing "disputed" warnings next to articles in December to alert people that third party fact-checking websites deemed them misleading.

It will now show a selection of “related articles” next to offending stories instead. These will give more context and could help people learn the facts surrounding a situation through reputable media publications.

"Academic research on correcting misinformation has shown that putting a strong image, like a red flag, next to an article may actually entrench deeply held beliefs – the opposite effect to what we intended," Facebook product manager Tessa Lyons wrote in a blog-post.

It conducted research which suggested that false news stories with "related articles" next to it were shared fewer times than those highlighted with a red flag.

Just trying to tilt scales to their side. They are not going to label any of the leftist stuff fake news.