(12-12-2017 10:27 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Ah yes, yet another loss is actually a win, you see?

It's only good news if you plan on spending 10x what you usually do (remember, you're broke) on every race, and think the amazon post will be able to dedicate 3 month's worth of fake news to framing every Republican in the country as a sexual predator.

Not to mention the fact that now the Republicans are going to file this one away in the playbook and certainly use this same tactic in the future. And if it's like every other time they have used a leftist dirty trick it'll work much, much better for them than it did for the dims.

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

"Dear Alabama" is trending, and it's the most toxic hashtag I have ever seen.

This tweet sums it up well.

Quote:For the last month, democrats from all over the country have called Alabama voters:

- hicks
- inbreds
- racists
- kkk
- rapists

But today it's, "Dear Alabama..."

LOL, alt-left twitter is calling for elite high school players to boycott Alabama and Auburn.

Good luck with that.

(12-12-2017 10:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  LOL, alt-left twitter is calling for elite high school players to boycott Alabama and Auburn.

Good luck with that.

Unhinged.

(12-12-2017 10:56 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Unhinged.

the irony of his surname isn't lost in translation....

(12-12-2017 10:56 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Unhinged.

Lol. That cuck boy. Bwahahahaha. Only thing he can destroy is a cheeseburger

(12-12-2017 10:33 AM)shere khan Wrote:  If Jones wins Alabama will see it as stolen election. A democrat won't win again for 50 years

I can see that

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

Doesn't matter how red Alabama is if you accuse the candidate of being a child molester, do it after its too late to remove him from ballot but but too late for due process and spend 10 million dollars before and election

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.
Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.
All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.
This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

I would say this is a loss for republicans, no matter who wins. But I wouldn't call Jones a moderate. The only issue where I know where he stands, he is no moderate. And his literature is full of meaningless platitudes, but those platitudes do suggest a hard left lean.

Given a choice between a republican they hate or a liberal democrat, republicans cannot be looking forward to the outcome. The real question is how were they stupid enough to et out get this far.

(12-12-2017 11:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.
Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.
All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.
This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

I would say this is a loss for republicans, no matter who wins. But I wouldn't call Jones a moderate. The only issue where I know where he stands, he is no moderate. And his literature is full of meaningless platitudes, but those platitudes do suggest a hard left lean.

Given a choice between a republican they hate or a liberal democrat, republicans cannot be looking forward to the outcome. The real question is how were they stupid enough to et out get this far.

I see it the very opposite

(12-12-2017 11:23 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

Doesn't matter how red Alabama is if you accuse the candidate of being a child molester, do it after its too late to remove him from ballot but but too late for due process and spend 10 million dollars before and election

it's scary sad how this one has been spun......

we'll find out shorty how this one plays out.....

Lets go Roy Moore!

(12-12-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:23 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

Doesn't matter how red Alabama is if you accuse the candidate of being a child molester, do it after its too late to remove him from ballot but but too late for due process and spend 10 million dollars before and election

it's scary sad how this one has been spun......

we'll find out shorty how this one plays out.....

Don't even get me started on the thousands of felons some fricker has been registering

So liberals plan to boycott Alabama??? Sign me up for vacations in Orange Beach for as long as the boycott lasts!

(12-12-2017 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:23 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

Doesn't matter how red Alabama is if you accuse the candidate of being a child molester, do it after its too late to remove him from ballot but but too late for due process and spend 10 million dollars before and election

it's scary sad how this one has been spun......

we'll find out shorty how this one plays out.....

Don't even get me started on the thousands of felons some fricker has been registering

it's not beyond the realm of plausibility those thousands may make a difference....

ref: see Frankengropergruber

+1 for Moore.

You’re welcome.

(12-12-2017 11:10 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:38 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:23 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  An Alabama senate race should not be a close contest. The fact that it is, is good news for Democrats. Roy Moore, if he wins, will become the 2nd most visible Republican in America.

Either way, this election is a big win for Democrats.

Considering the money spent, the accusations, the media pounding every day if the dems lose it will be the biggest loss in history for them. If Jones wins Alabamians will be pissed for 2 generations. Nobody is voting for no chin, nasally whiney boy Jones. They may vote against Moore.

All for less than half a term. The definition of phyrric victory.

seriously? By all accounts, Alabama is a very, very red state. You honestly believe a tightly contested loss in Alabama is the "biggest loss in history" for Democrats? In a normal year, a Democrat wouldn't come with 20 points of a Republican in the state. Quite honestly, its the other way around... a Republican loss in Alabama is a monumental loss for Republicans... though the seat would flip back in the next election for the seat.

This is reminiscent of the Scott Brown win in the Massachuesetts special election of 2010... a moderate candidate from the minority party up against a flawed candidate from the majority party.

You actually think Jones is a moderate?