(12-05-2017 01:41 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:26 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 08:30 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Man, these fake news organizations sure seem to care about not pushing fake news.

lol, only when they are busted and have no choice.

If they hadn't crashed the stock market and fear getting sued, they wouldn't have done anything to Ross. But they ticked a bunch of people off and cost a bunch of people money.

Exactly right. Even though they might follow the Libturd talking points they know how their bread is buttered.

I'd sue if I had a big stake in the stock market, but my steak (sic) is seven steak not rib eye.

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Anything in the DNC emails untrue? I get that they're embarrassing but untrue?

I wonder how many other reporter's hate Trump as much as Ross. What about Chuck Todd?

Tick tock

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Muh Logan Act



Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

How can Ross do his job if he is not allowed to cover the current President? He'll be let go soon.

edit......I'm not suggesting he was ever doing a good job anyways but the question still stands.

(12-05-2017 08:39 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I wonder how many other reporter's hate Trump as much as Ross. What about Chuck Todd?

Tick tock

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Most of them.

(12-05-2017 08:30 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Man, these fake news organizations sure seem to care about not pushing fake news.

Kinda like all these perverted congressmen and hollywood types seem to care about respecting women.

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

It's almost like ABC was feeling left out of the fake news cycle and said "Hey, we want to play too. We are just as much in the tank as the rest of cesspool."

(12-05-2017 07:46 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Anything in the DNC emails untrue? I get that they're embarrassing but untrue?

Irrelevant.

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Lol. All these assumptions. Yet—why so little interest in the Trump Dossier—purchased from a forieghn government by the DNC and filled with info supposedly gleaned from Russian operatives, if Russia was so interested in a Trump win, why the hell would they be feeding the DNC opo-research. And why in the hell is a honeypot Russian lawyer meeting with the DNC, then contacting the Trump campaign offering Hillary dirt, then immediately reporting back to the DNC after the meeting.

I’d actually welcome a deep FBI dive into Russian interference into the election, but given what we have found out about the liberal-centric left leaning politically co-opted deep state—it clear there was never any intention to look into Russian interference. it’s just a political which hunt staffed with Democrat donors and Trump haters. This country is in worse shape than I ever thought. I really thought the deep state was a load of crap. Looks like it ain’t.

(12-06-2017 12:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

Where did I ever say any law was violated?

(12-06-2017 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

Where did I ever say any law was violated?

exactly!

you think this investigation is actually about law's being broken?

witch hunts don't really care about laws being violated, they are to make people feel better

(12-06-2017 10:16 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

Where did I ever say any law was violated?

exactly!

you think this investigation is actually about law's being broken?

witch hunts don't really care about laws being violated, they are to make people feel better

Well, the investigation is likely far from over. And we've already had two people confess to crimes, with two more looking at a trial. Also, there is still the possibility of obstruction of justice crimes as well as Logan Act violations as well as other potential folks who lied to the FBI. There's also the possbility of criminal proceedings to any number of team trump folks who may have lied to Congress.

And there is also the possibility that no further crimes will be uncovered.

Stay tuned...

(12-06-2017 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 10:16 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

Where did I ever say any law was violated?

exactly!

you think this investigation is actually about law's being broken?

witch hunts don't really care about laws being violated, they are to make people feel better

Well, the investigation is likely far from over. And we've already had two people confess to crimes, with two more looking at a trial. Also, there is still the possibility of obstruction of justice crimes as well as Logan Act violations as well as other potential folks who lied to the FBI. There's also the possbility of criminal proceedings to any number of team trump folks who may have lied to Congress.

And there is also the possibility that no further crimes will be uncovered.

Stay tuned...

so you're in favor of prosecuting under a 200+ year old obscure law that has never been used before?

that doesn't scream political at all

(12-06-2017 10:16 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

please cite the law that was violated. seldom used logan act, lol. thats like saying the seldon used "you cant spit on the sidewalk during a full moon" law.

Where did I ever say any law was violated?

exactly!

you think this investigation is actually about law's being broken?

witch hunts don't really care about laws being violated, they are to make people feel better

This "investigation" is about one thing only, and that is impeachment. Pure partisan politics is all this is.

Stay tuned?

That must be sorta like Buckle Up!

I've been tuned in to this attempted coup from the beginning. Watching the establishment crumble under the weight of its own corruption is must see TV.

(12-06-2017 10:33 AM)appst89 Wrote:  Stay tuned?

That must be sorta like Buckle Up!

I've been tuned in to this attempted coup from the beginning. Watching the establishment crumble under the weight of its own corruption is must see TV.

Yep, just enjoy the show and wait for the "tax return" moment. It's gonna be must see TV.

(12-05-2017 11:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 10:19 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 10:18 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 01:31 AM)EagleX Wrote:  been asking this question forever. what does anyone think trump (or Flynn, for that matter) could have been "colluding" with the russians about?

And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Lol


Seldom used...

As in enacted in 1799 and perhaps used once.

The very idea that Trump is a softer touch on foreign policy(s) than an incompetent failure like “reset button” and James Taylor in succession is beyond laughable.

This is a fishing expedition and getting uglier by the minute. Probably just time to take the hit and either fire Bueller, or crank up a Sessions appointed IC to investigate the “investigator”.

Enough dog and pony already.

The FBI has already said the meetings were normal and harmless

Then. Why. Lie. About. Them?

not relevant. failure to understand why a guy lied doesn't create a new, underlying crime.

(12-06-2017 10:45 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 11:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 10:19 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 10:18 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 09:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And it's been answered forever as well. Do you just not like the answer?

Okay...not saying this happened. Again, not saying this happened. However, this is what the collusion COULD have been. And it could have happened both before and after the election.

Collusion before the election: Someone on team trump contacted the Russians who then stole DNC e-mails and then coordinated with Wikileaks to release them. Those e-mails were then released to weaken Hillary. Team trump would have been doing this to help win the election, while Russia would have been doing this to weaken Hillary should she win the election as most were expecting her to. And even in the event that trump did win, Russia would then have someone way more favorable to them than Hillary would have been...regarding sanctions on them which is hurting their economy. So a win-win for them. And no matter what the result, they also win because they were able to meddle in our election and expose the whole process to make us look weak as a country.

Collusion after the election: And this is where Flynn comes in. He had meetings with Kislyak where they discussed the Russia sanctions. And while just talking to Kislyak is not an issue, but discussing the sanctions and/or making deals while Obama was still president could run afoul of the seldom used Logan Act.

Now let's address the elephant in the room. Flynn, an experienced former General should be well aware of the severity of lying to the FBI. So why would he? If his meetings with Kislyak were normal and harmless, why lie about them?

Lol


Seldom used...

As in enacted in 1799 and perhaps used once.

The very idea that Trump is a softer touch on foreign policy(s) than an incompetent failure like “reset button” and James Taylor in succession is beyond laughable.

This is a fishing expedition and getting uglier by the minute. Probably just time to take the hit and either fire Bueller, or crank up a Sessions appointed IC to investigate the “investigator”.

Enough dog and pony already.

The FBI has already said the meetings were normal and harmless

Then. Why. Lie. About. Them?

not relevant. failure to understand why a guy lied doesn't create a new, underlying crime.

Sure. I know that whenever I lie, it's usually to cover up for something that I did that was wrong. But hey, I'm sure I'm alone in that regard.