(12-04-2017 09:07 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  You guys forget the #MeToo campaign just took off after Weinstein and more women are coming out speaking up. Another Republican can't keep his ding dong in his pants up in D.C.

Too bad your dad didn't take that advice.

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:59 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:56 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Evidence? We don't need no stinking evidence. The Trumpbots have already determined Moore's accusers are liars and Jones is a liar.
End of story.

At this point, I don't know who is lying and who is telling the truth. All I know is the somebody's lying.

Fortunately, I no longer live and vote in Alabama. I would hate to have this choice. And I would write in the libertarian if I did.

Roy Moore is an arrogant POS. No doubt that he’s a hypocrite and a pervert. Not convinced he’s guilty or innocent though. Up to Alabama on who they want. The Dem candidate is a lying POS too. Alabama candidates are putrid.

So one guy thinks your religion disqualifies you from serving in congress, has twice been removed for unconstitutional actions as a judge, and has incontrovertibly lied about his contact with teens accusing him of sexual assault when he was 30+ years old. What has Jones done that is even comparable?

Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:59 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:56 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Evidence? We don't need no stinking evidence. The Trumpbots have already determined Moore's accusers are liars and Jones is a liar.
End of story.

At this point, I don't know who is lying and who is telling the truth. All I know is the somebody's lying.

Fortunately, I no longer live and vote in Alabama. I would hate to have this choice. And I would write in the libertarian if I did.

Roy Moore is an arrogant POS. No doubt that he’s a hypocrite and a pervert. Not convinced he’s guilty or innocent though. Up to Alabama on who they want. The Dem candidate is a lying POS too. Alabama candidates are putrid.

So one guy thinks your religion disqualifies you from serving in congress, has twice been removed for unconstitutional actions as a judge, and has incontrovertibly lied about his contact with teens accusing him of sexual assault when he was 30+ years old. What has Jones done that is even comparable?

Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

It makes him look like a huge liar and a weasel. The national politburo....i mean DNC has cleaned him up and coached him but he looks like he is lying when he is telling the truth. He is Doug Rodham Jones.

Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

(12-04-2017 09:59 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:59 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  At this point, I don't know who is lying and who is telling the truth. All I know is the somebody's lying.

Fortunately, I no longer live and vote in Alabama. I would hate to have this choice. And I would write in the libertarian if I did.

Roy Moore is an arrogant POS. No doubt that he’s a hypocrite and a pervert. Not convinced he’s guilty or innocent though. Up to Alabama on who they want. The Dem candidate is a lying POS too. Alabama candidates are putrid.

So one guy thinks your religion disqualifies you from serving in congress, has twice been removed for unconstitutional actions as a judge, and has incontrovertibly lied about his contact with teens accusing him of sexual assault when he was 30+ years old. What has Jones done that is even comparable?

Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

I would despise Doug Jones if he was one of my choices for senator in my state for the reasons I just gave you. Killing someone via arsenic vs using a RPG still yields the same outcome.

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  [quote='UCF08' pid='14863654' dateline='1512441732']
[quote='miko33' pid='14863619' dateline='1512441085']
[quote='Owl 69/70/75' pid='14863501' dateline='1512439148']


Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

He didn't actually do that.

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:59 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:31 PM)miko33 Wrote:  Roy Moore is an arrogant POS. No doubt that he’s a hypocrite and a pervert. Not convinced he’s guilty or innocent though. Up to Alabama on who they want. The Dem candidate is a lying POS too. Alabama candidates are putrid.

So one guy thinks your religion disqualifies you from serving in congress, has twice been removed for unconstitutional actions as a judge, and has incontrovertibly lied about his contact with teens accusing him of sexual assault when he was 30+ years old. What has Jones done that is even comparable?

Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

I would despise Doug Jones if he was one of my choices for senator in my state for the reasons I just gave you. Killing someone via arsenic vs using a RPG still yields the same outcome.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Conyers isn't running for re-election so he'll be gone soon enough. That seems to be the way these things are playing out these days (Barton, Conyers). I imagine Franken won't run for re-election either although I forget what he was last elected.

(12-04-2017 11:11 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  [quote='UCF08' pid='14863654' dateline='1512441732']
[quote='miko33' pid='14863619' dateline='1512441085']
[quote='Owl 69/70/75' pid='14863501' dateline='1512439148']


Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

He didn't actually do that.

Technically, you're right he did not say that. However, you know that keeping the wording vague like this would lead the voter to infer from his statement that their individual vote would not be anonymous. IMHO, that's deceitful.

(12-05-2017 06:43 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Conyers isn't running for re-election so he'll be gone soon enough. That seems to be the way these things are playing out these days (Barton, Conyers). I imagine Franken won't run for re-election either although I forget what he was last elected.

He is up in 20’. By then his idiot constituents will have forgotten or explained away.

(12-04-2017 11:12 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:59 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So one guy thinks your religion disqualifies you from serving in congress, has twice been removed for unconstitutional actions as a judge, and has incontrovertibly lied about his contact with teens accusing him of sexual assault when he was 30+ years old. What has Jones done that is even comparable?

Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

I would despise Doug Jones if he was one of my choices for senator in my state for the reasons I just gave you. Killing someone via arsenic vs using a RPG still yields the same outcome.

Again, what has Jones done that is even comparable?

Irony alert...what about Moore? Regarding my views on Jones, Moore's behaviors or accusations against Moore are irrelevant. What Moore may or may not have done does not automatically excuse the fact that Jones (IMO) is intentionally deceiving voters on what he truly stands for and his implied statements about people "knowing" who you voted for.

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

(12-04-2017 09:53 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:52 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:49 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:59 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  You don’t see through this? The timing doesn’t make you wonder just a bit? God damned lemmings.

I've been noticing crap like this since the 2000 Presidential Election. That's why I take everything that comes out with a grain of salt.

this board has turned amazingly tard......

jones is toast.....the rest is mere rhetoric.....

I wish I could bet it.....I'd lay 1:10 in a second.....

I'm with Rath and others......

the biatches got nothing other than bs and biatches.....

this one is game, set, match.....

Couldn't have said it better myself.

I can't wait to see what kind of monkeys fly out of their arses when the midterm ads start running next year........

there's no question there will be a spike in demand for popcorn....

(12-05-2017 07:03 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

Conyere has announced he will resign.

(12-05-2017 08:17 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 07:03 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

Conyere has announced he will resign.

According to this report - not quite. However, if you have something more recent then that changes things. Not running for reelection is different than resigning immediately.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...921670001/

Quote:WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. John Conyers is expected to announce Tuesday that he will not seek re-election following allegations that he sexually harassed former members of his staff, the New York Times reports.

Ian Conyers, 29, the grandson of Conyers' brother, told the NYT that Conyers, 88, "is not resigning. He is going to retire.”

“His doctor advised him that the rigor of another campaign would be too much for him just in terms of his health," he said.

The younger Conyers told the NYT he planned to run for the seat.

(12-05-2017 08:23 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 08:17 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 07:03 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

Conyere has announced he will resign.

According to this report - not quite. However, if you have something more recent then that changes things. Not running for reelection is different than resigning immediately.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...921670001/

Quote:WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. John Conyers is expected to announce Tuesday that he will not seek re-election following allegations that he sexually harassed former members of his staff, the New York Times reports.

Ian Conyers, 29, the grandson of Conyers' brother, told the NYT that Conyers, 88, "is not resigning. He is going to retire.”

“His doctor advised him that the rigor of another campaign would be too much for him just in terms of his health," he said.

The younger Conyers told the NYT he planned to run for the seat.

Apologies, I could have sworn I saw he announced he would resign? That's what I get for not double checking before I post.

(12-05-2017 08:23 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 08:17 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 07:03 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

Conyere has announced he will resign.

According to this report - not quite. However, if you have something more recent then that changes things. Not running for reelection is different than resigning immediately.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...921670001/

Quote:WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. John Conyers is expected to announce Tuesday that he will not seek re-election following allegations that he sexually harassed former members of his staff, the New York Times reports.

Ian Conyers, 29, the grandson of Conyers' brother, told the NYT that Conyers, 88, "is not resigning. He is going to retire.”

“His doctor advised him that the rigor of another campaign would be too much for him just in terms of his health," he said.

The younger Conyers told the NYT he planned to run for the seat.

Oh good.

The Archduke of Detroit is just going to pass the ducal estate on to his great nephew.

(12-05-2017 08:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 08:23 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 08:17 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 07:03 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Has Conyers and Franken resigned yet?

Why would they? What examples do we have of any of these people seeing consequences?

Conyere has announced he will resign.

According to this report - not quite. However, if you have something more recent then that changes things. Not running for reelection is different than resigning immediately.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...921670001/

Quote:WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. John Conyers is expected to announce Tuesday that he will not seek re-election following allegations that he sexually harassed former members of his staff, the New York Times reports.

Ian Conyers, 29, the grandson of Conyers' brother, told the NYT that Conyers, 88, "is not resigning. He is going to retire.”

“His doctor advised him that the rigor of another campaign would be too much for him just in terms of his health," he said.

The younger Conyers told the NYT he planned to run for the seat.

Apologies, I could have sworn I saw he announced he would resign? That's what I get for not double checking before I post.

You probably saw that news reported as a resignation that was later reversed once more info came in. The link I provided was written on the 4th but updated this morning.

(12-05-2017 06:45 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 11:11 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:55 PM)miko33 Wrote:  [quote='UCF08' pid='14863654' dateline='1512441732']
[quote='miko33' pid='14863619' dateline='1512441085']
[quote='Owl 69/70/75' pid='14863501' dateline='1512439148']


Doug Jones is very guarded in his views pretending to be a moderate despite his progressive views. That is the classic bait and switch. And his desperate attempt to convince Alabama voters that their votes would be made public if the vote for Moore.

He didn't actually do that.

Technically, you're right he did not say that. However, you know that keeping the wording vague like this would lead the voter to infer from his statement that their individual vote would not be anonymous. IMHO, that's deceitful.

I would agree if he's made such a statement. I'm only aware of HOD claiming he said it in a youtube ad. But when asked for the ad, he linked an unendorsed ad with someone else saying it. Has Jones made such a statement? I owe HOD an apology if so. Though he could have linked to Jones if so making apologies unnecessary. Google is only popping up the Highway 31 ad, nothing on Jones making similar statement.

so what did he do wrong with this woman?