(12-04-2017 09:29 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:21 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Like I said, if you choose to ignore the evidence that has already been presented to you in other threads by other people, well, that's not my problem. And if the yearbook (or scrapbook, as you put it) is real, why haven't we seen it yet? What is she hiding?

Uh, check the front page. There's an entire thread on it.

But back to my point, why do you believe someone who has objectively lied? He stated he knew two of the accusers when interviewed by Hannity, and is now stating he knows none of them. Why do you believe someone willing to lie so blatantly and flippantly to those he deems stupid enough to buy it?

And yet, even while soapboxing your abhorrence of someone you think is lying, you'll own up to voting for Hillary? You are the weakest link, next...

(12-05-2017 04:16 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:29 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  the meltdown from chirpy/squirmy mika and weirdo joe should make for a smoothie turd venti latte in the a.m. 'morrow.....

Thanks for that now indelible visual.

FFS.

Cmon, man!

lol....feel the burn as it etches

I always click over for a few mins. every morning to kickstart my day.....it's a laugh a minute....

how weirdo Joe was once a US house representative is beyond my comprehension.....never mind, it's 'florida man'.....

(12-04-2017 07:46 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 07:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:41 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  So if some of these district or appeals judges get something so grossly wrong, shouldn't there be some way to remove them from the bench?

How many other things have they gotten wrong (due to apparently being completely inept) which never made it to the SCOTUS?


Put some skin in the game and see if they straighten up.

That might work. Then again, some of them might dig in their heels, then sue if they ever get ousted.

Also it'd be patently unconstitutional and goes against the entire basis of our judicial system, but besides those minor issues, it's still a sh*t idea. Now if they refuse to uphold the SCOTUS injunction, then they'll be removed, like the GOPs favorite lying child touched Roy Moore.

You know practically all of Moore's accusers have been proven to have lied, right?

Don't let UCF08 take this off topic. He slid in "Moore" which has nothing to do with this thread.

(12-04-2017 06:55 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:41 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  So if some of these district or appeals judges get something so grossly wrong, shouldn't there be some way to remove them from the bench?

How many other things have they gotten wrong (due to apparently being completely inept) which never made it to the SCOTUS?


Put some skin in the game and see if they straighten up.

That might work. Then again, some of them might dig in their heels, then sue if they ever get ousted.

I know it's just a pipe dream, but it ticks me off that many of these judges -- I have to think intentionally due to political ideology -- read things the way they want rather than what the law -- spirit and letter -- says.

IMO, that's why they are wrong lots of times. However, I don't think they really care. Glad we have the SC to keep those hacks in their place.