![]() |
|
Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban (/thread-836148.html) |
Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - UofMTigerTim - 12-04-2017 04:29 PM http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/04/supreme-court-permits-full-enforcement-trump-travel-ban.html https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-04/u-s-supreme-court-lets-trump-travel-ban-take-full-effect-jasp2kia RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - bullet - 12-04-2017 04:33 PM 7 to 2. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - bullet - 12-04-2017 04:34 PM I'm guessing Ginsburg and Sotomayor are the 2 who voted no, but I haven't seen it anywhere. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - JMUDunk - 12-04-2017 04:36 PM Just so much #winning. I'm bordering on exhaustion. Phew RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - rath v2.0 - 12-04-2017 04:36 PM 7-2 isn’t even close in a baseball game. At the USSC it’s a curb stomping. Thanks for wasting tons of taxpayer funds. Next. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - SuperFlyBCat - 12-04-2017 04:43 PM
RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - Kronke - 12-04-2017 04:52 PM Still not tired of winning, Mr. President. ![]()
RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - JMUDunk - 12-04-2017 04:53 PM (12-04-2017 04:36 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: 7-2 isn’t even close in a baseball game. At the USSC it’s a curb stomping. But MUH HAWAI'I judge!!! ![]() 7-2. Curb stomp. Edit: Just saw other posts on the matter= ![]() ![]()
RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - MemTigers1998 - 12-04-2017 05:01 PM (12-04-2017 04:52 PM)Kronke Wrote: This makes me lol
RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - UTSAMarineVet09 - 12-04-2017 05:07 PM MAGA!!! RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - Kaplony - 12-04-2017 05:40 PM
RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - rath v2.0 - 12-04-2017 05:50 PM Without even looking was it Sotojusticewarrior and Darth Bader who held out? RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - HeartOfDixie - 12-04-2017 05:55 PM Nobody with a clue is very surprised. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - Kaplony - 12-04-2017 06:02 PM (12-04-2017 05:50 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Without even looking was it Sotojusticewarrior and Darth Bader who held out? Yep. Quote:Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented without explanation. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - rath v2.0 - 12-04-2017 06:05 PM I don’t know why they even ask them to vote. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - Kronke - 12-04-2017 06:23 PM I remember an argument I had with a resident alt-leftist about how Kagan would rule. I was right, he was wrong. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - stinkfist - 12-04-2017 06:29 PM the meltdown from chirpy/squirmy mika and weirdo joe should make for a smoothie turd venti latte in the a.m. 'morrow..... RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - GeminiCoog - 12-04-2017 06:32 PM I can't wait for the meltdown from Richa -- I mean Rachel Maddow tonight. Should be a dandy. RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - stinkfist - 12-04-2017 06:34 PM (12-04-2017 06:32 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote: I can't wait for the meltdown from Richa -- I mean Rachel Maddow tonight. Should be a dandy. I have to admit....first commercial break during the nhl game, nuts zongo is going to have to flip over to watch that 'crazy'.... RE: Supreme Court permits full enforcement of travel ban - rath v2.0 - 12-04-2017 06:37 PM (12-04-2017 06:23 PM)Kronke Wrote: I remember an argument I had with a resident alt-leftist about how Kagan would rule. Kagan is at least an honest liberal. She is reasonable. Those other two ladies decide cases before oral argument. |