(11-30-2017 10:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 10:18 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:18 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was well coordinated on the front end I'll give them that. They played their hand too early. Every person involved in this turned out to be a lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud, an addcit or a combination of all three.

Source for any of these claims? Literally any source? Evidence?

Nah, you don't need evidence except the fact they're accusing a member of your political party of a wrongdoing, and that's all it takes to call them a "lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud" and "an addict".

The evidence is: they wont release the yearbook. If this was really Judge Moore's signature they would have already had 8 experts analyze it. Release the yearbook. Don't hold it hostage to unreasonable demands. For the good of the country release it Gloria.

They won't because it's a lie. If there was modicum of proof it would be on every damn network 24/7

Release the yearbook you G'd damned two bit shyster.

(11-30-2017 10:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 10:18 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:18 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was well coordinated on the front end I'll give them that. They played their hand too early. Every person involved in this turned out to be a lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud, an addcit or a combination of all three.

Source for any of these claims? Literally any source? Evidence?

Nah, you don't need evidence except the fact they're accusing a member of your political party of a wrongdoing, and that's all it takes to call them a "lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud" and "an addict".

The evidence is: they wont release the yearbook. If this was really Judge Moore's signature they would have already had 8 experts analyze it. Release the yearbook. Don't hold it hostage to unreasonable demands. For the good of the country release it Gloria.

They won't because it's a lie.

This will be added to the other disciplinary matters pending against Aldredge. She screwed the pooch on this.

I hope after he wins he pursues matters against the entire cabal.

(11-30-2017 10:23 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 10:20 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 10:18 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:18 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was well coordinated on the front end I'll give them that. They played their hand too early. Every person involved in this turned out to be a lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud, an addcit or a combination of all three.

Source for any of these claims? Literally any source? Evidence?

Nah, you don't need evidence except the fact they're accusing a member of your political party of a wrongdoing, and that's all it takes to call them a "lying liberal shill, a habitual fraud" and "an addict".

The evidence is: they wont release the yearbook. If this was really Judge Moore's signature they would have already had 8 experts analyze it. Release the yearbook. Don't hold it hostage to unreasonable demands. For the good of the country release it Gloria.

They won't because it's a lie.

This will be added to the other disciplinary matters pending against Aldredge. She screwed the pooch on this.

I hope after he wins he pursues matters against the entire cabal.

If Roy screwed a pooch he would be the democrat candidate.

(11-30-2017 09:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Your team cheated and got caught. What a mess. You should be pissed you fell for it and then cheerleaded fir it. Shill.

It’s like the Pom Pom boys for that entire ROOOSKIES!!! Ruse.

Talk about desperation, holy crap.

How many on the right just completely flipped their schit over the election of our community organizer in chief? I don’t recall anything approaching this level of delusional desperation at all.

But, maybe I just wasn’t paying close enough attention for 8 years?!?

*shrugs.

(11-30-2017 10:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 09:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Your team cheated and got caught. What a mess. You should be pissed you fell for it and then cheerleaded fir it. Shill.

Rapin Roy is still a child molester. No amount of Breitbartery or O'Keefery changes that. Half of Gadsden is aware of it and has been for years.

Even if you can discredit one accuser, there's still TEN more. And its not like the white nationalists haven't been trying to pull this Soviet level misinformation crap with O'Keefe and got busted doing it.

My gosh,

Has H> now stooped so low as to be posting around here?!?

Wha Happin?!?

Only thing missing from this is the woman hating white women...

Lol

Gotta completely dismiss, ignore, disregard and lie about Moore's own admissions to get to he's never done what he's done.

(11-30-2017 10:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Rapin Roy is still a child molester. No amount of Breitbartery or O'Keefery changes that. Half of Gadsden is aware of it and has been for years.

Even if you can discredit one accuser, there's still TEN more.

Aware of it.. or just assumes it?

There we go again, someone saying... "I know it's true, because it's true!"

Show me some proof Tom... otherwise, you're doing EXACTLY the same as Brooks (and we'll limit it to Brooks, since he was the first one named).

(11-30-2017 09:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 07:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks said Tuesday that a woman who accused Republican nominee for US Senate Roy Moore of sexually assaulting her when she was 16 is "clearly a liar."


So, now you're down to one witness who said that Roy Moore engaged in nonconsensual sexual contact, okay?" he said. "Well, that one witness' testimony is in direct and stark contrast with that of the other seven ladies, who said that he acted like an officer and a gentleman. And you look at the preponderance of the evidence and then you add Roy Moore's denial....

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/11/29/polit...index.html

(No gutless blind link)

Looking at the link, it's just a GOP Representative claiming she's a liar and that the signature is forged. He provided no evidence and there is no one coming forward to back up his assertion based on evidence; it is quite literally just a member of the GOP saying she's a liar. Yet here you are, making a thread treating it like it's a certifiable fact.

But I guess since this is fake, so are the other unconnected women making similar allegations, so are the half dozen people confirming these women's allegations, so were the unrelated people who recollect Moore preying on teens so much it was noticeable, so was the book passage where stated that as a 30+ year old man he first "noticed" his wife when she was 15 at a dance recital he just happened to be attending for no discernible reason, and so was the Hannity interview where he admitted to dating teens as a 30 year old DA but defended himself by saying he always got their mothers permission. Sure, that all adds up.

how come no one's commented on this?

I’m a nice person. I’m never one to stir the pot, rock the boat, start the proverbial ****. (Okay, then pretend, if you have to .)

However, even though I have no dog in this fight as this is clearly a local Alabama issue, let me say I will soooooo enjoy the liberal meltdown when he is elected.