On Wednesday, a leaked analysis from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation showed that 38 percent of Americans would not get a significant tax cut in 2019 under the Senate tax bill. The estimate reinforces multiple studies showing that the wealthiest Americans would be the biggest winners under the House and Senate tax bills, despite Republicans’ repeated claims to the contrary.



http://Linky WinkyLinky Winky


I don't think this is what Americans expected.

Well it's not like Trump ever promised he would raise taxes on the highest earners, or himself.

Mother Jones Alert

(11-30-2017 03:04 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Mother Jones Alert

I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

(11-30-2017 03:09 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:04 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Mother Jones Alert

I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:09 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:04 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Mother Jones Alert

I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

So in other words.

Bury your head in the sand.

(11-30-2017 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  On Wednesday, a leaked analysis from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation showed that 38 percent of Americans would not get a significant tax cut in 2019 under the Senate tax bill. The estimate reinforces multiple studies showing that the wealthiest Americans would be the biggest winners under the House and Senate tax bills, despite Republicans’ repeated claims to the contrary.



http://Linky WinkyLinky Winky


I don't think this is what Americans expected.

Blind link to motherjones

Well you can't say I didn't tell you so.

(11-30-2017 03:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  On Wednesday, a leaked analysis from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation showed that 38 percent of Americans would not get a significant tax cut in 2019 under the Senate tax bill. The estimate reinforces multiple studies showing that the wealthiest Americans would be the biggest winners under the House and Senate tax bills, despite Republicans’ repeated claims to the contrary.



http://Linky WinkyLinky Winky


I don't think this is what Americans expected.

Blind link to motherjones

Mother*******Jones?

(11-30-2017 04:50 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  On Wednesday, a leaked analysis from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation showed that 38 percent of Americans would not get a significant tax cut in 2019 under the Senate tax bill. The estimate reinforces multiple studies showing that the wealthiest Americans would be the biggest winners under the House and Senate tax bills, despite Republicans’ repeated claims to the contrary.



http://Linky WinkyLinky Winky


I don't think this is what Americans expected.

Blind link to motherjones

Mother*******Jones?

Forget the source.

The question is whether or not the information is correct. If it isn't then provide the evidence.

It isn't that hard people.

It's mother jones. That is like a leftist Onion.

(11-30-2017 04:48 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Well you can't say I didn't tell you so.

Oh I never click on your links. I just hit respond and read the full link. I'm not giving motherjones clicks unless there is nudity. Lol

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I don't click on buzzfeed

Then how will you ever know what type of 80's Doritos flavor you would be?

ya gotta love (that means hate for the dense) the dippos......

Schumer: if there are 51 ® yea votes, then he'll release the ones up for reelection to vote yea tomorrow.....

more fk'n liberal yankee political faggotism.....

by next year???.....it won't matter if that dipshite were to kiss the pope's ring.....

what a schmeckel that guy is....

(11-30-2017 03:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:09 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:04 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Mother Jones Alert

I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

So in other words.

Bury your head in the sand.

You do it all of the time. Why should we allow you to corner the market on that?

(11-30-2017 06:14 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I don't click on buzzfeed

Then how will you ever know what type of 80's Doritos flavor you would be?

(11-30-2017 06:17 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:09 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:04 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Mother Jones Alert

I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

So in other words.

Bury your head in the sand.

You do it all of the time. Why should we allow you to corner the market on that?

Fit, post the analyses in text and graphs, make sure to include what deductions are still included for regular employed people, self employed etc. Tax rates etc. Tax deferred accounts, write offs at what %'s, mortgage interest deductions, etc. all of it.
Not clicking on you links, don't be lazy dude.

(11-30-2017 06:25 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 06:17 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:09 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  I haven't seen a single serious analysis which contradicts this conclusion, have you?

I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

So in other words.

Bury your head in the sand.

You do it all of the time. Why should we allow you to corner the market on that?

Fit, post the analyses in text and graphs, make sure to include what deductions are still included for regular employed people, self employed etc. Tax rates etc. Tax deferred accounts, write offs at what %'s, mortgage interest deductions, etc. all of it.
Not clicking on you links, don't be lazy dude.

Who gets a tax cut or increase in 2019?
No change means a taxpayer owes within $100 of what they pay now.

Tax CutNo ChangeTax Increase
$20-30k
45.6%
49.1%
$50-75k
80.3%
10.3%
9.5%
$100-200k
83.7%
14.3%
$500-$1 million
91.5%
8.5%
Above $1 million
80.4%
19.4%
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation Created with Datawrapper

(12-01-2017 11:51 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 06:25 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 06:17 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:24 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I don't click on Fit's Mother Jones, Salon or buzzfeed stuff.

So in other words.

Bury your head in the sand.

You do it all of the time. Why should we allow you to corner the market on that?

Fit, post the analyses in text and graphs, make sure to include what deductions are still included for regular employed people, self employed etc. Tax rates etc. Tax deferred accounts, write offs at what %'s, mortgage interest deductions, etc. all of it.
Not clicking on you links, don't be lazy dude.

Who gets a tax cut or increase in 2019?
No change means a taxpayer owes within $100 of what they pay now.

Tax CutNo ChangeTax Increase
$20-30k
45.6%
49.1%
$50-75k
80.3%
10.3%
9.5%
$100-200k
83.7%
14.3%
$500-$1 million
91.5%
8.5%
Above $1 million
80.4%
19.4%
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation Created with Datawrapper

Really bad graphics, try better formatting. You included virtually nothing here.