(11-28-2017 10:32 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:18 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 06:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL.

Convicted criminal James O'Keefe tried to set up the WaPo, by having a woman falsely claiming that she was impregnated by Roy Moore as a teenager. The WaPo didn't run the story because they couldn't confirm it. The accuser was then seen walking out of The "Veritas" Group's NYC offices.

LOL. If you try to peddle misinformation, can you really call yourself "Veritas". More like "Soviet Style Misinformation"

https://www.thedailybeast.com/washington...oore-story

It is extremely sad that a group would do this to try and shame the 9 that have come forward.

It's also a shame that people would make false accusations and the media runs with it.

Some of these 9 have "questionable" stories that are being contradicted.

Then there's the whole Duke Lacrosse incident.

That's literally what happened here, with explicit evidence showing it occurring and showing their political motives, and yet here you are blaming other people for doing it.

It amazes me how this man can engage in "fake news" on an almost daily basis and his supporters will continue to believe him when comes up with an edited version of the truth.

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

The sad thing is, they probably could have gotten somewhere if they focused on his dating instead of making up muh sexual assault.

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

(11-28-2017 11:53 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

Has he been proven to be guilty of the accusations yet? I must have missed that. You say it so assuredly... link?

(11-28-2017 11:53 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

I'd bet on it being a fake... oh wait, nevermind.

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:55 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 10:49 AM)fsquid Wrote:  again, one accuser versus multiple. Also, Moore has only specifically denied 2 out of the 9 allegations.

Those were the only 2 accusing him of doing anything illegal...

And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Source stating it's a fake yearbook signature? You won't find one except for Moore and his attorney.

If the person presenting the yearbook wants to be believed shouldn't they allow the evidence to be authenticated

(11-28-2017 12:10 PM)solohawks Wrote:  If the person presenting the yearbook wants to be believed shouldn't they allow the evidence to be authenticated

We've been through this fake yearbook sig how many times? Google ain't hard. Not even Gloria Allred will stand behind it. Don't feed the troll.

(11-28-2017 12:25 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 12:10 PM)solohawks Wrote:  If the person presenting the yearbook wants to be believed shouldn't they allow the evidence to be authenticated

We've been through this fake yearbook sig how many times? Google ain't hard. Not even Gloria Allred will stand behind it. Don't feed the troll.

No, you've been swallowing fake news since day one of this. Claiming they were paid, claiming they lied, claiming any unsourced post you've read on Twitter is factually verified.

What actual evidence, provided by valid sources, do you have that it's fake?

(11-28-2017 12:04 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:53 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:00 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  And their stories have been shot to kingdom come.

But, accusations!

Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

Has he been proven to be guilty of the accusations yet? I must have missed that. You say it so assuredly... link?

Funny... no where in this thread did I affirm his guilt. Get your eyes checked.

(11-28-2017 12:37 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 12:25 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 12:10 PM)solohawks Wrote:  If the person presenting the yearbook wants to be believed shouldn't they allow the evidence to be authenticated

We've been through this fake yearbook sig how many times? Google ain't hard. Not even Gloria Allred will stand behind it. Don't feed the troll.

No, you've been swallowing fake news since day one of this. Claiming they were paid, claiming they lied, claiming any unsourced post you've read on Twitter is factually verified.

What actual evidence, provided by valid sources, do you have that it's fake?

The analysis was done by a multitude of highly respected citizen journalists. If you are looking for a link to the failing NY Times, that's your problem.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-28-2017 12:43 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 12:04 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:53 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

Has he been proven to be guilty of the accusations yet? I must have missed that. You say it so assuredly... link?

Funny... no where in this thread did I affirm his guilt. Get your eyes checked.

It's easier for them to respond when they make up your arguments for you.

Anyone else watch the videos and care to comment? I think it sums up Project Veritas incompetence nicely.

(11-28-2017 12:43 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 12:04 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:53 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:51 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2017 11:35 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source for this claim?

Want to start with the fake yearbook signature?

Funny you mention that:


Gloria Allred demands Moore testify under oath in exchange for yearbook
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/362...rification


Has it been proven to be fake yet? I must have missed that. You say it so defiantly... link?

Has he been proven to be guilty of the accusations yet? I must have missed that. You say it so assuredly... link?

Funny... no where in this thread did I affirm his guilt. Get your eyes checked.

That's actually great news. Now we're getting somewhere.

So you assume his innocence at this point.

(11-29-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Anyone else watch the videos and care to comment? I think it sums up Project Veritas incompetence nicely.