One rule for everybody.

If they did it, they're gone. But that's on the proof, not the allegation.

(11-24-2017 12:11 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  You know what they say about glass houses. Why is it okay for her to engage in this behavior?

Wow... really?

Because he seems perfectly capable of saying 'no' and he doesn't.

In fact, I can't think of any reason OTHER than what she's doing in the video for her to be up there on stage at all. Can you?

That in and of itself doesn't make it okay... you can 'go along' with something and still not be okay with it....

but there is a difference between
implied consent (by not saying no)
ignored consent (the 'no' is ignored) and
inability to consent (asleep, minor, influence etc)

and in the photo, FRANKEN is performing, but SHE doesn't seem to be. In the video, BOTH are performing.

This isn't he said she said, it's she said, picture supports and he admits (she was asleep). None of the others there claim she was awake either. THAT is far more than he said/she said.

the 'flack jackets for groping' comment is nor even worth responding to.

(11-24-2017 02:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 01:04 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:37 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:11 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:00 PM)EagleX Wrote:  attacking the victim. you misogynistic pig. men like you are the reason that women hesitate to report sex crimes committed by powerful men.

in effect, you're molesting her a second time.

You know what they say about glass houses. Why is it okay for her to engage in this behavior?

okay, first things first. do you understand that arnold schwarzenegger isn't really a robot, and he didn't really just kill the lady in the blue dress? let's start there.

and assuming that we get past that, do you also understand that kirsten dunst isn't really having sex with this guy?

Do you understand from the photo you can tell Franken's fingers are not touching the flak jacket she is wearing. Everyone knows flak vest are ideal for groping. Was she asleep or was she performing? He is looking back at the camera, was he performing? Are you shouting from the rooftop's for the Trump and Moore accusers? And did you notice I did not say anything about the other Franken accusers? Because like Tweeden they should be heard. We have heard from Tweeden, and we can disagree, but I think she comes across as badly, like she is only doing this to get her name out there in the hopes it might give a boost to her career.

Me thinks xe don't understand why this is relevant.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-24-2017 04:20 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 02:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 01:04 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:37 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:11 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  You know what they say about glass houses. Why is it okay for her to engage in this behavior?

okay, first things first. do you understand that arnold schwarzenegger isn't really a robot, and he didn't really just kill the lady in the blue dress? let's start there.

and assuming that we get past that, do you also understand that kirsten dunst isn't really having sex with this guy?

Do you understand from the photo you can tell Franken's fingers are not touching the flak jacket she is wearing. Everyone knows flak vest are ideal for groping. Was she asleep or was she performing? He is looking back at the camera, was he performing? Are you shouting from the rooftop's for the Trump and Moore accusers? And did you notice I did not say anything about the other Franken accusers? Because like Tweeden they should be heard. We have heard from Tweeden, and we can disagree, but I think she comes across as badly, like she is only doing this to get her name out there in the hopes it might give a boost to her career.

Me thinks xe don't understand why this is relevant.

yeah, he's not even in the same time zone as the point.

(11-24-2017 06:06 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 04:20 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 02:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 01:04 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 12:37 PM)EagleX Wrote:  okay, first things first. do you understand that arnold schwarzenegger isn't really a robot, and he didn't really just kill the lady in the blue dress? let's start there.

and assuming that we get past that, do you also understand that kirsten dunst isn't really having sex with this guy?

Do you understand from the photo you can tell Franken's fingers are not touching the flak jacket she is wearing. Everyone knows flak vest are ideal for groping. Was she asleep or was she performing? He is looking back at the camera, was he performing? Are you shouting from the rooftop's for the Trump and Moore accusers? And did you notice I did not say anything about the other Franken accusers? Because like Tweeden they should be heard. We have heard from Tweeden, and we can disagree, but I think she comes across as badly, like she is only doing this to get her name out there in the hopes it might give a boost to her career.

Me thinks xe don't understand why this is relevant.

yeah, he's not even in the same time zone as the point.

...but but but......he's eccentric.....lmfao

another intentional edit: exocentric.....

(11-24-2017 06:10 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:06 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 04:20 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 02:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 01:04 PM)EagleX Wrote:  and assuming that we get past that, do you also understand that kirsten dunst isn't really having sex with this guy?

Do you understand from the photo you can tell Franken's fingers are not touching the flak jacket she is wearing. Everyone knows flak vest are ideal for groping. Was she asleep or was she performing? He is looking back at the camera, was he performing? Are you shouting from the rooftop's for the Trump and Moore accusers? And did you notice I did not say anything about the other Franken accusers? Because like Tweeden they should be heard. We have heard from Tweeden, and we can disagree, but I think she comes across as badly, like she is only doing this to get her name out there in the hopes it might give a boost to her career.

Me thinks xe don't understand why this is relevant.

yeah, he's not even in the same time zone as the point.

...but but but......he's eccentric.....lmfao

another intentional edit: exocentric.....

I hope he runs for reelection.

He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

Moore should do a press conference late tonight after all the lib media has excused Franken and given their blessing on his staying in Congress. He should say he still denies the specific charges, but apologizes to women that may have felt threatened or preyed upon because he has to respect their belief that it happened and he will continue to work for women in the future.

The media double-talk would be astounding as they accepted Franken's apology and continued to persecute Moore for mere allegations.

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Oh!

If the alt-left didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

so, loudly and conspicuously claiming to be the sacred protector of women, when in reality, you have been secretly molesting in the them in the shadows for decades and intimidating them into silence is a-ok in your book?

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's addressing the media right now, clearly not going to resign. Pathetic.

When asked, he said he couldn't be sure if there will be more allegations or not. If there are more out there, come forward now. This predator does not belong in the US Senate.

We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

(11-27-2017 01:57 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

pretty low bar. I guess when you supported a president who was a serial sex offender, you learn to just live with that sort of thing.

(11-27-2017 01:57 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 11:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I think no person who has abused women should be in government.

How about you?

(11-27-2017 01:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  We'll let Minnesota decide.

Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

I don't know. Does that suddenly make a difference?

(11-27-2017 01:58 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:57 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

pretty low bar. I guess when you supported a president who was a serial sex offender, you learn to just live with that sort of thing.

Obama was a serial sex offender? Does Michelle know about this?

(11-27-2017 02:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:58 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:57 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

pretty low bar. I guess when you supported a president who was a serial sex offender, you learn to just live with that sort of thing.

Obama was a serial sex offender? Does Michelle know about this?

(11-27-2017 01:59 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:57 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:55 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:51 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:48 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Do you think Franken should stay in the Senate?

Has he done anything that would disqualify him from doing his job?

He's abused women

Is he going to be charged with a crime?

I don't know. Does that suddenly make a difference?

You tell me. Can a sitting member of Congress be removed from office for being a creep?