(09-28-2017 03:12 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 09:45 AM)NBPirate Wrote:  I'm sure the G4 would love that, but the AAC would not. McMurphy can take a hike. Guy has mental issues.

We aren't spending $300M to be D2

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Too bad...know your place, boy

Why is Brett so invested in this? He's now at the point where he is arguing with fans on twitter to just accept outside status

(09-28-2017 03:19 PM)knightastic Wrote:  Why is Brett so invested in this? He's now at the point where he is arguing with fans on twitter to just accept outside status

Because it's getting him attention while he's unemployed.

USFFan

Ignore the fool mcmurphy

(09-28-2017 03:31 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Ignore the fool mcmurphy

Yep, don't click on his bait

This guy is such a tool, but I really just do not understand the visceral hatred he has for the AAC. He clearly didn't get accepted to one of our schools.

(09-28-2017 03:31 PM)Fat Harry Wrote:  This guy is such a tool, but I really just do not understand the visceral hatred he has for the AAC. He clearly didn't get accepted to one of our schools.

it's odd & he lives in Tampa so he is within 150 miles of 2 AAC schools yet all he does is troll and belittle

McMurphy is an idiot.

(09-28-2017 03:14 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 03:12 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 09:45 AM)NBPirate Wrote:  I'm sure the G4 would love that, but the AAC would not. McMurphy can take a hike. Guy has mental issues.

We aren't spending $300M to be D2

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Too bad...know your place, boy

With a size 14 boot on your throat son

Roah-roe....

McMurphy's at it again?
Well then, I'll say again Hell No!

The reason he spews so much **** against the AAC is because he hates USF. When Jim Leavitt was our coach he didn't get along with or respected Mcfuckhead. Ever since then, he's always had an ax to grind with anything USF related.

From all USF fans, we apologize that we summoned this troll...

(09-28-2017 10:28 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:14 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Guys, as much as you want to believe the AAC will be create a P6. I think it is far more likely a P4 will occur. The best shot for many AAC teams is for the P5 to stay around. The B12 will need to expand, especially if they lose teams Texas, OSU, OU and TCU/Tech. I think having the B12 name and NYD tie-in will allow them to poach from the G5. Houston, SMU are perfect backfills for the Texas School. UCF and USF would be two strong adds. Tulsa could replace the OK market but I think CSU makes more sense. Finally, Memphis or Cinci as the bridge to the midwest. That would be a pretty darn football conference. Not slamming SDSU or UCONN, but they are just two islands I don't think the B12 would want to deal with.

I think the CFP expansion will eventually give the G5 a legitimate path to the playoff. Once that happens, life in a non-autonomous conference really wont be all that bad.

I don't want a pity party spot in the playoffs. Expand it to 8 teams, the 8 best teams. That way we have a shot and it would be deserved.

(09-28-2017 06:09 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:28 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:14 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Guys, as much as you want to believe the AAC will be create a P6. I think it is far more likely a P4 will occur. The best shot for many AAC teams is for the P5 to stay around. The B12 will need to expand, especially if they lose teams Texas, OSU, OU and TCU/Tech. I think having the B12 name and NYD tie-in will allow them to poach from the G5. Houston, SMU are perfect backfills for the Texas School. UCF and USF would be two strong adds. Tulsa could replace the OK market but I think CSU makes more sense. Finally, Memphis or Cinci as the bridge to the midwest. That would be a pretty darn football conference. Not slamming SDSU or UCONN, but they are just two islands I don't think the B12 would want to deal with.

I think the CFP expansion will eventually give the G5 a legitimate path to the playoff. Once that happens, life in a non-autonomous conference really wont be all that bad.

I don't want a pity party spot in the playoffs. Expand it to 8 teams, the 8 best teams. That way we have a shot and it would be deserved.

I think that's what he meant.

(09-28-2017 06:09 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:28 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:14 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Guys, as much as you want to believe the AAC will be create a P6. I think it is far more likely a P4 will occur. The best shot for many AAC teams is for the P5 to stay around. The B12 will need to expand, especially if they lose teams Texas, OSU, OU and TCU/Tech. I think having the B12 name and NYD tie-in will allow them to poach from the G5. Houston, SMU are perfect backfills for the Texas School. UCF and USF would be two strong adds. Tulsa could replace the OK market but I think CSU makes more sense. Finally, Memphis or Cinci as the bridge to the midwest. That would be a pretty darn football conference. Not slamming SDSU or UCONN, but they are just two islands I don't think the B12 would want to deal with.

I think the CFP expansion will eventually give the G5 a legitimate path to the playoff. Once that happens, life in a non-autonomous conference really wont be all that bad.

I don't want a pity party spot in the playoffs. Expand it to 8 teams, the 8 best teams. That way we have a shot and it would be deserved.

Its not a pity party. If you get it, it will because you team was the best out of the G5 champs. It needs to be a guaranteed G5 slot, because otherwise, the G5's will never get in---deserved or not---due to the expresmely stacked and biased slection committee. Thats one place where McMurphy is 100% right. The selection committee will play the "strength of schedule" card every single time to block a G5.

That said---Im 100% willing to go with a straight "top 8" with no automatic bids-----but----if thats how its done----then the selection committee MUST be a 10 member panel comprised of one rep for each FBS conference. One-conference---one vote--with the G5 making up 50% of the panel. Under those conditions Im fine with a straight top 8.

I am waiting for the college football selection committee FBI investigation to begain

(09-28-2017 07:30 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 06:09 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:28 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:14 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Guys, as much as you want to believe the AAC will be create a P6. I think it is far more likely a P4 will occur. The best shot for many AAC teams is for the P5 to stay around. The B12 will need to expand, especially if they lose teams Texas, OSU, OU and TCU/Tech. I think having the B12 name and NYD tie-in will allow them to poach from the G5. Houston, SMU are perfect backfills for the Texas School. UCF and USF would be two strong adds. Tulsa could replace the OK market but I think CSU makes more sense. Finally, Memphis or Cinci as the bridge to the midwest. That would be a pretty darn football conference. Not slamming SDSU or UCONN, but they are just two islands I don't think the B12 would want to deal with.

I think the CFP expansion will eventually give the G5 a legitimate path to the playoff. Once that happens, life in a non-autonomous conference really wont be all that bad.

I don't want a pity party spot in the playoffs. Expand it to 8 teams, the 8 best teams. That way we have a shot and it would be deserved.

Its not a pity party. If you get it, it will because you team was the best out of the G5 champs. It needs to be a guaranteed G5 slot, because otherwise, the G5's will never get in---deserved or not---due to the expresmely stacked and biased slection committee. Thats one place where McMurphy is 100% right. The selection committee will play the "strength of schedule" card every single time to block a G5.

That said---Im 100% willing to go with a straight "top 8" with no automatic bids-----but----if thats how its done----then the selection committee MUST be a 10 member panel comprised of one rep for each FBS conference. One-conference---one vote--with the G5 making up 50% of the panel. Under those conditions Im fine with a straight top 8.

Wow, I stand corrected, and concede your point.

(09-28-2017 09:12 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 07:30 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 06:09 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:28 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 10:14 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Guys, as much as you want to believe the AAC will be create a P6. I think it is far more likely a P4 will occur. The best shot for many AAC teams is for the P5 to stay around. The B12 will need to expand, especially if they lose teams Texas, OSU, OU and TCU/Tech. I think having the B12 name and NYD tie-in will allow them to poach from the G5. Houston, SMU are perfect backfills for the Texas School. UCF and USF would be two strong adds. Tulsa could replace the OK market but I think CSU makes more sense. Finally, Memphis or Cinci as the bridge to the midwest. That would be a pretty darn football conference. Not slamming SDSU or UCONN, but they are just two islands I don't think the B12 would want to deal with.

I think the CFP expansion will eventually give the G5 a legitimate path to the playoff. Once that happens, life in a non-autonomous conference really wont be all that bad.

I don't want a pity party spot in the playoffs. Expand it to 8 teams, the 8 best teams. That way we have a shot and it would be deserved.

Its not a pity party. If you get it, it will because you team was the best out of the G5 champs. It needs to be a guaranteed G5 slot, because otherwise, the G5's will never get in---deserved or not---due to the expresmely stacked and biased slection committee. Thats one place where McMurphy is 100% right. The selection committee will play the "strength of schedule" card every single time to block a G5.

That said---Im 100% willing to go with a straight "top 8" with no automatic bids-----but----if thats how its done----then the selection committee MUST be a 10 member panel comprised of one rep for each FBS conference. One-conference---one vote--with the G5 making up 50% of the panel. Under those conditions Im fine with a straight top 8.

Wow, I stand corrected, and concede your point.

Personally I wish they would use the computers to rank the teams and then just have an 8 team playoff. It takes out human bias,and puts enough in the field you're guaranteed to get the best team as your champion.

LOL... Poor McMurph so desperate for clicks... Anything he writes is pure garbage... My respect towards that man has gone out the window and never coming back.

Has anyone checked in on ole Brett to make sure his head hasn't exploded with three AAC P6 teams in the top 25?