(09-15-2017 09:29 AM)Fitbud Wrote: (09-15-2017 09:28 AM)umbluegray Wrote: (09-14-2017 10:25 AM)Fitbud Wrote: "The Berkeley College Republicans present Ben Shapiro vs. Berkeley"?
Well with that kind of language, what would one expect to happen?
Yeah, that's what prompted the antifa movement.
So then you think language can cause action?
It was sarcasm.
But this could be an interesting topic to discuss.
Language is a word with many different meanings. What do you mean by language in this context?
I assume we're talking about the content of the message.
Do I think the message a person sends actually causes action? No. Not in and of itself, that is, sound waves received and interpret ted by the receiver.
There are ONLY two things in life that any individual is really responsible for:
1. Their actions
2. Their reactions to the actions of others
Only I am responsible for what I do. You can't be held accountable for my actions nor can I be held accountable for yours.
Though you are responsible for your actions I am responsible for how I react to your actions.
I could don a mask to hide my identity and band together with others and start destroying private and public property. I could even blame it on you. I could say your actions MADE me do it.
I guess if I was a strict materialist along the lines of Dawkins then I could argue that actions and reactions are nothing but random reflexes for which none of us have control. But that's just silly.
No. When I engage in behavior, I'm solely responsible for what I do. It doesn't matter what you say -- either to me directly or to the public.
Does language cause actions? It's used as an excuse, but in and of itself? No.