It's good to see the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda hard at work trying to educate us today.

(04-06-2017 12:02 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  It's good to see the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda hard at work trying to educate us today.

Right...400 or so posts sucking on Trump's schlong without one shred of evidence is sooo much different.

You people...

(04-06-2017 12:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:02 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  It's good to see the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda hard at work trying to educate us today.

Right...400 or so posts sucking on Trump's schlong without one shred of evidence is sooo much different.

You people...

As compared to your 400 or so posts attacking Trump without one shred of evidence.

(04-06-2017 12:16 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:02 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  It's good to see the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda hard at work trying to educate us today.

Right...400 or so posts sucking on Trump's schlong without one shred of evidence is sooo much different.

You people...

As compared to your 400 or so posts attacking Trump without one shred of evidence.

Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

We have to come up with some sort of meme for all the fail threads these guys come up with. 4 D chess maybe?

(04-06-2017 12:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  We have to come up with some sort of meme for all the fail threads these guys come up with. 4 D chess maybe?

#Buckle Up!

(04-06-2017 12:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

(04-06-2017 12:28 PM)green Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

But I will. There is no evidence currently that Trump committed any crime and there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.

Your turn for Obama and Rice.

SOUNDS OF SILENCE

(04-06-2017 12:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:28 PM)green Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

But I will. There is no evidence currently that Trump committed any crime and there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.

Your turn for Obama and Rice.

SOUNDS OF SILENCE

Rice lied about knowing anything about the unmasking of Trump officials, then admitted she did it quite often after getting outted.

That is light years ahead of where Trump Russia has ever been. We're to the point Rice and Obama need to testify under oath.

(04-06-2017 12:36 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:28 PM)green Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

But I will. There is no evidence currently that Trump committed any crime and there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.

Your turn for Obama and Rice.

SOUNDS OF SILENCE

Rice lied about knowing anything about the unmasking of Trump officials...

there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.


What would you call Roger Stone telling people about Wiki Leak's dump of Podesta emails? A lucky guess?

(04-06-2017 12:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:36 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:28 PM)green Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Pfft...show me one where I said Trump definitely committed a crime.

Thought so.

#fail

you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

But I will. There is no evidence currently that Trump committed any crime and there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.

Your turn for Obama and Rice.

SOUNDS OF SILENCE

Rice lied about knowing anything about the unmasking of Trump officials...

(04-06-2017 12:44 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.


What would you call Roger Stone telling people about Wiki Leak's dump of Podesta emails? A lucky guess?

Donald Trump’s campaign said they have fired Roger Stone, the self-described political “hit man” who has long advised Trump. Stone, however, told msnbc he was not terminated and instead resigned over Trump’s behavior.
-- msnbc.com 08/08/15

SPECTATOR SPORT

(04-06-2017 12:44 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:36 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:28 PM)green Wrote:  you don't have to come right out and say it ...

INNUENDO

But I will. There is no evidence currently that Trump committed any crime and there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.

Your turn for Obama and Rice.

SOUNDS OF SILENCE

Rice lied about knowing anything about the unmasking of Trump officials...

I realize that you're a little slow on the uptake, but what crime did she commit IF she lied about the unmasking to that reporter?

I'll give you a hint. It's none. Your continued childish deflections are quite sad.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/20...epublicans

"...This display of aggressive incuriosity was all the more remarkable given its immediacy. Not only did the national media want to instruct people to ignore Lake’s report, but they also wanted to make sure they were seen as completely unwilling to ask questions on the basis of it. Rather than investigate it and ask tough questions of former Obama administration officials about the approval and dissemination process that gave Rice access to unredacted information about US persons, they wanted to paint the questions themselves as illegitimate.

Furthermore, every one of these pushbacks painted the Rice story as an either/or decision for coverage with the Trump-Russia probe. Major media outlets can cover more than one story at a time, however, and the possibility that an administration might have used intelligence data for political purposes would be just as big a story – if not perhaps even bigger. That, after all, was a key component in the Watergate scandal that brought down the Richard Nixon presidency, a scandal largely uncovered under media pressure.

Perhaps further investigation would demonstrate that Rice and other Obama administration officials did not use intelligence for political purposes. The information from those unredacted transcripts got leaked by someone, though, and Rice is the first major figure known to have accessed them outside of the agencies that collected the data in the first place. After having demonstrated such drive to connect dots between Russians and Trump, the lack of curiosity from the same media to follow up on such an obvious lead on a major leak lends itself to the conclusion that the media only has an interest in intrigue when it involves Republicans."

(04-06-2017 12:44 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.


What would you call Roger Stone telling people about Wiki Leak's dump of Podesta emails? A lucky guess?

What would you call Obama telling russia "just be good until after my last election, then I have some reliability"

(04-06-2017 07:01 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:44 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.


What would you call Roger Stone telling people about Wiki Leak's dump of Podesta emails? A lucky guess?

What would you call Obama telling russia "just be good until after my last election, then I have some reliability"

Obama has never ever been reliable, except to be unreliable!

He did say he could be more flexible.

(04-06-2017 07:01 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(04-06-2017 12:44 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  there is no evidence currently of any collusion between Trump officials and Russia.


What would you call Roger Stone telling people about Wiki Leak's dump of Podesta emails? A lucky guess?

What would you call Obama telling russia "just be good until after my last election, then I have some reliability"

I think he said he'd have more flexibility. Completely different from reliability.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017...usan-rice/

This is new-"The Chicken Noodle Network demonstrated why it has fallen on hard times, saying it would not report bad news about its favorite political personalities... "

"Treating Trump Derangement Syndrome is not easy. Dr. Quackenbush, the celebrated physician would tell you that we must be patient, because there will be episodes of intense derangement, and then the affliction subsides, only to flare again. The confirmation this week of Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court is likely to unhinge Chris, David and Don again.
Dr. Quackenbush, who achieved celluloid immortality in the Marx Brothers movie “A Day at the Races,” was trained to doctor horses, and he would know which end of Chris and the guys to examine. If only he were here."

Trey Gowdy