Why did Flynn still have Trump's "full support" just hours before the DoJ report leaked, seeing as that info was known to Trump for weeks?


The only way you would keep a compromised NSA if you were too compromised. Think about that. The NSA could have been blackmailed. Trump knew this information for WEEKS and did nothing. He had his full support until the DoJ leak. Palace intrigue. Sure hope the Republicans put country over party. We may have a sitting President that deserves to be in Leavenworth. He's probably compromised. I know there are Republican worries because they insist Pence being in on all phone calls with Putin.

Because that is what you say publicly. The dreaded "vote of confidence " usually means you are getting fired

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

(02-14-2017 08:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why did Flynn still have Trump's "full support" just hours before the DoJ report leaked, seeing as that info was known to Trump for weeks?


The only way you would keep a compromised NSA if you were too compromised. Think about that. The NSA could have been blackmailed. Trump knew this information for WEEKS and did nothing. He had his full support until the DoJ leak. Palace intrigue. Sure hope the Republicans put country over party. We may have a sitting President that deserves to be in Leavenworth. He's probably compromised. I know there are Republican worries because they insist Pence being in on all phone calls with Putin.

And Hillary doesn't ?

Oh goodness sake. They knew this information for weeks. Flyn could have been blackmailed with this info. He was compromised. The only way you keep him around is if you too are compromised. No way in hell you keep someone compromised on staff unless this is a bigger clown show that I first thought. I know Trump could shoot somebody on main street and the vast majority on here wouldn't see a problem with it, but what dirt do they have on Trump? He knew about the DNC hacking and they are now blackmailing him with it. (I'm sure they were a part of it but can't prove it) Think about the anti NATO stuff he said. This will not end well.

She broke no laws Card Fan. btw way to dodge duck and parry the op.

There is another interesting question regarding Lynch.

Did the NSA have a court order to eavesdrop on Lynch's conversation? And if they did, why was it authorized? This took place during the Obama administration and is it possible that the Obama folks were overstepping their bounds and trying to subvert the incoming administration?

If there wasn't a court order, the unidentified "officials" quoted by the WaPo were breaking the law when they talked to WaPo. They should be ones going to Leavenworth.

I don't support Lynch and am happy this is behind us. But you can't violate established laws for the sake of politics. That would be the ultimate team over country.

(02-14-2017 08:49 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  She broke no laws Card Fan. btw way to dodge duck and parry the op.

your welcome

(02-14-2017 08:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  We may have a sitting President that deserves to be in Leavenworth. He's probably compromised.

Hillary lost. Get over it.

#schadenfreude

At least they didn't blame it on a video.

It's like this board has been hacked by the Russians. GTS, I believe an investigation is in order.

By the way, what is after math? Social studies or english.

(02-14-2017 08:49 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  She broke no laws Card Fan. btw way to dodge duck and parry the op.

Why do you persist in this falsehood.

no reasonable prosecutor.........................

(02-14-2017 08:36 AM)fsquid Wrote:  Because that is what you say publicly. The dreaded "vote of confidence " usually means you are getting fired

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

Right. I guess Machiavelli doesn't follow sports!

How about Trump's waiters at Maro Lago finding out about N. Korea nuke tests before the JCS? Google that fiasco.

but muh Hillary's emails.........................

(02-14-2017 08:56 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  There is another interesting question regarding Lynch.

Did the NSA have a court order to eavesdrop on Lynch's conversation? And if they did, why was it authorized? This took place during the Obama administration and is it possible that the Obama folks were overstepping their bounds and trying to subvert the incoming administration?

If there wasn't a court order, the unidentified "officials" quoted by the WaPo were breaking the law when they talked to WaPo. They should be ones going to Leavenworth.

I don't support Lynch and am happy this is behind us. But you can't violate established laws for the sake of politics. That would be the ultimate team over country.

This is what bothered me about the whole thing in the first place. We've got some rogue law enforcement around, especially in the FBI. Worse than J. Edgar Hoover.

You guys have elected King Ralph for Prez

(02-14-2017 08:46 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(02-14-2017 08:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why did Flynn still have Trump's "full support" just hours before the DoJ report leaked, seeing as that info was known to Trump for weeks?


The only way you would keep a compromised NSA if you were too compromised. Think about that. The NSA could have been blackmailed. Trump knew this information for WEEKS and did nothing. He had his full support until the DoJ leak. Palace intrigue. Sure hope the Republicans put country over party. We may have a sitting President that deserves to be in Leavenworth. He's probably compromised. I know there are Republican worries because they insist Pence being in on all phone calls with Putin.

And Hillary doesn't ?

Why is Hillary the common response from the TGOP. The election is over, and she did not win.. (that is the problem with Trump.. move on from the election process please) So can we quit saying well H.. did or did not do something. This is about Trump and those that work for him. No one cares about HRC anymore. She is done.. even if she does not know it.

This is what bothered me about the whole thing in the first place. We've got some rogue law enforcement around, especially in the FBI. Worse than J. Edgar Hoover.

Rogue would be what Comey did two weeks before the election. Lordy sakes......... you have the temerity to bring up rogue FBI agents.

PAAAAAAA THETIC

What bothers me more is that the lie didn't take him down, the exposure of the lie did. But that's what we have.