Typical intolerant liberal moralist.

(01-29-2017 04:13 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Anyone at anytime for any reason should be able to serve/not serve whomever they please.

Any private business should have that right, but sadly the SJW have infringed upon it.

(01-29-2017 03:38 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Haha, already 1-starred into oblivion on Google, Yelp, and Facebook. It'll be out of business within a week.

The free market can be stunningly efficient.

(01-29-2017 04:13 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Anyone at anytime for any reason should be able to serve/not serve whomever they please.

DING DING DING! We have a winner. (Also, anyone at anytime for any reason can choose to go to another establishment. It's called voting with your wallet.)

I went into this restaurant this afternoon after church and they had a sign telling its customers that they reserved the right to deny service to anyone. I wonder who that person might be. Not me as I'm still full from a (as an Englishman would say) splendid meal.

So I guess we can withhold service but not to gays wanting a wedding cake. Hmm, interesting.

First gays, now Trumpers. Can't we all get along. No seriously. I don't know where in the Bible it says you can't bake a cake to Gays getting married even though you don't believe in that. God shall do the judging, at our demise. With that you can be sure of that. Get married if you must to a same sex person but don't expect any breaks later. The cake thing is just peanuts in comparison to the other.

(01-29-2017 03:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  lol the hypocrisy from the cons that is about to hit this thread.

Give me a break! Anyone for any reason can choose to serve or not serve anybody for any reason. If that person doesn't like it, they can choose to go somewhere else. They can vote with their feet and wallets. Instead, we have butthurt people who got their feelings hurt suing various establishments over stupid reasons, all in the name of "social justice". Oh, you're a gay couple and a Christian establishment refuses to bake you a cake because they don't agree with your lifestyle? GO SOMEWHERE ELSE! How hard is that? Holy crap! But NO! LET'S WASTE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE NAME OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GO AFTER SOMEONE WHO REFUSED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE BECAUSE THAT COUPLE WANTS A WEDDING CAKE BAKED BY THEM, COMMON SENSE BE DAMNED! If I had been a judge, I would've thrown those cases out. "If you don't like it, go ask another bakery that will gladly accept your business. Vote with your wallet! CASE DISMISSED!"

Again, common sense goes out of the window more and more in the name of social justice. So hypocrisy? Nope. The woman has every right to do what she did, and the customer has every right to go somewhere else and tell his or her friends not to do business with her.

(01-29-2017 11:09 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 03:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  lol the hypocrisy from the cons that is about to hit this thread.

Give me a break! Anyone for any reason can choose to serve or not serve anybody for any reason. If that person doesn't like it, they can choose to go somewhere else. They can vote with their feet and wallets. Instead, we have butthurt people who got their feelings hurt suing various establishments over stupid reasons, all in the name of "social justice". Oh, you're a gay couple and a Christian establishment refuses to bake you a cake because they don't agree with your lifestyle? GO SOMEWHERE ELSE! How hard is that? Holy crap! But NO! LET'S WASTE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE NAME OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GO AFTER SOMEONE WHO REFUSED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE BECAUSE THAT COUPLE WANTS A CAKE BAKED BY THEM, COMMON SENSE BE DAMNED! If I had been a judge, I would've thrown those cases out. "If you don't like it, go ask another bakery that will gladly accept your business. Vote with your wallet! CASE DISMISSED!"

Again, common sense goes out of the window more and more in the name of social justice. So hypocrisy? Nope. The woman has ever right to do what she did, and the customer has every right to go somewhere else and tell his friends not to do business with her.

Whats really ridiculous about the Oregon bakers is that they had served the gay couple for years. They simply didnt want to be a participant in a gay wedding. But some gays cant be happy unless they force everyone to participate in their lifestyle.

The hammer is about to fall on the gay couple and the state. The state official who brought the suit was just voted out of office. If Oregon was smart, they'd go ahead and give the couple a few million to make this go away, because it aint going to end pretty for the state.

It's almost like message boards have now eeked their way into real life.

(01-29-2017 04:34 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 04:28 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Fine with me...Go to another frame shop and spread the word on this one.

Which is what appears to be what the woman is doing in this case.

Good for her. There are lots of other very good frame shops around there. You can include Hobby Lobby, which is BIG in CO. I've used them many times and they don't have to have PC cakes or photos to get taken care of.

In the words of George Soros.....MOVE ON BABY AND TELL ALL THE WORLD. There are BETTER places to do business in Colorado.

(01-29-2017 11:29 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 11:09 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 03:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  lol the hypocrisy from the cons that is about to hit this thread.

Give me a break! Anyone for any reason can choose to serve or not serve anybody for any reason. If that person doesn't like it, they can choose to go somewhere else. They can vote with their feet and wallets. Instead, we have butthurt people who got their feelings hurt suing various establishments over stupid reasons, all in the name of "social justice". Oh, you're a gay couple and a Christian establishment refuses to bake you a cake because they don't agree with your lifestyle? GO SOMEWHERE ELSE! How hard is that? Holy crap! But NO! LET'S WASTE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE NAME OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GO AFTER SOMEONE WHO REFUSED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE BECAUSE THAT COUPLE WANTS A CAKE BAKED BY THEM, COMMON SENSE BE DAMNED! If I had been a judge, I would've thrown those cases out. "If you don't like it, go ask another bakery that will gladly accept your business. Vote with your wallet! CASE DISMISSED!"

Again, common sense goes out of the window more and more in the name of social justice. So hypocrisy? Nope. The woman has ever right to do what she did, and the customer has every right to go somewhere else and tell his friends not to do business with her.

Whats really ridiculous about the Oregon bakers is that they had served the gay couple for years. They simply didnt want to be a participant in a gay wedding. But some gays cant be happy unless they force everyone to participate in their lifestyle.

The hammer is about to fall on the gay couple and the state. The state official who brought the suit was just voted out of office. If Oregon was smart, they'd go ahead and give the couple a few million to make this go away, because it ain't going to end pretty for the state.

I hope the bakers OWN the state...big time. That outside the box state has gone completely off the line of clear thinking. Must be the sog off the coast.

Pay up Oregon ! ! !

(01-29-2017 03:47 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  In my time working my last two jobs I've been around the most annoying liberals and now I'm amongst the most annoying Trumpers.

Nobody deserves to have service denied to them if they aren't behaving badly or if it isn't beyond your level of ability. I would definitely want to deny service to them, but I couldn't actually do it.

I'm not much into praying for things, but I do pray that we can get together behind something in this country. Short of an alien invasion, I don't see it ever happening again.

I'm pretty sure in an Alien invasion we'd still be arguing.

There would be at least 10 page thread on here arguing about whether or not the big UFO that just obliterated half of Washington is actually an alien, or a terrorist attack by ISIS. Tom would probably start another thread about whether or not the aliens will be accepting of the LGBT community. At least one person would blame Obama for this.

(01-30-2017 12:46 AM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 03:47 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  In my time working my last two jobs I've been around the most annoying liberals and now I'm amongst the most annoying Trumpers.

Nobody deserves to have service denied to them if they aren't behaving badly or if it isn't beyond your level of ability. I would definitely want to deny service to them, but I couldn't actually do it.

I'm not much into praying for things, but I do pray that we can get together behind something in this country. Short of an alien invasion, I don't see it ever happening again.

I'm pretty sure in an Alien invasion we'd still be arguing.

There would be at least 10 page thread on here arguing about whether or not the big UFO that just obliterated half of Washington is actually an alien, or a terrorist attack by ISIS. Tom would probably start another thread about whether or not the aliens will be accepting of the LGBT community. At least one person would blame Obama for this.

I hope the President doesn't fail to call it what it is: extraterrestrial terrorism. That adjective is important.

(01-29-2017 03:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  lol the hypocrisy from the cons that is about to hit this thread.

Wrong. A private business should be able to refuse to do business with anyone for any reason. The market will determine if it gets to stay in business.

I have a very liberal female bartender that cried when Hillary lost, but She always is glad when my wife and I come in at Happy hour. She gives great service and enjoys a good tip when We leave. We talked politics before and after the election. This is how the country should react with each other daily. It's not a war.

(01-29-2017 05:25 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 05:21 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 05:19 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  Oh man, all the hypocrites in this thread

Where?

In every post from you cons

You need a dictionary.

(01-29-2017 11:03 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I went into this restaurant this afternoon after church and they had a sign telling its customers that they reserved the right to deny service to anyone. I wonder who that person might be. Not me as I'm still full from a (as an Englishman would say) splendid meal.

So I guess we can withhold service but not to gays wanting a wedding cake. Hmm, interesting.

First gays, now Trumpers. Can't we all get along. No seriously. I don't know where in the Bible it says you can't bake a cake to Gays getting married even though you don't believe in that. God shall do the judging, at our demise. With that you can be sure of that. Get married if you must to a same sex person but don't expect any breaks later. The cake thing is just peanuts in comparison to the other.

That is probably not a new sign. Restaurants have that so they can refuse service to people who are drunk or disruptive.

(01-29-2017 11:09 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 03:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  lol the hypocrisy from the cons that is about to hit this thread.

Give me a break! Anyone for any reason can choose to serve or not serve anybody for any reason. If that person doesn't like it, they can choose to go somewhere else. They can vote with their feet and wallets. Instead, we have butthurt people who got their feelings hurt suing various establishments over stupid reasons, all in the name of "social justice". Oh, you're a gay couple and a Christian establishment refuses to bake you a cake because they don't agree with your lifestyle? GO SOMEWHERE ELSE! How hard is that? Holy crap! But NO! LET'S WASTE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE NAME OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GO AFTER SOMEONE WHO REFUSED TO SERVE A GAY COUPLE BECAUSE THAT COUPLE WANTS A WEDDING CAKE BAKED BY THEM, COMMON SENSE BE DAMNED! If I had been a judge, I would've thrown those cases out. "If you don't like it, go ask another bakery that will gladly accept your business. Vote with your wallet! CASE DISMISSED!"

Again, common sense goes out of the window more and more in the name of social justice. So hypocrisy? Nope. The woman has every right to do what she did, and the customer has every right to go somewhere else and tell his or her friends not to do business with her.

One time in HS, we were at an event at a Black HS (Kashmere HS in Houston). Our group was all white or Hispanic and we went to lunch at a Jack-in-the Box in the neighborhood. I would have left, but the rest of the group was more patient than me. They kept waiting on Black drive-thru customers and didn't serve us. It took 45 minutes. Obviously, the manager of the store was aware of what was going on. It wasn't just one employee. So I chose never to go to Jack-in-the-Box again (given the times they were caught serving horsemeat in that era, there were other good reasons). That's been over 40 years. That's how you deal with it.

(01-30-2017 06:45 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 05:25 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 05:21 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 05:19 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  Oh man, all the hypocrites in this thread

Where?

In every post from you cons

You need a dictionary.

He wasn't serious. A jab at johns nonsense in post #2.

(01-30-2017 12:46 AM)chiefsfan Wrote:  I'm pretty sure in an Alien invasion we'd still be arguing.

Not if the American president gives a speech and rallies the world to attack the alien mothership.

(01-29-2017 04:28 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Fine with me...Go to another frame shop and spread the word on this one.

Yep, let the market take care of it and move on.