Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Trump Administration
Author Message
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #10161
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 10:44 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Lad, you are doing a bunch of conflating there. I do not believe that there is anybody posting on this board who is espousing Death to America.

But there are people among democrat politicians in Washington who do support Death to America. I would put Tlaib and Omar in that group. I certainly believe that they would support killing Americans to get rid of Trump. You may have a different opinion, but that's mine.

And there are people on here who have expressed support for, or at least defended, Tlaib and Omar on multiple occasions. I think that is what OO means by indirectly.

There are those on the left who have tried to conflate Trump supporters with the KKK. But there is a big difference. The KKK has expressed support for Trump, but Trump has not to my knowledge expressed support for the KKK. Even the oft-misquoted, "Some good people," comment does not express that if taken in context of the complete statement. I'm not aware that anyone on here has expressed support for the KKK. I am aware that people on here have expressed support for Tlaib and Omar.

Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying no one on this board thought that there were others here who supported those chants.

And I don't think Talib or Omar feel that way - do you have examples of them supporting such a vitriolic stance? In this conversation, there is a quote from James Baldwin I think about a lot:

“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”

Let's not conflate their criticisms of Trump, or even America at large, with advocating for the death of America.
01-06-2020 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #10162
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 10:49 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying no one on this board thought that there were others here who supported those chants.
And I don't think Talib or Omar feel that way - do you have examples of them supporting such a vitriolic stance? In this conversation, there is a quote from James Baldwin I think about a lot:
“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”
Let's not conflate their criticisms of Trump, or even America at large, with advocating for the death of America.

"Some people did something," comes pretty close.

I don't think either one would be dumb enough to say overtly, "Death to America." But I think they make their feelings on the issue pretty clear.
01-06-2020 11:00 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #10163
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 11:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 10:49 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying no one on this board thought that there were others here who supported those chants.
And I don't think Talib or Omar feel that way - do you have examples of them supporting such a vitriolic stance? In this conversation, there is a quote from James Baldwin I think about a lot:
“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”
Let's not conflate their criticisms of Trump, or even America at large, with advocating for the death of America.

"Some people did something," comes pretty close.

I don't think either one would be dumb enough to say overtly, "Death to America." But I think they make their feelings on the issue pretty clear.

Really?

Quote:She has faced criticism for using the phrase “some people did something” in remarks about the attacks during a speech in March. She used the phrase while speaking to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, stating that the group “was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”

https://apnews.com/afs:Content:7354840002

Yes, truly very close to shouting "Death to America!"
01-06-2020 11:03 AM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #10164
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 11:03 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 11:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 10:49 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying no one on this board thought that there were others here who supported those chants.
And I don't think Talib or Omar feel that way - do you have examples of them supporting such a vitriolic stance? In this conversation, there is a quote from James Baldwin I think about a lot:
“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”
Let's not conflate their criticisms of Trump, or even America at large, with advocating for the death of America.
"Some people did something," comes pretty close.
I don't think either one would be dumb enough to say overtly, "Death to America." But I think they make their feelings on the issue pretty clear.
Really?
Quote:She has faced criticism for using the phrase “some people did something” in remarks about the attacks during a speech in March. She used the phrase while speaking to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, stating that the group “was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”
https://apnews.com/afs:Content:7354840002
Yes, truly very close to shouting "Death to America!"

I think speaking to CAIR comes pretty close to shouting, "Death to America," and supporting or defending her comments made their comes pretty close to indirect support.
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2020 11:19 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
01-06-2020 11:06 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10165
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 10:24 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:17 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 08:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You don’t believe that?
May I point you to OO’s response to the same question?
I don't believe what?
And I'll let OO speak for OO and I'll speak for me.
Quote:I don't know that anyone on here believes that, and I'd like to think not.

Not following.

Your initial comment was to Big's response to this OO quote, which implicitly says there are people here that are on the side of Death to America:

Quote:So whether the promise is more sanctions or a drone strike or a nuke, people who shout "Death to America" better know the difference between the POTUS then and the POTUS now. And people here should not be on the side of the Death to Americans just to oppose Trump.

I asked OO to clarify what people he was talking about and he said:


(01-05-2020 09:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(01-05-2020 11:22 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-05-2020 09:35 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  The ones who oppose strong action against terrorists. (Don’t hurt them, don’t capture them, don’t hold them, you might make them mad)

The ones who support the Iranian nuclear deal.

The ones who would prefer to see a softer, more apologetic approach to Mid East relations - more Obama like, lessTrump like. (Please stop what you doing, we will give you money.)

If none of this applies to anybody here, then I am not referring to them.

So you're literally equating having a different approach to foreign policy to directly supporting people shouting death to America?

Indirectly.

So, I pointed out that OO does believe that people on this board are supporting those who chant death to America.

Indirectly.
01-06-2020 11:15 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10166
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 10:24 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 09:17 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 08:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You don’t believe that?
May I point you to OO’s response to the same question?
I don't believe what?
And I'll let OO speak for OO and I'll speak for me.
Quote:I don't know that anyone on here believes that, and I'd like to think not.

Not following.

Your initial comment was to Big's response to this OO quote, which implicitly says there are people here that are on the side of Death to America:

Quote:So whether the promise is more sanctions or a drone strike or a nuke, people who shout "Death to America" better know the difference between the POTUS then and the POTUS now. And people here should not be on the side of the Death to Americans just to oppose Trump.

I asked OO to clarify what people he was talking about and he said:


(01-05-2020 09:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(01-05-2020 11:22 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-05-2020 09:35 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  The ones who oppose strong action against terrorists. (Don’t hurt them, don’t capture them, don’t hold them, you might make them mad)

The ones who support the Iranian nuclear deal.

The ones who would prefer to see a softer, more apologetic approach to Mid East relations - more Obama like, lessTrump like. (Please stop what you doing, we will give you money.)

If none of this applies to anybody here, then I am not referring to them.

So you're literally equating having a different approach to foreign policy to directly supporting people shouting death to America?

Indirectly.

So, I pointed out that OO does believe that people on this board are supporting those who chant death to America.

Indirectly.
01-06-2020 11:16 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #10167
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 11:06 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 11:03 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 11:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 10:49 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying no one on this board thought that there were others here who supported those chants.
And I don't think Talib or Omar feel that way - do you have examples of them supporting such a vitriolic stance? In this conversation, there is a quote from James Baldwin I think about a lot:
“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”
Let's not conflate their criticisms of Trump, or even America at large, with advocating for the death of America.
"Some people did something," comes pretty close.
I don't think either one would be dumb enough to say overtly, "Death to America." But I think they make their feelings on the issue pretty clear.
Really?
Quote:She has faced criticism for using the phrase “some people did something” in remarks about the attacks during a speech in March. She used the phrase while speaking to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, stating that the group “was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”
https://apnews.com/afs:Content:7354840002
Yes, truly very close to shouting "Death to America!"

I think speaking to CAIR comes pretty close to shouting, "Death to America," and supporting or defending her comments made their comes pretty close to indirect support.

I don't know enough to understand why even talking to this organization is so hateful. Can you explain it a bit?

I see through a quick search that there are accusations of it being tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, but it sounds like your understanding is great enough that you could give me a quicker download/primer.
01-06-2020 11:26 AM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #10168
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 11:26 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  I don't know enough to understand why even talking to this organization is so hateful. Can you explain it a bit?
I see through a quick search that there are accusations of it being tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, but it sounds like your understanding is great enough that you could give me a quicker download/primer.

I think there are more than accusations. I think some funds have actually been traced between them. Don't have time to do a search now, but maybe later if it gets to where that is needed.

So if Donald Trump spoke to the KKK, you'd be okay with that? In her case, it's a bit more than just talking to an organization. She expressed support for their goals and objectives, and they obviously support her.
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2020 11:38 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
01-06-2020 11:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
mrbig Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,662
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: New Orleans
Post: #10169
RE: Trump Administration
I have seen zero evidence that Talib, Omar, or AOC would even think of doing anything close to supporting terrorists. They might have a different view of what makes America great than you, but so do I. If you think they are supporting terrorists, then I guess I am as well. Call DOJ and let them know I should be fired or investigated. Guess I was able to sneak through the 3 FBI background checks I have gone though. When I chant U-S-A and you chant U-S-A, I understand that we might be cheering for slightly different ideals. But I never doubt that you love our country, and it saddens me that some of you think that numerous fellow country-persons hate our country. You are wrong about that and I hope you some day realize it, even if it comes with higher taxes on the wealthy and big business, more regulations on big business, a cleaner environment, and a more peaceful world.

OO - fair point about civility. You suggesting I support people who chant "Death to America" drove me over an edge more easily then I suspected. That said, I consider you accusation to be significantly worse than if you had told me to go F myself, so relatively speaking, you are still taking the "treat others like Mr. Hanky" cake. While I occasionally gain some insight interacting with other right-of-center persons on this board, I honestly gain nothing from interacting with you (other than heartburn). So I'll try not to do it unless I see a way where we could both do so constructively.

Here's a fun thought. I think home grown white supremacists pose as big of a threat to the US as Iran right now. They kill more Americans and inflict more terror within our borders. Iran certainly has more sophistication and organization than the white supremacists, but their threat is less immediately prevalent and is not as internally divisive. As proven by Helmut Zemo, it can be more effective to divide us from within so we destroy ourselves.
01-06-2020 11:50 AM
Find all posts by this user
mrbig Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,662
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: New Orleans
Post: #10170
RE: Trump Administration
I am dead serious. If you believe I am a terrorist sympathizer, then it is your patriotic duty to report it to the FBI. I will give you my name and place of work in a message, if you don’t know it.

In the meantime, I will go back to wishing Bernie, Warren, and Biden had stayed out of the race and listening to my Stephen Hawking audiobook.
01-06-2020 12:11 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10171
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 12:11 PM)mrbig Wrote:  I am dead serious. If you believe I am a terrorist sympathizer, then it is your patriotic duty to report it to the FBI. I will give you my name and place of work in a message, if you don’t know it.

In the meantime, I will go back to wishing Bernie, Warren, and Biden had stayed out of the race and listening to my Stephen Hawking audiobook.


You are way too literal. But for example, a lot of Democrats are saying Trump overstepped when he ordered that terrorist killed. So they think the terrorist should NOT have been killed, rather left alone to devise whatever attacks against us he wants.

I see that position as supporting the terrorist just to oppose Trump. I don’t think any of us should support the terrorists, for any reason.

I don’t think you are a direct terrorist sympathizer. You are not sending money to Hamas. But I think you support policies and choices that work to the benefit of the terrorists, by supporting certain Dem policies and actions.

Should Trump have ordered that strike? Yes or no.

Should Obama have offered that deal to Iran? Yes or no.

Should Trump have withdrawn from Obama’s Iran deal? Yes or no.

Should Obama have kept his word when he drew the red line? Yes or no.

Many Dem policies are for appeasement. I don’t agree with that. I prefer somebody who will stand up to terrorists. Appeasement works to support the terrorists. For example, the billions that Obama paid for his deal, money that went to Hamas and other antiAmerican terrorist orgs.

Do you believe we should appease terrorists or stand up to them?

Get off your high horse of being literal. Look at the principles. For a group that believes in Trump blowing dog whistles, you sure can be literal when you want.
01-06-2020 12:49 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10172
RE: Trump Administration
I see The Squad has moved to accusing Trump of war crimes. Does this in any way provide support to Iran?
01-06-2020 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user
Fountains of Wayne Graham Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 288
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #10173
RE: Trump Administration
You're doing the right thing, big. Mostly anger and fear in this forum.
01-06-2020 12:56 PM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #10174
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 12:49 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 12:11 PM)mrbig Wrote:  I am dead serious. If you believe I am a terrorist sympathizer, then it is your patriotic duty to report it to the FBI. I will give you my name and place of work in a message, if you don’t know it.

In the meantime, I will go back to wishing Bernie, Warren, and Biden had stayed out of the race and listening to my Stephen Hawking audiobook.


You are way too literal. But for example, a lot of Democrats are saying Trump overstepped when he ordered that terrorist killed. So they think the terrorist should NOT have been killed, rather left alone to devise whatever attacks against us he wants.

I see that position as supporting the terrorist just to oppose Trump. I don’t think any of us should support the terrorists, for any reason.

What if, just hear me out, people oppose it because of the ramifications of the actions, and that those ramifications could be worse than not killing the terrorist?

This isn't some weird binary response like you make it out to be.

Quote:I don’t think you are a direct terrorist sympathizer. You are not sending money to Hamas. But I think you support policies and choices that work to the benefit of the terrorists, by supporting certain Dem policies and actions.

See, and this is why it isn't binary. It is just your opinion that these policies would benefit terrorists. In fact, there is a chance they actually support terrorists more by potentially galvanizing support against the US, leading to a surge in terrorist activities.
Quote:Should Trump have ordered that strike? Yes or no.

Should Obama have offered that deal to Iran? Yes or no.

Should Trump have withdrawn from Obama’s Iran deal? Yes or no.

Should Obama have kept his word when he drew the red line? Yes or no.

Many Dem policies are for appeasement. I don’t agree with that. I prefer somebody who will stand up to terrorists. Appeasement works to support the terrorists. For example, the billions that Obama paid for his deal, money that went to Hamas and other antiAmerican terrorist orgs.

Do you believe we should appease terrorists or stand up to them?

Get off your high horse of being literal. Look at the principles. For a group that believes in Trump blowing dog whistles, you sure can be literal when you want.

And you again make a false equivalency. There are other options between appeasement and standing up to them through assassinations.

Only Sith deal in absolutes.
01-06-2020 01:04 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10175
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 12:56 PM)Fountains of Wayne Graham Wrote:  You're doing the right thing, big. Mostly anger and fear in this forum.

Seems to me Big is the angry one, but you can look at things through any tinted lens you want.

Kind of curious what forum Founty recommends to avoid anger and fear. Where you think we should go for joy and adoration? The Vatican website?
01-06-2020 01:06 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10176
RE: Trump Administration
Lieberman

President Trump’s order to take out Qasem Soleimani was morally, constitutionally and strategically correct. It deserves more bipartisan support than the begrudging or negative reactions it has received thus far from my fellow Democrats.
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2020 01:16 PM by OptimisticOwl.)
01-06-2020 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #10177
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 01:14 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Lieberman

President Trump’s order to take out Qasem Soleimani was morally, constitutionally and strategically correct. It deserves more bipartisan support than the begrudging or negative reactions it has received thus far from my fellow Democrats.

I am shocked I tell you, shocked, that the Democratic party is not immediately in favor of military actions.

I am shocked I tell you, shocked, that Lieberman is an outside voice in the Democratic party.
01-06-2020 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #10178
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 01:04 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 12:49 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  
(01-06-2020 12:11 PM)mrbig Wrote:  I am dead serious. If you believe I am a terrorist sympathizer, then it is your patriotic duty to report it to the FBI. I will give you my name and place of work in a message, if you don’t know it.

In the meantime, I will go back to wishing Bernie, Warren, and Biden had stayed out of the race and listening to my Stephen Hawking audiobook.


You are way too literal. But for example, a lot of Democrats are saying Trump overstepped when he ordered that terrorist killed. So they think the terrorist should NOT have been killed, rather left alone to devise whatever attacks against us he wants.

I see that position as supporting the terrorist just to oppose Trump. I don’t think any of us should support the terrorists, for any reason.

What if, just hear me out, people oppose it because of the ramifications of the actions, and that those ramifications could be worse than not killing the terrorist?

This isn't some weird binary response like you make it out to be.

Quote:I don’t think you are a direct terrorist sympathizer. You are not sending money to Hamas. But I think you support policies and choices that work to the benefit of the terrorists, by supporting certain Dem policies and actions.

See, and this is why it isn't binary. It is just your opinion that these policies would benefit terrorists. In fact, there is a chance they actually support terrorists more by potentially galvanizing support against the US, leading to a surge in terrorist activities.
Quote:Should Trump have ordered that strike? Yes or no.

Should Obama have offered that deal to Iran? Yes or no.

Should Trump have withdrawn from Obama’s Iran deal? Yes or no.

Should Obama have kept his word when he drew the red line? Yes or no.

Many Dem policies are for appeasement. I don’t agree with that. I prefer somebody who will stand up to terrorists. Appeasement works to support the terrorists. For example, the billions that Obama paid for his deal, money that went to Hamas and other antiAmerican terrorist orgs.

Do you believe we should appease terrorists or stand up to them?

Get off your high horse of being literal. Look at the principles. For a group that believes in Trump blowing dog whistles, you sure can be literal when you want.

And you again make a false equivalency. There are other options between appeasement and standing up to them through assassinations.

Only Sith deal in absolutes.

Nice Star Wars reference. Now I am being compared to fictional characters! That is unique in my experience.

But I did not say “standing up to them through assassinations”. That is pure Ladspeak. I said “standing up to them”.

But I agree, there are many ways to stand up to them, and killing terrorists is just one - one you applauded when it was Obama doing the killing.


But accusing Trump of war crimes is a stance shared by Iran and certain Democrats in Congress.
01-06-2020 02:19 PM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #10179
RE: Trump Administration
(01-06-2020 11:50 AM)mrbig Wrote:  I have seen zero evidence that Talib, Omar, or AOC would even think of doing anything close to supporting terrorists. They might have a different view of what makes America great than you, but so do I. If you think they are supporting terrorists, then I guess I am as well. Call DOJ and let them know I should be fired or investigated. Guess I was able to sneak through the 3 FBI background checks I have gone though. When I chant U-S-A and you chant U-S-A, I understand that we might be cheering for slightly different ideals. But I never doubt that you love our country, and it saddens me that some of you think that numerous fellow country-persons hate our country.

I don't doubt that you chant U-S-A, or that you mean it. I do not believe that you would ever willingly support death to America, nor do I believe that Lad or anybody else that I know on this board would.

But I simply cannot fathom your bolded statement. I think they have gone beyond any reasonable bounds to express opinions that suggest very strongly, to me at least, that they would in fact support terrorism and terrorists, if they are not already in fact doing so, in order to achieve their goals. Whether their goals explicitly call for death to America may be debatable, but I see no basis for any doubt that achieving their goals would effect a de facto death to USA. I could see a statement that you don't find the evidence compelling, but I simply cannot comprehend how you can say that you see nothing.

Quote:You are wrong about that and I hope you some day realize it, even if it comes with higher taxes on the wealthy and big business, more regulations on big business, a cleaner environment, and a more peaceful world.

I am fully supportive of a cleaner environment and a more peaceful world, although we probably differ on how to get there. But no matter how much you want to push the class warfare against those evil rich people and corporations, it's a fact of life that they have options to go elsewhere in the world, and if we treat them worse than those other places they will move there (have been to some extent for decades) and the effect will be to hurt us more than them. Most of Europe deals with them with carrots, not sticks. If we want to remain competitive, we need to do the same.

Quote:OO - fair point about civility. You suggesting I support people who chant "Death to America" drove me over an edge more easily then I suspected. That said, I consider you accusation to be significantly worse than if you had told me to go F myself, so relatively speaking, you are still taking the "treat others like Mr. Hanky" cake. While I occasionally gain some insight interacting with other right-of-center persons on this board, I honestly gain nothing from interacting with you (other than heartburn). So I'll try not to do it unless I see a way where we could both do so constructively.

There is a distinction that needs to be made here. I don't believe, and I don't think OO believes, that you support death to America. But there are people that both OO and believe, and I think reasonably so, do support death to America, and I think that you and Lad, among others have made statements in support of them, perhaps on other issues, but support nevertheless.

Quote:Here's a fun thought. I think home grown white supremacists pose as big of a threat to the US as Iran right now. They kill more Americans and inflict more terror within our borders. Iran certainly has more sophistication and organization than the white supremacists, but their threat is less immediately prevalent and is not as internally divisive. As proven by Helmut Zemo, it can be more effective to divide us from within so we destroy ourselves.

I think Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren and AOC and Tlaib and Omar and Pressley, among others, pose a larger treat to the US than white supremacsts or Iran or Russia or China or North Korea.
01-06-2020 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user
mrbig Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,662
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: New Orleans
Post: #10180
RE: Trump Administration
OO - in answer to your substantive questions, I don’t think any of us have enough information to know whether Trump should have ordered the attack. My suspicion is no since I have heard people who worked in both the Bush and Obama administrations say they could have taken the same individual out and did not because they felt the risks of escalating the situation with Iran did not outweigh the benefits of taking out a single bad, bad dude. On the other questions, yes on the Iran deal, no on the withdrawal, and yes on enforcing the red line.

Did I pass the test or am I a terrorist sympathizer who hates this country?
01-06-2020 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.