(10-11-2016 10:54 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:49 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:28 AM)john01992 Wrote:  notice how you didn't try to contradict any of the facts I presented?

Notice how you ignored what Lincoln did? Stay angry zero it makes me happy.

I didn't ignore. I just simply pointed out that your interpretation is nothing but whitewashed bull**** perpetrated by southern hicks.

$300 buy out fee. Fact

(10-11-2016 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 10:54 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:49 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:28 AM)john01992 Wrote:  notice how you didn't try to contradict any of the facts I presented?

Notice how you ignored what Lincoln did? Stay angry zero it makes me happy.

I didn't ignore. I just simply pointed out that your interpretation is nothing but whitewashed bull**** perpetrated by southern hicks.

$300 buy out fee. Fact

have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

(10-11-2016 11:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 10:52 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:37 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:07 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 07:29 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  How did he personally communicate smallpox and kill all those natives then?

while it is true that most died from the pandemic. the fact remains that of the surviving natives had an even higher mortality rate due to the brutal work conditions the europeans set up for them.

it is also true that europeans understood the smallpox advantage. I don't understand how one could not come across the smallpox blanket reference in your lifetime.

they also used that event to claim god supported what they were doing.

So......you think that line of reasoning supports your theory that Christopher Columbus (by discovering the Americas in the name of people who had written language) killed all the natives.

columbus acting like a tyrant, enslaving the local population, and sending the first slaves across the atlantic is not a theory but historical fact. the dude cut off the hands of native americans because they didn't meet their work quotas FFS.

source?

After he failed to contact the emperor of China, the traders of India, or the merchants of Japan, Columbus decided to pay for his voyage in the one important commodity he had found in ample supply -- human lives. He seized 1,200 Taino Indians from the island of Hispaniola, crammed as many onto his ships as would fit, and sent them to Spain, where they were paraded naked through the streets of Seville and sold as slaves in 1495. Columbus tore children from their parents, husbands from wives. On board Columbus' slave ships, hundreds died; the sailors tossed the Indian bodies into the Atlantic.

(10-11-2016 11:16 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 10:54 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:49 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:28 AM)john01992 Wrote:  notice how you didn't try to contradict any of the facts I presented?

Notice how you ignored what Lincoln did? Stay angry zero it makes me happy.

I didn't ignore. I just simply pointed out that your interpretation is nothing but whitewashed bull**** perpetrated by southern hicks.

$300 buy out fee. Fact

have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

So you admit that I am right?

(10-11-2016 11:23 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:16 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 10:54 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 09:49 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Notice how you ignored what Lincoln did? Stay angry zero it makes me happy.

I didn't ignore. I just simply pointed out that your interpretation is nothing but whitewashed bull**** perpetrated by southern hicks.

$300 buy out fee. Fact

have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

So you admit that I am right?

no I am saying you are a buffoon. only a total idiot thinking "rich man's war poor man's fight" is exclusive to the North during the civil war.

(10-11-2016 11:41 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:23 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:16 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 10:54 AM)john01992 Wrote:  I didn't ignore. I just simply pointed out that your interpretation is nothing but whitewashed bull**** perpetrated by southern hicks.

$300 buy out fee. Fact

have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

So you admit that I am right?

no I am saying you are a buffoon. only a total idiot thinking "rich man's war poor man's fight" is exclusive to the North during the civil war.

Name calling and lying again, and putting words in my mouth. You are denying there was Commutation Fee during the Civil War. Are you really that phucking stupid, or willfully ignorant?

(10-11-2016 11:47 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:41 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:23 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:16 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:04 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  $300 buy out fee. Fact

have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

So you admit that I am right?

no I am saying you are a buffoon. only a total idiot thinking "rich man's war poor man's fight" is exclusive to the North during the civil war.

Name calling and lying again, and putting words in my mouth. You are denying there was Commutation Fee during the Civil War. Are you really that phucking stupid, or willfully ignorant?

lol you refuse to acknowledge the point and have no resort to blatant misquoting me. that is on top of being too idiotic to understand the point I'm making.

(10-11-2016 11:59 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:47 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:41 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:23 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 11:16 AM)john01992 Wrote:  have you heard of the 20 slave law? oh and it was passed by the confederacy over a year before the event you referenced.

So you admit that I am right?

no I am saying you are a buffoon. only a total idiot thinking "rich man's war poor man's fight" is exclusive to the North during the civil war.

Name calling and lying again, and putting words in my mouth. You are denying there was Commutation Fee during the Civil War. Are you really that phucking stupid, or willfully ignorant?

lol you refuse to acknowledge the point and have no resort to blatant misquoting me. that is on top of being too idiotic to understand the point I'm making.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrollment_Act

You being angry 247 makes me happy. You are a miserable person. ZERO.

again. you are a total buffoon if you think "rich man's war...poo man's fight" is exclusive to the North during the civil war. you blatantly show a bias by focusing on the North doing this but not the south who had a far worse law. secondly you have not made a connection as to how this law paints Lincoln or the North in an excessively bad light. lastly you clearly lack brain cells if you think I denied the existence of this law.

and FTR you being stupid 247 just to try to get under my skin verifies that you are a schmuck who is dumb enough to let me get inside your head.

Love your new home.

Why is it that White Libturds feel that they need to fight other people's battles. I'm part Native American and I don't need these doofusses thinking that I need their "protection".

Stupid idiots!

(10-11-2016 07:27 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Why is it that White Libturds feel that they need to fight other people's battles. I'm part Native American and I don't need these doofusses thinking that I need their "protection".

Stupid idiots!

Haven't you heard? Liberals believe that minorities are strong and independent, that's why they want to fight your battles for you! Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk